From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lukas Bulwahn Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 05:39:40 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: make linux-mediatek list remarks consistent Message-Id: List-Id: References: <20200914053110.23286-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20200914053110.23286-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Lukas Bulwahn Cc: Ryder Lee , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Ralf Ramsauer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Matthias Brugger , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Bjorn Helgaas , Joe Perches , Pia Eichinger On Mon, 14 Sep 2020, Lukas Bulwahn wrote: > Commit 637cfacae96f ("PCI: mediatek: Add MediaTek PCIe host controller > support") does not mention that linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org is > moderated for non-subscribers, but the other eight entries for > linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org do. > > Adjust this entry to be consistent with all others. > > Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn > --- > applies cleanly on v5.9-rc5 and next-20200911 > > Ryder, please ack. > > Bjorn, Matthias, please pick this minor non-urgent clean-up patch. > > This patch submission will also show me if linux-mediatek is moderated or > not. I have not subscribed to linux-mediatek and if it shows up quickly in > the archive, the list is probably not moderated; and if it takes longer, it > is moderated, and hence, validating the patch. > Okay, my patch showed up within seconds in the archive: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mediatek/20200914053110.23286-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com/ I think the linux-mediatek list is actually NOT _moderated for non-subscribers_. Please IGNORE this patch until someone can confirm if it is moderated or not. I will then send the patch that reflects the actual state. Thanks, Lukas