From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F851C433E1 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 04:44:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from silver.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3DE620B80 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 04:44:32 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E3DE620B80 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=joshtriplett.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ksummit-discuss-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by silver.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ECEA2A164; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 04:44:32 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from silver.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UBiH0CtbStyT; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 04:44:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.linuxfoundation.org (lf-lists.osuosl.org [140.211.9.56]) by silver.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A13E8204EA; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 04:44:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lf-lists.osuosl.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 774DEC088E; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 04:44:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fraxinus.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27587C0733; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 04:44:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fraxinus.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D5018878A; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 04:44:29 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from fraxinus.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b1Qj2QTA3Tvo; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 04:44:28 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mslow2.mail.gandi.net (mslow2.mail.gandi.net [217.70.178.242]) by fraxinus.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A0C78877D; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 04:44:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay8-d.mail.gandi.net (unknown [217.70.183.201]) by mslow2.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0B313AFB9E; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 04:40:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Originating-IP: 50.39.163.217 Received: from localhost (50-39-163-217.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net [50.39.163.217]) (Authenticated sender: josh@joshtriplett.org) by relay8-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B67221BF206; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 04:39:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 21:39:49 -0700 From: josh@joshtriplett.org To: Takashi Iwai Message-ID: <20200714043949.GB25423@localhost> References: <159423201991.2466245.8461410729774664077.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , SeongJae Park , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tech-board-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, James Bottomley , Dave Airlie , Christian Brauner , Dan Carpenter Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH v3] CodingStyle: Inclusive Terminology X-BeenThere: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ksummit-discuss-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org Sender: "Ksummit-discuss" On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 10:02:24AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > On Wed, 08 Jul 2020 20:14:27 +0200, > Dan Williams wrote: > > > > +Recommended replacements for 'blacklist/whitelist' are: > > + 'denylist / allowlist' > > + 'blocklist / passlist' > > I started looking through the tree now and noticed there are lots of > patterns like "whitelisted" or "blacklisted". How can the words fit > for those? Actually, there are two cases like: > > - Foo is blacklisted > - Allow to load the non-whitelisted cards > > Currently I'm replacing the former with "Foo is in denylist", but not > sure about the latter case. I thought Kees mentioned about this, but > don't remember the proposal... I find that "blocklist" works well as a verb: "foo is blocklisted", "blocklist foo", or in some cases just "block foo" or "deny foo". For the second case, phrasings like "allow loading non-safelisted cards" or "allow loading cards not on the passlist" seem clear. _______________________________________________ Ksummit-discuss mailing list Ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss