ksummit.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] Create 'Posted:' and 'Reviewed:' tags for links in commit messages
@ 2021-12-09  9:52 Thorsten Leemhuis
  2021-12-09  9:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] docs: 5.Posting.rst: describe Fixes: and Link: tags Thorsten Leemhuis
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Thorsten Leemhuis @ 2021-12-09  9:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: workflows, Greg KH, Linus Torvalds
  Cc: ksummit, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Konstantin Ryabitsev,
	Jonathan Corbet

[Preface: sorry, this likely will cause some bikeshedding; but I got the feeling
I should bring this up, as my Regression tracking bot relies on the Link: tag
and thus making its ambiguity worse]

The following patch proposes to create two new tags for stating URLs in commit
messages. They are meant to make it obvious what provided links are about. This
is useful for both users and scripts analyzing commits, as right now they have
no simple way to see what a provided URL is about – they thus have to guess from
the URLs or follow each one to check.

The proposed tag 'Posted:' should point to the last public review posting of the
patch in question, while 'Reported:' is meant to be used for linking to bug
reports. The 'Link:' tag, which until now covered these two aspects, stays
around for other kind of links, for example for links to PDFs or webpages with
background information relevant for the patch.

This submission partly is triggered by regzbot, my Linux kernel regression
tracking bot (https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/regzbot/ ). It
automatically marks a tracked regression as resolved when it notices a commit
with a 'Link:' pointing to the report of the tracked regression; it also uses
this to detect when a proposed fix is posted for review. In preparation for this
I recently improved the kernel's documentation on 'Link:' to the best of my
understanding in commit 1f57bd42b77c ("docs: submitting-patches: make
section about the Link: tag more explicit"). I also started pointing out that
usage to various people when I noticed it was missing. Quite a few developers
didn't know that 'Link:' was supposed to be like this or completely unaware they
were supposed to links bug reports. Developers from the DRM subsystem were using
'References:' instead; some developer also simply used footnotes.

Regzbot doesn't need a 'Reported:' and could continue to work as it does right
now -- with me continuing to educate developers, no big deal. But I wondered if
I was making the "Link: is ambiguous" problem worse. This lead to this
submissions, as I always found it a bit confusing that 'Link:' is used for
different purposes – and hence felt like I should bring this up now, as I then
can sleep well even if this bolt proposal is rejected. :-D

Obviously two new tags will force developers and maintainers to adjust habits
and scripts, so it's nothing that should be done lighthearted. But sticking with
an ambiguous Link: tag for the foreseeable future might not be the best idea
anyway, as we live in times where people analyze commits with scripts for
studies and statistics on reviews and bug reporting.

For 'Posted:' the change hopefully shouldn't be much work for people anyway, as
many just need to update their `git am` hook or switch to a hypothetical new
version of `b4` that was adjusted to place 'Reviewed:' tags instead of 'Link:'.
It's a bit more of a hassle when it comes to 'Reported:', as some people will
need to update their muscle memory. But the similarity to the 'Reported-by:' tag
(to be used in the same situation) should help here; and quite a bit of
education in this area is needed anyway (see above). And 'Link:' stays around,
so there is no harm done if it takes the world a while to adapt.

FWIW, this is already v2, as I sent v1/RFC to workflows list and LKML only to
test the waters and get some feedback. Due to that I chose to switched from the
"Reviewed:" tag I proposed in v1 to the "Posted:" in v2.

Among the feedback I got was also a suggestion from Konstantin, who proposed to
continue with the Link: tag, but add hashtags after the URL to specify what it's
about:

    Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215101   #report
    Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/fobarbaz.5551212@localhost #review

This shouldn't break existing scripts, as that is already allowed -- but it was
hardly used, hence some scripts nevertheless might break. Downsides of this
approach IMHO are: is easy to forget these hashtags when they have to be placed
manually (e.g., in the Reported: case), require people to type more, and make a
line that often is quite long already even longer. But FWIW, it's totally fine
for me if it's decided to go down that route, then I'll adjust the patch
accordingly.

There were also a few suggestions to use tags closer to what users of Git forges
are used to, but I didn't see anything that would be a good fit. If you know
something (instead of "Posted:" maybe "MergeRequest:"?), let me know.

Furthermore, the question came up if we still need the "Reported:" tag if we
link to the report, as the information is available from the link. I left it, as
show gratitude to the reporter, which motivates people.

FWIW, If this bold proposal gets rejected, I'll simply submit the first patch of
this series to improve the documentation of the status quo.

Ciao, Thorsten

---
v2/RFC: (this version)
- split the non-controversial parts out into a preparatory patch
- s/Reviewed:/Posted:/
- a few minor changes due to review feedback from various people
- mention some of the feedback from v1 in the cover letter

v1/RFC: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1637566224.git.linux@leemhuis.info/
- first, *rough version* to see how this idea is received in the
  community

Thorsten Leemhuis (2):
  docs: 5.Posting.rst: describe Fixes: and Link: tags
  docs: introduce the commit message tags 'Reported:' and 'Posted:'

 Documentation/maintainer/configure-git.rst   |  8 ++---
 Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst          | 37 ++++++++++++++++----
 Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst | 22 ++++++------
 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)


base-commit: 065db2d90c6b8384c9072fe55f01c3eeda16c3c0
-- 
2.31.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] docs: 5.Posting.rst: describe Fixes: and Link: tags
  2021-12-09  9:52 [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] Create 'Posted:' and 'Reviewed:' tags for links in commit messages Thorsten Leemhuis
@ 2021-12-09  9:52 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
  2021-12-09  9:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] docs: introduce the commit message tags 'Reported:' and 'Posted:' Thorsten Leemhuis
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Thorsten Leemhuis @ 2021-12-09  9:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: workflows, Greg KH, Linus Torvalds
  Cc: ksummit, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Konstantin Ryabitsev,
	Jonathan Corbet

Explain Fixes: and Link: tags in Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst,
which for unknown reasons were not described yet in this file.

Signed-off-by: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@leemhuis.info>
---
v2/RFC:
- first version, split off from another patch to make this a preparatory
  patch that can be applied even if the other patch is not
---
 Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst b/Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst
index 855a70b80269..46635310c7c5 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst
@@ -197,14 +197,29 @@ the build process, for example, or editor backup files) in the patch.  The
 file "dontdiff" in the Documentation directory can help in this regard;
 pass it to diff with the "-X" option.
 
-The tags mentioned above are used to describe how various developers have
-been associated with the development of this patch.  They are described in
-detail in
-the :ref:`Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst <submittingpatches>`
-document; what follows here is a brief summary.  Each of these lines has
-the format:
+The tags already briefly mentioned above are used to provide insights how
+the patch came into being. They are described in detail in the
+:ref:`Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst <submittingpatches>`
+document; what follows here is a brief summary.
 
-::
+One tag is used to refer to earlier commits which had problems fixed by
+the patch::
+
+	Fixes: 1f2e3d4c5b6a ("The first line of the commit specified by the first 12 characters of its SHA-1 ID")
+
+Another tag is used for linking web pages with additional backgrounds or
+details, for example a report about a bug fixed by the patch or a document
+with a specification implemented by the patch::
+
+	Link: https://example.com/somewhere.html  optional-other-stuff
+
+Many maintainers when applying a patch also add this tag to link to the
+latest public review posting of the patch; often this is automatically done
+by tools like b4 or a git hook like the one described in
+'Documentation/maintainer/configure-git.rst'.
+
+A third kind of tags are used to document which developers were involved in
+the development of the patch. Each of these uses this format::
 
 	tag: Full Name <email address>  optional-other-stuff
 
-- 
2.31.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] docs: introduce the commit message tags 'Reported:' and 'Posted:'
  2021-12-09  9:52 [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] Create 'Posted:' and 'Reviewed:' tags for links in commit messages Thorsten Leemhuis
  2021-12-09  9:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] docs: 5.Posting.rst: describe Fixes: and Link: tags Thorsten Leemhuis
@ 2021-12-09  9:52 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
  2021-12-09 11:26 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] Create 'Posted:' and 'Reported:' tags for links in commit messages Thorsten Leemhuis
  2021-12-10 12:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] Create 'Posted:' and 'Reviewed:' " Dan Carpenter
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Thorsten Leemhuis @ 2021-12-09  9:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: workflows, Greg KH, Linus Torvalds
  Cc: ksummit, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Konstantin Ryabitsev,
	Jonathan Corbet

Add the tags 'Posted:' and 'Reported:'. They supplement 'Link:', which
historically is used to point to different things without indicating at
all what the provided URL is about. Users and scripts analyzing commits
thus have to guess from the URLs or follow each one to find out, which
might be hard for a script.

