ksummit.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laura Abbott <laura@labbott.name>
To: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: ksummit@lists.linux.dev,
	"tech-board-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org"
	<tech-board-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Subject: Re: [Tech-board-discuss] Reminder: Voting procedures for the Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 16:42:43 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <00b4158c-a0c8-b4c2-a0e5-3c646079393a@labbott.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9af9f018-5df5-f5d6-5472-2387c1bb594a@linuxfoundation.org>

On 9/15/21 15:34, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 9/15/21 10:13 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> Hi Laura,
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 12:07:13PM -0400, Laura Abbott wrote:
>>> On 9/15/21 10:46, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 10:36:45AM -0400, Laura Abbott wrote:
>>>>> On 9/15/21 10:07, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 09:58:32AM -0400, Laura Abbott wrote:
>>>>>>> On 9/9/21 12:49, Laura Abbott wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Reminder that the Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board 
>>>>>>>> (TAB) annual
>>>>>>>> election will be held virtually during the 2021 Kernel Summit 
>>>>>>>> and Linux
>>>>>>>> Plumbers Conference. Voting will run from September 20th to 
>>>>>>>> September
>>>>>>>> 23rd 16:00 GMT-4 (US/Eastern). The voting criteria for the 2021 
>>>>>>>> election
>>>>>>>> are:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There exist three kernel commits in a mainline or stable released
>>>>>>>> kernel that both
>>>>>>>> - Have a commit date in the year 2020 or 2021
>>>>>>>> - Contain an e-mail address in one of the following tags or merged
>>>>>>>> tags (e.g. Reviewed-and-tested-by)
>>>>>>>> -- Signed-off-by
>>>>>>>> -- Tested-by
>>>>>>>> -- Reported-by
>>>>>>>> -- Reviewed-by
>>>>>>>> -- Acked-by
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you have more than 50 commits that meet this requirement you 
>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>> receive a ballot automatically.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you have between 3 and 49 commits that meet this requirement 
>>>>>>>> please
>>>>>>>> e-mail tab-elections@lists.linuxfoundation.org to request your 
>>>>>>>> ballot.
>>>>>>>> We strongly encourage everyone who meets this criteria to request a
>>>>>>>> ballot.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We will be using Condorcet Internet Voting
>>>>>>>> Service (CIVS) https://civs1.civs.us/ . This is a voting service
>>>>>>>> focused on security and privacy. There are sample polls on the
>>>>>>>> website if you would like to see what a ballot will look like.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you have any questions please e-mail
>>>>>>>> tab-elections@lists.linuxfoundation.org.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Laura
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> P.S. Please also consider this another reminder to consider 
>>>>>>>> running for
>>>>>>>> the TAB as well
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Final reminder: please remember to request your ballot for the TAB
>>>>>>> elections. If you know others who are eligible please encourage
>>>>>>> them to request a ballot as well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When are the ballots supposed to be sent ? It would be nice to avoid
>>>>>> requiring everybody to check whether they're below or above the 50
>>>>>> commits threshold manually :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> The ballots will be sent sometime after Monday September 20th
>>>>> 9:00am GMT-4 (US/Eastern).
>>>>>
>>>>> I did make an attempt to send e-mails to the > 50 commits individuals
>>>>> but there is a chance my e-mail got eaten by spam filters or just
>>>>> didn't get sent out. I discovered Google Apps' e-mail limits and
>>>>> that you should not attempt to bcc too many people. This is something
>>>>> I'd like to handle in a more automated fashion next year to make
>>>>> it easier for both voters and those running the elections.
>>>>
>>>> Does it mean I should ask for a ballot after the 20th if I don't get
>>>> one, or request one *before* ? I meet the above criteria but haven't
>>>> received any ballot yet, so I was unsure whether I should ask or wait.
>>>
>>> The intention was that if you were in the range of between 3-49 commits
>>> you would ask for a ballot now.
>>
>> Would it be possible to share the script that you are using to check in
>> which category a developer is, to avoid the criteria being applied in
>> slightly different ways ?
>>
> 
> Same request. Is this the same script that gets used to determine candidate
> eligibility before they get added to the ballot?
> 
> thanks,
> -- Shuah

You can thank Kees for the script

https://github.com/kees/kernel-tools/blob/trunk/identity-canonicalizer

This is the same script for both voting and nomination

The set generated is

# Find people participating in 50+ commits since 2020-01-01:
git log --since=2020-01-01 | ~/bin/identity-canonicalizer | sort -g > 
contributors.txt
cat contributors.txt | awk '{if ($1 > 2) {print $0}}' >eligible.txt
cat eligible.txt | awk '{if ($1 > 49) {print $0}}' >ballots.txt

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-15 20:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-09 16:49 Laura Abbott
2021-09-15 13:58 ` Laura Abbott
2021-09-15 14:07   ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-09-15 14:36     ` Laura Abbott
2021-09-15 14:39       ` James Bottomley
2021-09-15 14:46       ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-09-15 16:07         ` Laura Abbott
2021-09-15 16:13           ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-09-15 19:34             ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Shuah Khan
2021-09-15 20:42               ` Laura Abbott [this message]
2021-09-15 21:11                 ` Shuah Khan
2021-09-15 21:20                   ` Laura Abbott
2021-09-15 15:49       ` Johannes Berg
2021-09-15 16:11         ` Laura Abbott
2021-09-15 16:12           ` Johannes Berg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=00b4158c-a0c8-b4c2-a0e5-3c646079393a@labbott.name \
    --to=laura@labbott.name \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=ksummit@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=tech-board-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --subject='Re: [Tech-board-discuss] Reminder: Voting procedures for the Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).