From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA5EAEF9 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 18:48:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A7BD76D for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 18:48:12 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 20:48:08 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Message-ID: <20190613184808.GA1093@kroah.com> References: <20190612085405.6045d95d@lwn.net> <20190613115712.5024a1b2@coco.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190613115712.5024a1b2@coco.lan> Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] Documentation List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 11:57:12AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > - Things we'd like to improve in the documentation toolchain. > > I remember once I submitted a patch with a script capable of > parsing the files at ABI and produce a parsed content, with the > goal of validating the ABI files against its syntax and to > generate an ABI book. > > IMO, it makes sense to have one book containing the Linux ABI, but, > as the patch didn't have much attention, and I got sidetracked with > something else, I ended giving up on trying to push it. > > Perhaps by KS it would be time to rescue it from some old git tree > and see if it would be worth the time to work on it. I liked that patcheset. If you can dig it up, I can work on reviving it if you don't want to. thanks, greg k-h