ksummit.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: ksummit <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] Documentation
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2020 20:05:54 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200613170554.GA14787@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <edbf4ead-6f2d-e548-ee40-517b3ee6ba07@linuxfoundation.org>

Hi Shuah,

On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 10:08:36AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 6/12/20 3:07 AM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 11:28:09AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2020-06-11 at 12:03 -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> >>> People that know the sub-systems well might not
> >>> have time to document and more importantly keeping the documents
> >>> updated.
> >>
> >> So you somehow expect people that do _not_ know the
> >> sub-system well to produce good and useful documentation?
> > 
> > Writing documentation is a way to learn.
> 
> +1
> 
> I find it useful and I also use it as learning tool. When I attempt
> document or explain a concept or an area, I get a deeper understanding
> of that area.

I only partly agree with that. I started the DRM documentation effort
because I had to write a driver, and there was no documentation. Writing
doc was indeed a way to learn, but it's a really high barrier to entry,
more difficult than "just" writing a new driver. You need a very high
level of motivation to do so, I don't think it's a suitable for someone
who has little technical knowledge of the Linux kernel for instance. It
also requires lots of time.

> > Besides, to produce good and usefull documentation it is not necessary
> > to have very deep understanding of all the small details. The writer
> > must capture the large picture and be able to explain it.
> 
> +1.
> 
> I would counter the argument that new developers can't document an area,
> they can and the document can be reviewed by experts.
> 
> A fresh set of eyes bring a new perspective and could help improve the
> code, just like the benefits of having others test your code.

A fresh set of eyes can point to inconsistencies in the code while
writing documentation, but I don't share the view that we can consider
documentation writing as a good learning curve task in general, it
really requires lots of time and a strong incentive in addition to
documentation writing itself.

> I have had some level of success adding documentation tasks in the
> mentoring program. It does require experts spending time reviewing to
> make sure it is correct.

Are those proposed, ongoing or completed tasks ? If some are completed,
could you share information about what has been produced ?

> One thing we could do is creating a list documentation todo and review
> which is part of our development workflow anyway.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart
_______________________________________________
Ksummit-discuss mailing list
Ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-06-13 17:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-09 20:53 [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] Documentation Jonathan Corbet
2020-06-10  8:49 ` Dan Carpenter
2020-06-11  8:21   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-06-11 14:48 ` Linus Walleij
2020-06-11 18:03   ` Shuah Khan
2020-06-11 18:28     ` Joe Perches
2020-06-11 19:44       ` Shuah Khan
2020-06-12  8:18         ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-06-12  9:19           ` Mike Rapoport
2020-06-12 10:58             ` Mark Brown
2020-06-12 15:48           ` Shuah Khan
2020-06-12  9:07       ` Mike Rapoport
2020-06-12 16:08         ` Shuah Khan
2020-06-13 16:42           ` Julia Lawall
2020-06-13 16:51             ` Joe Perches
2020-06-13 17:04               ` Julia Lawall
2020-06-14 13:23               ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-06-14 14:13                 ` Mike Rapoport
2020-06-15  9:46               ` Jani Nikula
2020-06-18  9:04               ` Mike Rapoport
2020-06-18 14:40                 ` Joe Perches
     [not found]                   ` <20200709122118.0ffaea91@coco.lan>
2020-07-09 11:42                     ` Joe Perches
2020-07-09 12:11                       ` Mike Rapoport
2020-07-09 16:59                         ` Joe Perches
2020-07-09 17:29                           ` Mike Rapoport
2020-07-09 17:57                             ` Andrew Lunn
     [not found]                               ` <104986.1594328429@turing-police>
2020-07-10  0:03                                 ` Joe Perches
2020-06-13 17:05           ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2020-06-18  9:08 ` Mike Rapoport
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-06-12 14:54 Jonathan Corbet
2019-06-12 18:22 ` Shuah Khan
2019-06-12 19:12   ` Martin K. Petersen
2019-06-12 19:43     ` Shuah Khan
2019-06-13 14:25   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-06-14 21:40     ` Shuah Khan
2019-06-15  0:05       ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-06-17 10:12         ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-06-17 17:21           ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-06-12 20:33 ` Kate Stewart
2019-06-13 14:17   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-06-13 14:57 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-06-13 18:48   ` Greg KH
2019-06-13 19:01     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-06-20 18:36 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-20 19:28   ` Jonathan Corbet
2019-07-22 14:52 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200613170554.GA14787@pendragon.ideasonboard.com \
    --to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).