From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lukas Bulwahn Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 15:23:58 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: make linux-mediatek list remarks consistent Message-Id: List-Id: References: <20200914053110.23286-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com> <9c5aaa15-bdd8-ae4f-0642-092566ab08ba@gmail.com> <7da64c0975c345f1f45034410c9ed7d509ba9831.camel@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: David Woodhouse Cc: Ryder Lee , Joe Perches , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Ralf Ramsauer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Matthias Brugger , Lukas Bulwahn , Pia Eichinger On Mon, 14 Sep 2020, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Mon, 2020-09-14 at 16:57 +0200, Lukas Bulwahn wrote: > > Well, I am happy to send any PATCH v2. I guess we, you, David, Matthias > > and I, now just need to determine if the list is moderated or not. > > It really isn't. > > # /usr/lib/mailman/bin/config_list -o- linux-mediatek | grep -B5 ^generic_nonmember_action > # legal values are: > # 0 = "Accept" > # 1 = "Hold" > # 2 = "Reject" > # 3 = "Discard" > generic_nonmember_action = 0 > David, I guess if you have access to the ground truth on lists.infradead.org, maybe you can dump the actual setting for all those lists? $ grep "lists.infradead.org" MAINTAINERS | sort | uniq L: ath10k@lists.infradead.org L: ath11k@lists.infradead.org L: b43-dev@lists.infradead.org L: kexec@lists.infradead.org L: libertas-dev@lists.infradead.org L: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org L: linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org L: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org L: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers) L: linux-geode@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers) L: linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers) L: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org L: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers) L: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org L: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org L: linux-parport@lists.infradead.org (subscribers-only) L: linux-realtek-soc@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers) L: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org L: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org L: linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers) L: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org L: linux-um@lists.infradead.org L: linux-unisoc@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers) L: wcn36xx@lists.infradead.org They are all reporting different settings and linux-mediatek and linux-arm-kernel even inconsistently. The inconsistency and a poor attempt to resolve that is what started this discussion. I can then send out the patch to adjust MAINTAINERS to your ground truth from the server. Thanks for your support, Lukas