From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1FDEC47425 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 12:06:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shelob.surriel.com (shelob.surriel.com [96.67.55.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 912D4206CD for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 12:06:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net header.i=@gmx.net header.b="NBFDnNt0" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 912D4206CD Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmx.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kernelnewbies-bounces@kernelnewbies.org Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=shelob.surriel.com) by shelob.surriel.com with esmtp (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1kNEOe-0004gh-34; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 08:06:16 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]) by shelob.surriel.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1kNEOb-0004gV-Nz for kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 08:06:14 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1601381166; bh=LofBl54tLGyz+hMv74TEBDIp+BF0ikzGrxN5ik3pwGc=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:Subject:Cc:References:In-Reply-To; b=NBFDnNt0eCPHmrnNLRCFVmG/KkFdTblMWAjoMWQkzVn3KsCU06IQk7MvgTMOAlwq4 WG73rw3SuioZwJtAybJs8JpTyqwzJu2tja5lQgz3WsbXHQQmgKZ08tDvZtLwe6RfQd U0ce5BHpwkdPkOlCWZ83lHwRwfM+5CTXre2qELPI= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from scdbackup.webframe.org ([84.179.245.142]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MPog5-1k0UU138Hj-00MwbM; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 14:06:06 +0200 Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 14:07:55 +0200 From: "Thomas Schmitt" To: kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org Subject: Re: What to do when a patch set gets no reply for 3 weeks ? References: <20200929103405.GA954079@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20200929103405.GA954079@kroah.com> Message-Id: <13946735447207132811@scdbackup.webframe.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:jmlkASJkNowwtD9XgIZl0rLbdMfhCEQ6swkj1VTS3LyinZy+v8P H58sT+gATKlZuAeQ0yK4x1bP4cSxnhTzogTsT8ll8D7gtK599IfKvkj3gseLJNzjuQwx63e qzMeL7h0na+dOWCwFYwquSbWm1qVFIsXKnI0iEVbl43XlWMnPd7G79yE/pEXNh/zigp9irw 4wbcrQgLlsVyOr+1v7tLA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:GEwuHucjoCw=:OlxlE4wikvSU1PycE3tTNI aRDA+SJ/DpJUsH8ufjJ+ZrxEuivF1frwfNetHC2P6cuBc+uqXV1bTMrHnZV8qKbZgw+nLCeUk 2vvDqUjBPhkQlBP1pOFTCwKruIMBi8HIxJLUmBRt9G+aYi8rLuHsqYYBhOIhzCXsTleuxpFak J3c+A5+JtTb4sirNhgIbKRf4V2rALxX6L8IqLIZS4WCiaImQ9YvBxFzRHsnkt4Jhs4qs4px3C K3/NfERV/b0B0aISX//o4mjOfdfdzun03bTB72YsFQEGtRJxkmMrzBQP8AbQB7ZXF8N1TUCNh LAANbLqaa8r5U1tKxx/+7qOHL9ZMttpuze3ucQG23ZRQj724jJUICYm8p4GiklQ9WBh27VUks +zVifIHvlH3GRRSkDVEyovv4bboN6Yflkp09VMvs+WkBKctHnD4Xk89tSTG/uC/kn5p6cgZgw /+rKm2DxFu63RL+c84LDSgYdPhrjOItAg+sXMwYSs0wFyi9siLtkla/dCg4LhTw9j7E6lJxVa L3K7GHuQ1WYxksqzgtL/h3jDymQ+tf7tHpVThKikZ+PEPoa+IvIN4n2/kCrG/sQWIDsGTc87x ESGd1RIesSuEKjuUy5hJjDDRruDVAImkrWwUrMay2R7waGMBm9DYC65nKHZg1H5t3Wzm8nRvT drn10Cpy+ulWsRXaYxlMmy/z2iyvWjsA6EhLSyndFGRWohVeu+J5bD1trcNK62dDtymR5+BD/ OKzCc9kuIBbo7nArRtzVoS6ZvaPF8It0KvtoAQA/xyC1Xcs6ujKjEZhJK1GZSffGW3L2aVp/D SxEAv45DmXhNj+jWu0nrHgnr6mGkS7KANPFXuAaIB+zTp07iZ4o69H/EmQfKdTplCPCq+8qTs AVnL+XI0UBNLWPU57Ikbu1XKIU7kegq3621mrX4tZ4veVIOPyduvBPTRz4weOuKKvlTmUbZDf cuKytlbIlRKKZjpO9AAkN3lOhKDOd33G9BFy7qhdlWFlyHcQzliGUC/qCLQ/9tLoh4M1xRoXj qemkDAgO1khiNGSd2+kFGqwCBPkCeXztxisGM1Is+omrZ67OPavpWCsUCXttFNRV1fd6fDnm7 ZJ1MNqXc8y/N2g1bfSwmhPG1WOL10P4fzjnw1LT1suy3FNO6eGSw8wlwR7kGWaXhlv9ODJCLU e4VXbzds2hfgFcN+Wh+3cnk1E3arcq1SQ2mHetNKEIb/fAoQnC0rksULQ6dHA6iMMSk50D2ih Su3lOrwKXEb4JuGHFnccQUTx36hjYRSLLWHbxvg== Cc: greg@kroah.com X-BeenThere: kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Learn about the Linux kernel List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kernelnewbies-bounces@kernelnewbies.org Hi, Greg KH wrote: > repost it and don't worry about it, maintainers get behind. Will do. > Also, I think the scsi list wants developers to help review other > patches, right? Why not help out with that while you wait for your > patches to be reviewed? My SCSI knowledge is concentrated on optical drives, which i am used to operate from userland via ioctl(SG_IO). So if it's not about cdrom or sr (or isofs), i am not qualified to have an own opinion. I saw no patch sets which would deal with my topics, other than the very broad one by Christoph Hellwig which by two patches affects sr: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/b5e51c24-b9a6-979f-8fe0-f762f113bba3@kernel.dk/T/#t I studied it, but the only thought it gave me was that my wished new ioctl had to become more independent of the entrails of general block device handling. (Now it is much leaner and less needy of justifications that it is indeed harmless.) Hm. Jens Axboe writes "Applied". Maybe i can learn to which repo and rebase my patch for that one ... Have a nice day :) Thomas _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies