From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-qk1-f178.google.com (mail-qk1-f178.google.com [209.85.222.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 891FE3FC3 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 20:42:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk1-f178.google.com with SMTP id a10so4962411qka.12 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 13:42:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labbott.name; s=google; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :cc:references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lp9BcrYEoWKcuQnHekVsPUayGkvggC22Su0oQv+i85o=; b=GiWElmFJzNdwHBE9n+AZPKP9386jxN7qdlvv3UBVhj+z5A/iDrAX03QjSP1NCw5ynd qI45NbMiQHt4gEW6Jr/NECVdE5hEBgQxZxk0KDZJpmBVeD+jtwgsk1ijU+fPLLo8cs6a CPWSd4Gg+tKBwS6njE6w4osrVPymnGft1Md8g= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=lp9BcrYEoWKcuQnHekVsPUayGkvggC22Su0oQv+i85o=; b=1JM6AVqR3L791B7jelbo38a0o+4Anui7i3ro6y+8guhVPxesLRNHCcFvEsSXRuFxxc 0wiXTeqETrgQjCqcm7y1zCz3FvehZ6wpmvUEH6cfq2kMFxeStg4aJpgUCZDDI2sFmolN WG3Eyqrxa69dlt8Dv8JFrA694wqVM6/g9FI8SzGNbuNhVAA/tbXVRSZrwOe8NG4pmzHP VAzoHvHp5P0xkFzEuutp3fUz2bqyUw87QygN8DqQwYuMRPLmtZJb4NZHYr4EFyJuW9rl zl0kWj38r066MNOz4vHd4W4jMVpL0yZjTnpj/pbryuXMnOeB91DVArwva35GdPyid8nG hcEg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532vnlCyWobNjmOWxmVCg3U4lL3uHflQ4/tmp9HbFpd0flNPtLmw X5zIoK2QIXJk9CSXU3N0YYbbjQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJylOsgGJRsV5S4hRGcjaKmzLzjQCYf6UZtfdCp568buUXfjwXEVvu2eiMPGV2InwyKcZNDXoQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:f8a:: with SMTP id b10mr1905150qkn.424.1631738564361; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 13:42:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.168] (pool-74-109-246-95.pitbpa.fios.verizon.net. [74.109.246.95]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c15sm819419qka.46.2021.09.15.13.42.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 15 Sep 2021 13:42:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <00b4158c-a0c8-b4c2-a0e5-3c646079393a@labbott.name> Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 16:42:43 -0400 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: ksummit@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.1.0 Subject: Re: [Tech-board-discuss] Reminder: Voting procedures for the Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Content-Language: en-US To: Shuah Khan , Laurent Pinchart Cc: ksummit@lists.linux.dev, "tech-board-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Johannes Berg References: <90e00588-3596-01f5-e5a0-73516224b883@labbott.name> <9af9f018-5df5-f5d6-5472-2387c1bb594a@linuxfoundation.org> From: Laura Abbott In-Reply-To: <9af9f018-5df5-f5d6-5472-2387c1bb594a@linuxfoundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 9/15/21 15:34, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 9/15/21 10:13 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: >> Hi Laura, >> >> On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 12:07:13PM -0400, Laura Abbott wrote: >>> On 9/15/21 10:46, Laurent Pinchart wrote: >>>> On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 10:36:45AM -0400, Laura Abbott wrote: >>>>> On 9/15/21 10:07, Laurent Pinchart wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 09:58:32AM -0400, Laura Abbott wrote: >>>>>>> On 9/9/21 12:49, Laura Abbott wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Reminder that the Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board >>>>>>>> (TAB) annual >>>>>>>> election will be held virtually during the 2021 Kernel Summit >>>>>>>> and Linux >>>>>>>> Plumbers Conference. Voting will run from September 20th to >>>>>>>> September >>>>>>>> 23rd 16:00 GMT-4 (US/Eastern). The voting criteria for the 2021 >>>>>>>> election >>>>>>>> are: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There exist three kernel commits in a mainline or stable released >>>>>>>> kernel that both >>>>>>>> - Have a commit date in the year 2020 or 2021 >>>>>>>> - Contain an e-mail address in one of the following tags or merged >>>>>>>> tags (e.g. Reviewed-and-tested-by) >>>>>>>> -- Signed-off-by >>>>>>>> -- Tested-by >>>>>>>> -- Reported-by >>>>>>>> -- Reviewed-by >>>>>>>> -- Acked-by >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If you have more than 50 commits that meet this requirement you >>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>> receive a ballot automatically. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If you have between 3 and 49 commits that meet this requirement >>>>>>>> please >>>>>>>> e-mail tab-elections@lists.linuxfoundation.org to request your >>>>>>>> ballot. >>>>>>>> We strongly encourage everyone who meets this criteria to request a >>>>>>>> ballot. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We will be using Condorcet Internet Voting >>>>>>>> Service (CIVS) https://civs1.civs.us/ . This is a voting service >>>>>>>> focused on security and privacy. There are sample polls on the >>>>>>>> website if you would like to see what a ballot will look like. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If you have any questions please e-mail >>>>>>>> tab-elections@lists.linuxfoundation.org. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> Laura >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> P.S. Please also consider this another reminder to consider >>>>>>>> running for >>>>>>>> the TAB as well >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Final reminder: please remember to request your ballot for the TAB >>>>>>> elections. If you know others who are eligible please encourage >>>>>>> them to request a ballot as well. >>>>>> >>>>>> When are the ballots supposed to be sent ? It would be nice to avoid >>>>>> requiring everybody to check whether they're below or above the 50 >>>>>> commits threshold manually :-) >>>>> >>>>> The ballots will be sent sometime after Monday September 20th >>>>> 9:00am GMT-4 (US/Eastern). >>>>> >>>>> I did make an attempt to send e-mails to the > 50 commits individuals >>>>> but there is a chance my e-mail got eaten by spam filters or just >>>>> didn't get sent out. I discovered Google Apps' e-mail limits and >>>>> that you should not attempt to bcc too many people. This is something >>>>> I'd like to handle in a more automated fashion next year to make >>>>> it easier for both voters and those running the elections. >>>> >>>> Does it mean I should ask for a ballot after the 20th if I don't get >>>> one, or request one *before* ? I meet the above criteria but haven't >>>> received any ballot yet, so I was unsure whether I should ask or wait. >>> >>> The intention was that if you were in the range of between 3-49 commits >>> you would ask for a ballot now. >> >> Would it be possible to share the script that you are using to check in >> which category a developer is, to avoid the criteria being applied in >> slightly different ways ? >> > > Same request. Is this the same script that gets used to determine candidate > eligibility before they get added to the ballot? > > thanks, > -- Shuah You can thank Kees for the script https://github.com/kees/kernel-tools/blob/trunk/identity-canonicalizer This is the same script for both voting and nomination The set generated is # Find people participating in 50+ commits since 2020-01-01: git log --since=2020-01-01 | ~/bin/identity-canonicalizer | sort -g > contributors.txt cat contributors.txt | awk '{if ($1 > 2) {print $0}}' >eligible.txt cat eligible.txt | awk '{if ($1 > 49) {print $0}}' >ballots.txt