From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from shelob.surriel.com (shelob.surriel.com [96.67.55.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F846C00140 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2022 07:06:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=shelob.surriel.com) by shelob.surriel.com with esmtp (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1oKwqb-00036t-15; Mon, 08 Aug 2022 03:06:45 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x630.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::630]) by shelob.surriel.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1oKwqY-00036H-Bj for kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2022 03:06:42 -0400 Received: by mail-ej1-x630.google.com with SMTP id uj29so15016660ejc.0 for ; Mon, 08 Aug 2022 00:06:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc; bh=a/grQFCJz2PFBc9LY8wgH3lSPAEdbuSBZNAKOKiOEYc=; b=km0gztEMDpImfFaXSoHNkKY5Gh3z+Tutcqyz/Y4ex3H4gXvPwC0+M33/WmqR07TC4/ MYgCzBPbFffkAHEiwB7pStumRC3gYhIC5qwB5jSPoKP9NMGCF2xuQAO97ADL1eXVBdNK 305WKTemJ475TUeE6UI1wd0eV3ovg/L0QphrJCrTkx0jv3ulgzsFdIBo4anIHyPLRWnv JdN8dk5dzdqz6qkBLVQAarfRu1e5dpGRiZD0bXwTkkRAs9qCH3NG2evXpOYsU7rtzOaC HrHf3TpLZjETc53XbOBzfaPXFM2x4dYyCdtRSFBbaPkEhP017vzTihMenuGdlsKUJycN B8+w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=a/grQFCJz2PFBc9LY8wgH3lSPAEdbuSBZNAKOKiOEYc=; b=NbTdzUtDsfLGUg2roCfEAfck4enZIw7Gn5wpYDTRzFBo1CmGqiY0VqOiCJhhiVzqvt SEb9ZDYzbEF5//2uWFvlC04sgrg3QaGKSLJyNIbmKj83WK6AN+J5KiQUa1IOOKJt2/LZ 0HFqqTKIhbSPIccu7qfSrj6DWEyaFzQm1xAyGdWCvEWAmtqIZEewUkP03bY19TNfb669 dLp7WYPP1t8tQrPl6COT5f81ho6APUy5v/V7GRjr+TakcesPCpG5uHy6GbNG3eLfLUcG zaUrkapjVebXGj/ANeEojnK6gWFOYN2mlhJ71VyhGxg6ckVsXKIYo1sLzsT0p9BNsW41 zoRw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo2fASOr83OQWwk6TFYXdQDdnoQj+7U0zgmMil34NrgT6P/WZCi+ Ndbu6jVFcBl0YJEoCwL3tB17kyKvxNE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR4sh2LNwPMETEk5IF+g8BBHpsgg9K3PSDRNPKrCIcM6AdwbHh2eH7xXpbpBcIBzbddfbt39dg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:7b95:b0:731:113a:d7a2 with SMTP id ne21-20020a1709077b9500b00731113ad7a2mr7680735ejc.377.1659942399943; Mon, 08 Aug 2022 00:06:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2003:c7:8f2e:6928:9f97:e6fe:c4ca:4651? (p200300c78f2e69289f97e6fec4ca4651.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:c7:8f2e:6928:9f97:e6fe:c4ca:4651]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d4-20020a056402000400b004404e290e7esm4177665edu.77.2022.08.08.00.06.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 08 Aug 2022 00:06:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2022 09:06:38 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0 Subject: Re: What is the right thing to do if a patch got ignored? Content-Language: en-US To: Adverg Ebashinskii , kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org References: <924111659902451@mail.yandex.ru> From: Philipp Hortmann In-Reply-To: <924111659902451@mail.yandex.ru> X-BeenThere: kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Learn about the Linux kernel List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: kernelnewbies-bounces@kernelnewbies.org On 8/7/22 22:05, Adverg Ebashinskii wrote: > What is the right things to do if a patch got ignored? Is it appropriate > to request a feedback by explicitly replying to the thread or ignoring > the patch automatically means that it was rejected? If it's possible to > request a feedback how long should I before doing that? I'd like to > request a feedback to understand what was wrong about the patch to not > do the same mistake when submitting a patch next time. > Thanks, > Adverg Please send a link of the patch you are referring to. Starting with https://lore.kernel.org/. Thanks Philipp _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies