From: me@tobin.cc (Tobin C. Harding)
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
Subject: dev process - reduce mistakes
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 12:15:07 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180919021507.GA12180@eros> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17185.1537315282@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 08:01:22PM -0400, valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 09:35:36 +1000, "Tobin C. Harding" said:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm after some advice from those more experienced with [kernel]
> > development please.
> >
> > What systems do you have in place to help catch mistakes? In other
> > words; what processes do you use when coding and submitting patches to
> > help eliminate simple mistakes?
>
> Same way you verify it for any other large programming project.
>
> 'make clean && make && make install && shutdown -r now'
>
> 1) Verify no compile errors.
>
> 2) Verify no unexplained compile warnings. gcc *does* screw up and whine about
> things incorrectly on occasion because it doesn't know everything - "variable
> may be used uninitialized" is a famous one, usually emitted because there's
> program logic it can't see. For instance, code like:
>
> int oddball;
> for (i=0;i<foo;i++) {
> if (wombat > 5) oddball = 7;
> if (frobozz) quux = oddball;
> }
>
> and there's a reason known to programmer but not compiler
> that guarantees that wombat > 5 will always happen at least once
> before frobozz becomes true.
>
> But in general, unless you can *prove* the compiler is false-positive on
> a warning, fix the warning. ;)
>
> 2a) (optional) Install 'sparse' and do a 'make C=2' and see if that complains about
> anything that gcc didn't...
>
> 3) Test that it actually boots and does whatever your patch is supposed to do.
>
> See? And here you thought it was difficult :)
Thanks for your response Valdis (especially the wombat reference). I'm
talking though about more brain dead mistakes like:
- Muddling up changes between patches when rebasing
- Missing an instance of a series of the same changes (usually because
you did 100 of them and one slipped past when viewing the diff)
Things that don't make the compiler or static analysis complain. I made
an improvement on my method today and that was to review patch sets
[almost] ready for submission first thing in the day so your eyes/brain
is fresh.
These sort of 'soft' ideas I'm after please. I'm sure the old fellas
have a bunch of them that they do unconsciously but any that any one can
think of would be great to hear.
thanks,
Tobin.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-19 2:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-18 23:35 dev process - reduce mistakes Tobin C. Harding
2018-09-19 0:01 ` valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu
2018-09-19 2:15 ` Tobin C. Harding [this message]
2018-09-19 2:01 ` Cindy-Sue Causey
2018-09-25 6:03 ` Tobin C. Harding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180919021507.GA12180@eros \
--to=me@tobin.cc \
--cc=kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).