Kernel Newbies archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: anish singh <anish198519851985@gmail.com>
To: primoz.beltram@gmail.com
Cc: kernelnewbies <kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org>
Subject: Re: I2C bus driver TIMEDOUT because of PM autosuspend
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2019 17:30:10 -0800
Message-ID: <CAK7N6vqafbgeo+bocur1g=Yf-OPyPyfhHR06SVBWzXRXOJt=0w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83466c12-9329-dbee-1751-6f7717210f4f@gmail.com>

On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 12:53 PM Primoz Beltram
<primoz.beltram@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I am analysing a problem with I2C bus driver where the problem shows up
> as I2C bus completely blocked. The LX driver in question is
> /drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-xiic.c.
> Problem is difficult to reproduce, it happens very rarely. So far I saw
> that the main precondition is to have very heavy I2C traffic on bus.
> In my case this is achieved/reproduced via netdev driving SFP LEDs via
> /sys/class/leds/ (via gpio-pca953x). I generate traffic with iperf3.
> Network traffic is on 10Gbps EMAC. LX kernel is 4.14.0.
> What I saw from debugging this problem is that I2C bus get blocked when
> wait_event_timeout() completes because of timeout. The timeout handling
> in this driver is probably not robust enough (bus should not remain
> blocked), but at this moment this are just my speculations (don't know
> enough details).

Check with salea logic analyzer what happens to the i2c bus.

>
> Looking the driver code and data on oscilloscope, I saw that SCL in
> single I2C data transfer sequence can be interrupted for very long
> delays, e.g up to hundredths of usec (SCL is 100kHz). I started to
> suspect that PM autosuspend delay could play some role here. There are
> only two delays in driver code, first in wait_event_timeout and second
> in set autosuspend delay. Case is a bit strange because in very busy I2C
> traffic, PM autosuspend should not be triggered at all. Additionally, if
> I lower PM timeout, e.g. from 1000 (default) to 100, I hit the problem
> sooner (waits for problem hit are in order of n*10minutes).
>
> It looks to me that PM autosupend is playing some role here.
>
> Power management options in my .config:
> # CONFIG_SUSPEND is not set
> # CONFIG_PM is not set
> CONFIG_ARCH_SUSPEND_POSSIBLE=y
>
> I intentionally did not put all detail descriptions of embedded system
> and test setup here (long list), because the main reason of this post is:
>
> The workaround that works for me/customer (at the moment) is to disable
> PM autosuspend in the driver code, either by incerementing PM delay from
> 1000 to 10000 or by disabling autosuspend (comment out call to
> pm_runtime_put_autosuspend() in xiic_xfer()).
>
> But, I would like to expose/discuss this issue (maintainer of the code,
> or others).
> The reason/source of the problem can be much more complex and in some
> other place.
>
> So my question is who should I contact, is this the M: in the
> MAINTAINERS list, the MODULE_AUTHOR, ...?

You can certainly add the author in loop but I am afraid
you won't get any help as this would be specific to your board. So,
best is to check soc vendor who has written your i2c
bus driver or it could be a issue with your i2c client in that
case show them your salea logic analyzer logs to see
if they can figure out anything wrong.

> How to proceed.
>
> WBR Primoz
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kernelnewbies mailing list
> Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org
> https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies

_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org
https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies

  reply index

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-21 16:59 Primoz Beltram
2019-12-03  1:30 ` anish singh [this message]
2019-12-03  9:26   ` Primoz Beltram
2019-11-27 14:49 Primoz Beltram

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAK7N6vqafbgeo+bocur1g=Yf-OPyPyfhHR06SVBWzXRXOJt=0w@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=anish198519851985@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org \
    --cc=primoz.beltram@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Kernel Newbies archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/kernelnewbies/0 kernelnewbies/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 kernelnewbies kernelnewbies/ https://lore.kernel.org/kernelnewbies \
		kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org
	public-inbox-index kernelnewbies

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernelnewbies.kernelnewbies


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git