From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Coiby Xu <coxu@redhat.com>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@suse.de>, Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Chun-Yi Lee <jlee@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/4] use more system keyrings to verify arm64 and s390 kexec kernel image signature
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 08:06:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c17e61cc155d7af4bbfc3fcb7671b6a8efd4ba4d.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220616012128.7ufebi2lkusx5aga@Rk>
On Thu, 2022-06-16 at 09:21 +0800, Coiby Xu wrote:
> Hi Mimi,
>
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 11:35:13AM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> >Hi Coiby,
> >
> >On Fri, 2022-05-27 at 21:43 +0800, Coiby Xu wrote:
> >> It seems I need to only change cover letter and commit message i.e.
> >> there is no concern about the code. So it's better to provide a
> >> new cover letter here to collect new feedback from you thus we
> >> can avoid unnecessary rounds of patch set.
> >
> >One other thing before re-posting, the existing Subject line is a bit
> >snarky. Perhaps you could come with a more appropriate title?
>
> How about "Using the same keyrings as x86 to verify kexec'ed kernel image
> signature for arm64 and s390" or "Uniform keyrings to verify kexec'ed
> kernel image signature across x86, arm64 and s390"?
Instead of using "Uniform", I would use the verb form "Unify".
Mimi
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-17 12:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-12 7:01 [PATCH v8 0/4] use more system keyrings to verify arm64 and s390 kexec kernel image signature Coiby Xu
2022-05-12 7:01 ` [PATCH v8 1/4] kexec: clean up arch_kexec_kernel_verify_sig Coiby Xu
2022-06-09 21:57 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-05-12 7:01 ` [PATCH v8 2/4] kexec, KEYS: make the code in bzImage64_verify_sig generic Coiby Xu
2022-05-12 7:21 ` Baoquan He
2022-06-09 22:18 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-06-16 1:47 ` Coiby Xu
2022-05-12 7:01 ` [PATCH v8 3/4] arm64: kexec_file: use more system keyrings to verify kernel image signature Coiby Xu
2022-06-09 23:15 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-06-16 1:22 ` Coiby Xu
2022-06-17 9:34 ` Michal Suchánek
2022-05-12 7:01 ` [PATCH v8 4/4] kexec, KEYS, s390: Make use of built-in and secondary keyring for signature verification Coiby Xu
2022-05-18 11:29 ` Heiko Carstens
2022-05-19 0:39 ` Baoquan He
2022-05-19 11:56 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-05-19 14:22 ` Baoquan He
2022-05-19 17:11 ` Michal =?unknown-8bit?q?Such=C3=A1nek?=
2022-06-16 1:46 ` Coiby Xu
2022-05-20 17:04 ` [PATCH v8 0/4] use more system keyrings to verify arm64 and s390 kexec kernel image signature Mimi Zohar
2022-05-25 9:59 ` Coiby Xu
2022-05-25 13:30 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-05-27 13:43 ` Coiby Xu
2022-05-27 16:45 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-06-16 1:15 ` Coiby Xu
2022-06-17 3:57 ` Coiby Xu
2022-06-17 11:58 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-06-20 13:14 ` Coiby Xu
2022-06-09 15:35 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-06-16 1:21 ` Coiby Xu
2022-06-17 12:06 ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c17e61cc155d7af4bbfc3fcb7671b6a8efd4ba4d.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=coxu@redhat.com \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=jlee@suse.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=msuchanek@suse.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).