From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Markus Elfring Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2020 17:32:16 +0000 Subject: Re: [v2] Documentation: Coccinelle: fix typos and command example Message-Id: List-Id: References: <0616dd0c-bb86-be2b-3dc6-1c695a92c3ca@infradead.org> <2a3940de-6a81-1aff-8109-53c1c5a6aa1b@web.de> <2f80fb10-dc7f-29be-dc3e-2715f8bafc6d@web.de> <648d287e-3636-1858-1439-103d317f8571@web.de> <34065299-03cf-5b62-db37-0acc9830be72@infradead.org> <65db3f88-1ac8-374d-e3fe-2ea0970ffd67@web.de> <30b722ca-1bd8-2b96-ca41-1e9bc7212b66@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <30b722ca-1bd8-2b96-ca41-1e9bc7212b66@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Randy Dunlap , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Coccinelle Cc: LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall , Gilles Muller , Nicolas Palix , Michal Marek , Masahiro Yamada , Jonathan Corbet > None of that has anything to do with the current patch. Did you test the specified make command for the display of expected data processing results? How much do you distinguish desired effects according to the specification of file extensions for such build commands? Regards, Markus