From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4932CC4346E for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 10:34:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shelob.surriel.com (shelob.surriel.com [96.67.55.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B04D207C4 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 10:34:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=kroah.com header.i=@kroah.com header.b="iC0m4gIq"; dkim=temperror (0-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="pYe8XJg4" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9B04D207C4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kroah.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kernelnewbies-bounces@kernelnewbies.org Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=shelob.surriel.com) by shelob.surriel.com with esmtp (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1kNCxQ-0000F8-Ou; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 06:34:04 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]) by shelob.surriel.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1kNCxO-0000Ej-A0 for kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 06:34:02 -0400 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA38E5C00B0; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 06:33:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 29 Sep 2020 06:33:59 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kroah.com; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm1; bh=qL41i0+6/L19BoL+al4JPTB6yH9 UMwX4Tr52htwVHZc=; b=iC0m4gIq4KGSldzj2xWd0SSpuhzANdUv9jpRqCxzRYU J33BA6Sv+rZso5w3wJlrQsLBS1ex7dqXahNt8tEAHCHCSM2CQ4v0C+NrdblGAYaX ThtWYiIAeZcGxI9i/eg9440S1gt2OiKVEfe4cB1Awm+9C6WyW8hVfk9Z7dasuPP6 f/enmcg0LG7N6SabddMBVdN8BqOhrcc0cHHoft5k6rpLWQYlXOZMd4zVsPnLnIfF JI10jrNf+CfLVYcr6KdnYyY85y+WFYzUu5+jrKPNxSH5HNWRKJmKQzZb+ITli+/v MGe+CxQsHy8gOH8e8R3LG/GPYfU6du8IBMa+nANsHnA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=qL41i0 +6/L19BoL+al4JPTB6yH9UMwX4Tr52htwVHZc=; b=pYe8XJg4AFluUs8S20o4gt bQsmJ/NiWdY3/kI+U+qwnjthF+Z3k5ps6JFHRhBC/GrNBypALfkRfus5kRnNVigC WKGXxukcbpOyawSSIGRs5w4mISRUxlx3Xt7APUE0yztVy4gpEfDwV2xysVUmD1Mb uIacDBwkTk3khYzzZZ8zdaT1oKrLk9n9JTQyl3L0Dk4CFnIsbjAvN53t0nPpNskD Ri6564sgk5nbWgTshx3ZOeJ6uJjAPREnih/kHZbzEItVP8iC1j2+mRNS1++ZZgoO 0XdCYabVg0NXhQRuqsLtnKF0jWTY+mkSNeADq1B3fxIc0OYqyRrEMgJcA79qgQSQ == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrvdekgdeftdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehttdertd dttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefirhgvghcumffjuceoghhrvghgsehkrhhorghhrdgtohhmqeen ucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeuleeltdehkeeltefhleduuddvhfffuedvffduveegheekge eiffevheegfeetgfenucffohhmrghinhepkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgnecukfhppeekfedr keeirdejgedrieegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilh hfrhhomhepghhrvghgsehkrhhorghhrdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (83-86-74-64.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.74.64]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 19B373064610; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 06:33:59 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 12:34:05 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Thomas Schmitt Subject: Re: What to do when a patch set gets no reply for 3 weeks ? Message-ID: <20200929103405.GA954079@kroah.com> References: <20041735453424947069@scdbackup.webframe.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041735453424947069@scdbackup.webframe.org> Cc: kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org X-BeenThere: kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Learn about the Linux kernel List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kernelnewbies-bounces@kernelnewbies.org On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 12:26:20PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > i sent my first patch set three weeks ago. See: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/20200908120207.5014-1-scdbackup@gmx.net/T/#u > > It was made with > git format-patch > and sent by > git send-email > to the addresses which were proposed here. In linux-scsi it showed up > after a day. > > Then i followed the advise in Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst > "Wait for a minimum of > one week before resubmitting or pinging reviewers - possibly longer" > > Still no reply yet. Neither to my mail address nor visible in the thread > display of lore.kernel.org. > > Could some merciful person have a look at my patch set and point me to > obvious reasons why it does not get considered ? > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > If no obvious shortcomming disqualifies my patches, what to do next ? > > - Ping everybody ? > > - Repost ? repost it and don't worry about it, maintainers get behind. Also, I think the scsi list wants developers to help review other patches, right? Why not help out with that while you wait for your patches to be reviewed? thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies