From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB6FB18B3 for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 00:12:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33867A9 for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 00:12:34 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 20:12:30 -0400 From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" To: Kees Cook Message-ID: <20190905001230.GB25846@mit.edu> References: <20190826212548.GA15967@mit.edu> <20190828192307.yvf372vnnx7f4iib@wittgenstein> <20190830035117.GB5670@mit.edu> <201908292248.12974C32@keescook> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201908292248.12974C32@keescook> Cc: Christian Brauner , ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] DRAFT Kernel Summit Track schedule List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 10:53:54PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 11:51:17PM -0400, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 09:23:08PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 05:25:48PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > > > This is a draft kernel summit track schedule. Please let me know of > > > > any potential conflicts or schedule changes that you might like to > > > > make. > > > > > > Could we grab a slot for > > > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/ksummit-discuss/2019-July/006699.html > > > please? It doesn't seem to appear in the list yet. > > > > I hadn't scheduled this because it seemed to be a fairly specialized > > topic, and one of the major contributors to the thread (Andy > > Lutomirski) won't be able to be there. Will we have the right people > > to have this discussion in Lisbon? > > I agree it would be better to have Andy there, but I don't think that's > reason enough to not discuss it. We had a rather large BoF meeting at LSS > about it with a circle of maybe 15-20 people where we made some headway > on understanding some of the larger requirements, but there was a lot > left to discuss. I know several people from that discussion will be in > Lisbon, though I agree it's somewhat specialized. I'm not sure what the > "interest level" cut-off is for a ksummit slot, but I know I'll need to > spend time talking with a bunch of people about it in person while I'm > there, so at least having some "unscheduled" slots for similar kinds of > discussions would be value. OK, I've scheduled "Deep Argument Inspection and Seccomp" at 15:45 on Monday. Let me know if that slot doesn't work for anyone critical who needs to participate. - Ted