From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F145C433DF for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 12:22:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shelob.surriel.com (shelob.surriel.com [96.67.55.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C7EB2084C for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 12:22:59 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1C7EB2084C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ucw.cz Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kernelnewbies-bounces@kernelnewbies.org Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=shelob.surriel.com) by shelob.surriel.com with esmtp (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1jrhBd-0005nR-4f; Sat, 04 Jul 2020 08:22:29 -0400 Received: from jabberwock.ucw.cz ([46.255.230.98]) by shelob.surriel.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1jrhBb-0005nG-5E for Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org; Sat, 04 Jul 2020 08:22:27 -0400 Received: by jabberwock.ucw.cz (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 2ACD31C0BD2; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 14:22:23 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2020 14:22:22 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: =?utf-8?B?5a2Z5LiW6b6Z?= sunshilong Subject: Re: Are there some potentially serious problems that I should be aware of if I totally disable the CONFIG_ACPI option on the X86_64 platform? Message-ID: <20200704122222.GB15530@amd> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org X-BeenThere: kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Learn about the Linux kernel List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2338439870484250101==" Errors-To: kernelnewbies-bounces@kernelnewbies.org --===============2338439870484250101== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PmA2V3Z32TCmWXqI" Content-Disposition: inline --PmA2V3Z32TCmWXqI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! > Are there some potentially serious problems that I should be aware of > if I totally disable the CONFIG_ACPI option on the X86_64 platform? >=20 > Would it do harm to the hardware? >=20 > Thank you for your attention to this matter. These machines are still mostly IBM-PC compatible, so it is likely to somehow work. You'll likely get worse power and thermal management. Try it. Pavel --=20 (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html --PmA2V3Z32TCmWXqI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAl8AdH4ACgkQMOfwapXb+vIHTwCfQ9c9KX3/EY85Gm9wwa7Aeroq ZeYAnjmKW+l83cm4l1HFOWZTiiC/wwOU =/TjJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PmA2V3Z32TCmWXqI-- --===============2338439870484250101== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies --===============2338439870484250101==--