From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 702B5C433E0 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 05:30:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shelob.surriel.com (shelob.surriel.com [96.67.55.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 323522063A for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 05:30:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="W3N/K/1K" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 323522063A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kernelnewbies-bounces@kernelnewbies.org Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=shelob.surriel.com) by shelob.surriel.com with esmtp (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1jtlbW-0006Pu-DJ; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 01:29:46 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-x82d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::82d]) by shelob.surriel.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1jtlbT-0006Po-Ol for Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 01:29:43 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-x82d.google.com with SMTP id a32so3564821qtb.5 for ; Thu, 09 Jul 2020 22:29:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=s/scwtooOCExxZ2jY+qUy7/rDidk1N21p8LTNAzkr+0=; b=W3N/K/1K8ir1G6TvphEzLLjRxR59UNEGJ88yvyq1Qe0jXbhE5td1h2ztbt7OmPlv+U A+qGLvH+bk7eJo7HMe/gdeQMQsmcUTp4gnJdhxRTGVg4EE3/ebRrgLLnDlNqZ+kH3F0Y ljtJ9tGBsAXLKrhO3kbS9HNd0hWp5T+gWmUVW74Oggut2GXQpxe6oEfVU2awxp9aQ0fY R/TIkAdEYRJlzvdB18KiA4yh7ZjanpGKKNCcgmK+hKmrLD1XSv0lDMOLy++8QtngNz9l dTgEvWch3dEdZZgGh8v0Yk3Mm28OOP2y813du8kfDFIDZtn+dQHGWrqT7WAvKctQmRNw dByg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=s/scwtooOCExxZ2jY+qUy7/rDidk1N21p8LTNAzkr+0=; b=VUDM8Ix81oT5Hz3Dbtto3u6V+pHrgtau7GTbip2d6O2caD15M3wQHgciw1YJ1WFTfW +b77sjeWH503yEicZ9TvJSs3PbqFhlVOZnGcy29RPPki8JoFBIgFzZslgleVmzQfIl4n yiLj4qPTYPf0f788NJRHec2PT18Kn0IsgSk7mp5OWbq4p5cq9PCtxugUgkWSaRRmQhzZ f6ky4IE3PeXlBHcSmlxQ6TGMDTbownTU3lWp2ZYspkPKRb3xFDqjaAnVpfRQRimm45yv N19el/+KvwKMOeNGAkjw89Kb8P04kCo3J0kYUdCMaAEMeGAeIDYmvd6yBUPC6GhmkWBy PU3w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53047QuxwZkFAsCik4ZvlhcLRm0GAccRgn/N6MrPs3ImKY8Z3XId jDJUApFWIhrVjA1tKHvnD1YTk1UIkuvM4SKuDkrKM47tMQvYrg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzrKfW0fSvx5ebKKCTEI8Hdc5QtBQwRtM2ANn8GgYlBELtn1+kRdhHoFzVh3aq3RzPc8927HzNM33r9N+rBlZk= X-Received: by 2002:aed:2e07:: with SMTP id j7mr72826752qtd.338.1594358981087; Thu, 09 Jul 2020 22:29:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: =?UTF-8?B?5a2Z5LiW6b6ZIHN1bnNoaWxvbmc=?= Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 13:29:29 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Why are there "" and "" in the call trace section? What does them imply? To: kernelnewbies X-BeenThere: kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Learn about the Linux kernel List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kernelnewbies-bounces@kernelnewbies.org Hi, list As the subject, here is the related log: [72873.713472] Call Trace: [72873.713473] [72873.713474] switch_mm_irqs_off+0x31b/0x4e0 [72873.713475] xnarch_switch_to+0x2f/0x80 [72873.713476] ___xnsched_run.part.74+0x154/0x480 [72873.713476] ___xnsched_run+0x35/0x50 [72873.713477] xnintr_irq_handler+0x346/0x4c0 [72873.713478] ? xnintr_core_clock_handler+0x1b6/0x360 [72873.713479] dispatch_irq_head+0x8e/0x110 [72873.713479] ? xnintr_irq_handler+0x5/0x4c0 [72873.713481] ? dispatch_irq_head+0x8e/0x110 [72873.713482] __ipipe_dispatch_irq+0xd9/0x1c0 [72873.713483] __ipipe_handle_irq+0x86/0x1e0 [72873.713483] common_interrupt+0xf/0x2c [72873.713484] Maybe, the later one(i.e. ) implies there was an interrupt request and the common_interuppt() function handler it. Am I right? But what about the former one(i.e. )? Thank you for your attention to this matter. _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies