From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Huacai Chen <chenhc@lemote.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Xuefeng Li <lixuefeng@loongson.cn>
Subject: Re: [1/7] irqchip: Fix potential resource leaks
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:23:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cc6b95ec-691e-f010-4a04-add39d706c4b@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bd28aef9-ba70-0539-bdc3-6ce7162cefca@loongson.cn>
>> [PATCH v3 10/14 RESEND] irqchip/nvic: Fix potential resource leaks
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mips/1592984711-3130-11-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn/
>> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1263191/
>>
>>
>> Can it matter to omit the word “potential” from change descriptions
>> after you detected that specific function calls were missing
>> in if branches?
>
> Oh, I find this issue through code review, I have no test environment
> to trigger the error path, but I think it is better to release the resource
> in the error path, so I use "potential" description.
Did you determine that special function calls were generally missing
in error cases?
Were any known software analysis tools involved for the detection of
questionable source code places?
Regards,
Markus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-24 9:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-23 15:55 [PATCH 1/7] irqchip: Fix potential resource leaks Markus Elfring
2020-06-24 1:44 ` Tiezhu Yang
2020-06-24 8:42 ` [1/7] " Markus Elfring
2020-06-24 9:16 ` Tiezhu Yang
2020-06-24 9:23 ` Markus Elfring [this message]
2020-06-24 9:56 ` Tiezhu Yang
2020-06-24 10:06 ` Markus Elfring
2020-06-24 11:30 ` Tiezhu Yang
2020-06-24 12:08 ` Markus Elfring
2020-06-28 3:27 ` Tiezhu Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cc6b95ec-691e-f010-4a04-add39d706c4b@web.de \
--to=markus.elfring@web.de \
--cc=chenhc@lemote.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lixuefeng@loongson.cn \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yangtiezhu@loongson.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).