From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49AB0C433E5 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 15:06:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from silver.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C5B9205CB for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 15:06:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=hansenpartnership.com header.i=@hansenpartnership.com header.b="Vj+10LYg"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=hansenpartnership.com header.i=@hansenpartnership.com header.b="Vj+10LYg" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1C5B9205CB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=HansenPartnership.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ksummit-discuss-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by silver.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A870263F5; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 15:06:56 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from silver.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 189nfY5bqk3E; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 15:06:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.linuxfoundation.org (lf-lists.osuosl.org [140.211.9.56]) by silver.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B75DF25DCD; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 15:06:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lf-lists.osuosl.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87BDAC088E; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 15:06:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from silver.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 720BBC0733; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 15:06:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by silver.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 572D726284; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 15:06:54 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from silver.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aXqWBjWfEjAS; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 15:06:53 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com (bedivere.hansenpartnership.com [66.63.167.143]) by silver.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC1EA25DCD; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 15:06:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bedivere.hansenpartnership.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C81808EE2A2; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 08:06:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=hansenpartnership.com; s=20151216; t=1594652812; bh=Wv28Q89o7zHc6Vbye8fvipuLhXUbfn/tNh6dihLUgYo=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Vj+10LYgvpVxNV9mMHAIMEKUcWsvjvWTiCRT2Rc4m2JcWnKIBuHWwKXmcOSeUUSB0 qhfLGQC0oyEWNdy3sXjvAiZV+zsO56kgfmlTqeIwMK9hjiGkF7K+kF9YBYT6JIPtl8 U8UwpMMyjSHTiLyPKQ18A+/rfrsdNFJXA8xXCqes= Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bedivere.hansenpartnership.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IwuWQz25J0Fo; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 08:06:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [153.66.254.194] (unknown [50.35.76.230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bedivere.hansenpartnership.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1758B8EE051; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 08:06:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=hansenpartnership.com; s=20151216; t=1594652812; bh=Wv28Q89o7zHc6Vbye8fvipuLhXUbfn/tNh6dihLUgYo=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Vj+10LYgvpVxNV9mMHAIMEKUcWsvjvWTiCRT2Rc4m2JcWnKIBuHWwKXmcOSeUUSB0 qhfLGQC0oyEWNdy3sXjvAiZV+zsO56kgfmlTqeIwMK9hjiGkF7K+kF9YBYT6JIPtl8 U8UwpMMyjSHTiLyPKQ18A+/rfrsdNFJXA8xXCqes= Message-ID: <1594652811.3750.7.camel@HansenPartnership.com> From: James Bottomley To: Takashi Iwai , Dan Williams Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 08:06:51 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: <159423201991.2466245.8461410729774664077.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.26.6 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , SeongJae Park , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tech-board-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Dave Airlie , Christian Brauner , Dan Carpenter Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [Tech-board-discuss] [PATCH v3] CodingStyle: Inclusive Terminology X-BeenThere: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ksummit-discuss-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org Sender: "Ksummit-discuss" On Mon, 2020-07-13 at 10:02 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > On Wed, 08 Jul 2020 20:14:27 +0200, > Dan Williams wrote: > > > > +Recommended replacements for 'blacklist/whitelist' are: > > + 'denylist / allowlist' > > + 'blocklist / passlist' > > I started looking through the tree now and noticed there are lots of > patterns like "whitelisted" or "blacklisted". How can the words fit > for those? Actually, there are two cases like: > > - Foo is blacklisted > - Allow to load the non-whitelisted cards > > Currently I'm replacing the former with "Foo is in denylist", but not > sure about the latter case. I thought Kees mentioned about this, but > don't remember the proposal... Remember these are suggestions for going forwards, not requirements for changing everything. We tend to be a community that likes make work projects because they're easier to do than solving the hard problems, but since we have over 100k occurrences of the various words in the kernel, changing them all would cause massive churn and disrupt forward development, which would cause way more harm than any gain from the change. James _______________________________________________ Ksummit-discuss mailing list Ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss