* process descriptor address in kernel stack
@ 2020-03-19 8:53 , Samuel
2020-03-19 9:22 ` Valdis Klētnieks
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: , Samuel @ 2020-03-19 8:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernelnewbies
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 882 bytes --]
In this book (understanding Linux kernel),
the kernel can easily obtain the address of the thread_info structure of
the process currently running on a CPU from the value of the esp register.
In fact, if the thread_union structure is 8 KB (213 bytes) long, the kernel
masks out the 13 least significant bits of esp to obtain the base address
of the thread_info structure; on the other hand, if the thread_union struc-
ture is 4 KB long, the kernel masks out the 12 least significant bits of
esp. This is done by the current_thread_info() function, which produces
assembly language instructions like the following:
movl $0xffffe000,%ecx or 0xfffff000 for 4KB stacks
andl %esp,%ecx
movl %ecx,p
Why is *"stack pointer(esp) & 0xffffe000"* equal to the process descriptor
base address?
That means the base address of process descriptor is always *0xXYZ...000*,
right? It is weird.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3423 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 170 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org
https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: process descriptor address in kernel stack
2020-03-19 8:53 process descriptor address in kernel stack , Samuel
@ 2020-03-19 9:22 ` Valdis Klētnieks
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Valdis Klētnieks @ 2020-03-19 9:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: , Samuel; +Cc: kernelnewbies
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1250 bytes --]
On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 16:53:32 +0800, ", Samuel" said:
> movl $0xffffe000,%ecx or 0xfffff000 for 4KB stacks
> andl %esp,%ecx
> movl %ecx,p
>
> Why is *"stack pointer(esp) & 0xffffe000"* equal to the process descriptor
> base address?
>
> That means the base address of process descriptor is always *0xXYZ...000*,
> right? It is weird.
It's not at all weird if the kernel, when allocating the stack space to begin with,
asked for 1 (or 2 contiguous) 4K chunks of memory, at a page-aligned address....
For example, see kernel/fork.c:
238 /*
239 * Allocated stacks are cached and later reused by new threads,
240 * so memcg accounting is performed manually on assigning/releasing
241 * stacks to tasks. Drop __GFP_ACCOUNT.
242 */
243 stack = __vmalloc_node_range(THREAD_SIZE, THREAD_ALIGN,
244 VMALLOC_START, VMALLOC_END,
245 THREADINFO_GFP & ~__GFP_ACCOUNT,
246 PAGE_KERNEL,
247 0, node, __builtin_return_address(0));
I'll leave figuring out what THREAD_ALIGN is set to, as an exercise for the student. :)
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 170 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org
https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-03-19 9:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-03-19 8:53 process descriptor address in kernel stack , Samuel
2020-03-19 9:22 ` Valdis Klētnieks
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).