Yeap! That solved the problem. Seems I was not using correctly the
checkpatch.pl file. My bad.

Now everything seems to be working fine.

Thanks for the help!

El mar., 3 sept. 2019 a las 7:21, Valdis Klētnieks (<valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu>)
escribió:

> On Tue, 03 Sep 2019 01:26:17 -0300, Pablo Pellecchia said:
>
> > *WARNING: struct  should normally be const#9: FILE:
> > platform_net.h:9:+struct xlr_net_data {*
> >
> > A similar issue is reported when we declare a variable of type struct
> > <something>, but in this case warning is reported on the struct
> definition
> > itself.
> >
> > How can we fix this?
>
> And in today's "How to debug checkpatch" lesson.. :)
>
> First, figure out if checkpatch is in fact correct. It' just a Perl script,
> and has no real idea of what the code is.
>
> And double-checking, there's very few 'const struct' declarations in
> include/linux/*.h.
>
> So what's going on?  Good question. Actually looking at checkpatch.pl,
> we find:
>
> # check for various structs that are normally const (ops, kgdb,
> device_tree)
> # and avoid what seem like struct definitions 'struct foo {'
>                 if ($line !~ /\bconst\b/ &&
>                     $line =~ /\bstruct\s+($const_structs)\b(?!\s*\{)/) {
>                         WARN("CONST_STRUCT",
>                              "struct $1 should normally be const\n" .
> $herecurr);
>                 }
>
> and $const_structs is initialized from scripts/const_structs.checkpatch
> And that tells us 2 things:  First, this should only be triggering for
> structures
> that are listed in that file, and the message *should* say something
> like 'struct foo should normally be const', with $1 filling in the struct
> name.
>
> So why is $1 not showing up? Damned good question.  And the file
> checks just fine for me.
>
> [/usr/src/linux-next]2 scripts/checkpatch.pl -f
> drivers/staging/netlogic/platform_net.h
> total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 21 lines checked
>
> drivers/staging/netlogic/platform_net.h has no obvious style problems and
> is ready for submission.
>
> Bingo!  This is what happens if the permissions on the file are messed up
> and it can't read the file:
>
> [/usr/src/linux-next] scripts/checkpatch.pl -f
> drivers/staging/netlogic/platform_net.h
> No structs that should be const will be found - file
> '/usr/src/linux-next/scripts/const_structs.checkpatch': Permission denied
> WARNING: struct  should normally be const
> #9: FILE: drivers/staging/netlogic/platform_net.h:9:
> +struct xlr_net_data {
>
> So... you probably need to check the permissions, or if the file is missing
> from your tree or empty or something. The version in my tree is 64 lines
> long.
>
> Meanwhile, I'm going to go cook up a patch for this....
>
>
>