From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: semen-martynov@yandex.ru (Semen Martynov)
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:00:14 +0400
Subject: No subject
In-Reply-To: <20120410160801.GA4110@pinguin>
References: <371011333994175@web111.yandex.ru>
	<439721274-1334024767-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1988734699-@b25.c12.bise7.blackberry>
	<545141334033294@web125.yandex.ru> <20120410160801.GA4110@pinguin>
Message-ID: <205551334077214@web69.yandex.ru>
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
List-Id: kernelnewbies.lists.kernelnewbies.org

Yes, this is it! Thank you!

10.04.2012, 20:08, "Vladimir Murzin" <murzin.v@gmail.com>:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:48:14AM +0600, Martynov Semen wrote:
>
>> ?<one more time in plain text>
>>
>> ?Yes, of course.
>> ?It contains only one line:
>>
>> ?obj-$(CONFIG_MY_PROCLISTOUTPUT) += proclistoutput.o
>>
>> ?and works with Kconfig
>>
>> ?config MY_PROCLISTOUTPUT
>> ?????tristate "Display a list of processes"
>> ?????default y
>> ?????---help---
>> ??????This module prints a list of processes
>>
>> ?But I'm sure that the reason is not in my file, because:
>> ?- If I put my code in a folder /drivers (and include my Makefile and Kconfig) then everything works perfectly (I can build kernel object and I can built-in my code to the kernel)
>> ?- If I put my code in a folder /samples (and include my Makefile and Kconfig) then build-in the code I can't, but with .ko it works fine...
>>
>> ?I suppose that the reason in the kernel Makefile. The root Makefile contains this code (http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/Makefile#L914)
>>
>> ?ifdef CONFIG_SAMPLES
>> ??????????$(Q)$(MAKE) $(build)=samples
>> ?endif
>>
>> ?where
>> ?$(Q) = @
>> ?$(build) = -f scripts/Makefile.build obj
>>
>> ?and further I lose understanding of the events...
>>
>> ?10.04.2012, 08:26, "Vladimir Murzin" <murzin.v@gmail.com>:
>>> ?Hi Semen
>>>
>>> ?Could you share a Makefile for your module?
>>>
>>> ?Best wishes,
>>> ?Vladimir Murzin
>>>
>>> ?-----Original Message-----
>>> ?From: Martynov Semen <semen-martynov@yandex.ru>
>>> ?Sender: kernelnewbies-bounces at kernelnewbies.org
>>> ?Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 23:56:15
>>> ?To: kernelnewbies at kernelnewbies.org<kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org>
>>> ?Subject: No subject
>>>
>>> ?Good afternoon,
>>>
>>> ?I would like to understand, why I can't make the built-in object, when my code is in a folder /samples...
>>>
>>> ?I have my module-code and if I put it in a folder /samples, I can receive only loadable module (.ko) but if I want to receive the built-in object - it turns out nothing (.?-file is created, but my code doesn't get in a kernel). When I allocate my module-code in any other folder (for example, /drivers) it works normally - I can receive .ko and I can make the built-in object.
>>>
>>> ?Question - why I can't receive the built-in object when my code is in the folder /samples? What instruction in a make-file restricts it, and how?
>>>
>>> ?P.S.: Sorry for my english.
>>> ?--
>>> ?Best regards,
>>> ?Semen A Martynov.
>>>
>>> ?Saint Petersburg, Russia.
>>> ?https://www.facebook.com/semen.martynov
>>>
>>> ?_______________________________________________
>>> ?Kernelnewbies mailing list
>>> ?Kernelnewbies at kernelnewbies.org
>>> ?http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
>> ?--
>>
>> ?? ?? Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1095131825
>
> Hi Semen
>
> It happens because ./script isn't listed as a subdir for visiting and
> linking objects into vmlinux. Please, refer to [1] for details.
>
> [1] http://lxr.linux.no/linux+*/Makefile#L508
>
> Best wishes,
> Vladimir Murzin

-- 
Best regards,
Semen A Martynov.

Saint Petersburg, Russia.
https://www.facebook.com/semen.martynov