From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4729C433DF for ; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 13:31:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from silver.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 710CC2076A for ; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 13:31:07 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 710CC2076A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=denx.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ksummit-discuss-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by silver.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B42022812; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 13:31:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from silver.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u2Nh2+3gae5d; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 13:31:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.linuxfoundation.org (lf-lists.osuosl.org [140.211.9.56]) by silver.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 826BD226F3; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 13:31:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lf-lists.osuosl.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AA43C077B; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 13:31:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fraxinus.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07A4DC016F; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 13:31:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fraxinus.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAA23872EF; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 13:31:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from fraxinus.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X667KxHfy0MO; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 13:31:00 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from jabberwock.ucw.cz (jabberwock.ucw.cz [46.255.230.98]) by fraxinus.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 312C7872C7; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 13:31:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by jabberwock.ucw.cz (Postfix, from userid 1017) id A696E1C0BD2; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 15:30:53 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2020 15:30:52 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Dan Williams Message-ID: <20200711133052.GA6407@amd> References: <159419296487.2464622.863943877093636532.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <159419296487.2464622.863943877093636532.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , SeongJae Park , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tech-board-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Chris Mason , Dave Airlie Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH v2] CodingStyle: Inclusive Terminology X-BeenThere: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7638947921791714715==" Errors-To: ksummit-discuss-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org Sender: "Ksummit-discuss" --===============7638947921791714715== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2" Content-Disposition: inline --UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed 2020-07-08 00:23:59, Dan Williams wrote: > Linux maintains a coding-style and its own idiomatic set of terminology. > Update the style guidelines to recommend replacements for the terms > master/slave and blacklist/whitelist. >=20 > +replacements for 'blacklist/whitelist' are: 'denylist/allowlist' or > +'blocklist/passlist'. I don't see what is "non inclusive" about blacklist and whitelist... Plus, please grep kernel for actual usages. blocklist/denylist is _not_ suitable replacement for kernel use of blacklist. Pavel --=20 (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html --UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAl8JvwwACgkQMOfwapXb+vKaeACdEuEPBbuseLU7rRRWibY5FYQ8 /BEAnRKhc9QvpKTqxo3q27Du59cpsTcJ =siog -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2-- --===============7638947921791714715== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Ksummit-discuss mailing list Ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss --===============7638947921791714715==--