From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-qk1-f173.google.com (mail-qk1-f173.google.com [209.85.222.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA0D32F9B for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:27:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk1-f173.google.com with SMTP id u20so14031337qku.10 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 06:27:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=OqBOY8F6toSunIOUkmGhCgwheSWh8hzJQcqPkl7ZvvI=; b=N98i+nG4QSA4ZbElSMd/73z5rRxlIqY/zRRhKlLzYJ7n71rFLgtuuwNykcLjR5oruJ E/q7kwNkf+YJmn6NVUW5XLg2+Zk3xDN4mj+buztYp3AcfOs9nZ7EhQfnHc+nt5ypCoxS m2qsiLeDyz4/Mn4IYUEq/GWyzlb9SMmsUg2N0= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=OqBOY8F6toSunIOUkmGhCgwheSWh8hzJQcqPkl7ZvvI=; b=qfpya0SsG2iyAGFZOuqai4qs8Lc18R1GTudKnpSvakjXfXLOhpcDz4liXhEqfe5XG3 rAfBl8xBszu4fyn45Biteb83VV+YewoE9jkeylYGun9Y7Xm5JMTpAktM+/PGF873yJSP UHa2ij31tQli9qVuvyl0YxIzEXaT7UfS1bTpJIOGSzxCmXV1amLe7k9PHk/ecwwrXMIN 1z6sVVdQdkxCdB1B8g0PZWdeBelKzzQ2lBENScqhvH/tz6ex4sleBZoj3dsP5Shql1TV x81vH9JOazBeP9qgt/cpYDqmZUMR33DU/d1V/YqMcEyHAkIc7SrQX00I2BGB7+70gs7H MCpA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531DgAvL9cObmTDlZevgDokrJpafilG7UDw2KDiWHvItIWTFzTJG OenrBPzTScERB1slmx4LzeHN7A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw3ePThLFICb67e0sGfdrHzdVwCZWFftN1r+FffvIALCJlIcLc8J+cxIDsNfocyRCZlCKBTdg== X-Received: by 2002:a37:58c5:: with SMTP id m188mr3536005qkb.327.1619098058939; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 06:27:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nitro.local (bras-base-mtrlpq5031w-grc-32-216-209-220-18.dsl.bell.ca. [216.209.220.18]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w196sm2209197qkb.48.2021.04.22.06.27.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 22 Apr 2021 06:27:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 09:27:36 -0400 From: Konstantin Ryabitsev To: Leon Romanovsky Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , James Bottomley , ksummit@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [MAINTAINER SUMMIT] Rethinking the acceptance policy for "trivial" patches Message-ID: <20210422132736.s2lqinm5ke565ujp@nitro.local> References: <20210422112001.22c64fe9@coco.lan> <20210422125357.uuxprp6rqxewcdsr@nitro.local> X-Mailing-List: ksummit@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 04:08:47PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > You'll need to adjust it to point at where your maildir lives, of course, but > > that's the general idea. With it in place, you can hit "4" in the index view > > to get the rest of the thread (without duplicating the messages you already > > have). > > Thanks, I'll try it, however it will fit my flow only partially. > > This macro will bring the missing patches only when I'm near computer (mutt), > while in my flow, I'm reading emails from the phone and only for the replies use > the computer. You may be better served by the upcoming "lei" tool, then. It can identify threads of interest to you (e.g. those on which you are cc'd), put them into your local or remote inbox, and continuously update them as new messages come in. If you run it as a background process, you'll get the workflow you're wanting. -K