Documenting these tag also provides clarity for developers, as some
didn't link to bug reports at all. Some developers did, but used
'References:' for this. Nevertheless 'Reported:' was chosen for this
purpose, as it better matches up with the 'Reported-by:' tag commonly
used and already needed in this situation anyway.

Signed-off-by: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@leemhuis.info>
To: workflows@vger.kernel.org
---
Note: during review of v1 it was pointed out the perl regex modified in
'configure-git.rst' need to be case-insensitive; I will propose this
with a patch submitted separately once the best approach for that
problem was finally agreed on.

---
 Documentation/maintainer/configure-git.rst   |  8 +++----
 Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst          | 24 +++++++++++++-------
 Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst | 22 ++++++++++--------
 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/maintainer/configure-git.rst b/Documentation/maintainer/configure-git.rst
index 80ae5030a590..e33e4121cf21 100644
--- a/Documentation/maintainer/configure-git.rst
+++ b/Documentation/maintainer/configure-git.rst
@@ -40,12 +40,12 @@ Creating commit links to lore.kernel.org
 The web site http://lore.kernel.org is meant as a grand archive of all mail
 list traffic concerning or influencing the kernel development. Storing archives
 of patches here is a recommended practice, and when a maintainer applies a
-patch to a subsystem tree, it is a good idea to provide a Link: tag with a
+patch to a subsystem tree, it is a good idea to provide a Posted: tag with a
 reference back to the lore archive so that people that browse the commit
 history can find related discussions and rationale behind a certain change.
-The link tag will look like this:
+The tag will look like this:
 
-    Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/<message-id>
+    Posted: https://lore.kernel.org/r/<message-id>
 
 This can be configured to happen automatically any time you issue ``git am``
 by adding the following hook into your git:
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ by adding the following hook into your git:
 	$ cat >.git/hooks/applypatch-msg <<'EOF'
 	#!/bin/sh
 	. git-sh-setup
-	perl -pi -e 's|^Message-Id:\s*<?([^>]+)>?$|Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/$1|g;' "$1"
+	perl -pi -e 's|^Message-Id:\s*<?([^>]+)>?$|Posted: https://lore.kernel.org/r/$1|g;' "$1"
 	test -x "$GIT_DIR/hooks/commit-msg" &&
 		exec "$GIT_DIR/hooks/commit-msg" ${1+"$@"}
 	:
diff --git a/Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst b/Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst
index 46635310c7c5..1aa4167d54ea 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst
@@ -207,16 +207,24 @@ the patch::
 
 	Fixes: 1f2e3d4c5b6a ("The first line of the commit specified by the first 12 characters of its SHA-1 ID")
 
-Another tag is used for linking web pages with additional backgrounds or
-details, for example a report about a bug fixed by the patch or a document
-with a specification implemented by the patch::
+A second kind of tags is used for linking web pages with additional details.
+There are three different tags of this sort which all use the following
+format::
 
-	Link: https://example.com/somewhere.html  optional-other-stuff
+	tag: <url>  optional-other-stuff
 
-Many maintainers when applying a patch also add this tag to link to the
-latest public review posting of the patch; often this is automatically done
-by tools like b4 or a git hook like the one described in
-'Documentation/maintainer/configure-git.rst'.
+The tags in common use are:
+
+ - ``Reported:`` points to a report of a problem fixed by this patch. The
+   provided URL thus might point to a entry in a bug tracker or a mail in a
+   mailing list archive. Typically this tag is followed by a "Reported-by:"
+   tag (see below).
+
+ - ``Link:`` points to websites providing additional backgrounds or details,
+   for example an earlier discussion that let to the development of the patch.
+
+ - ``Posted:`` this is a tag many maintainers add when applying a patch, to
+   make the commit point to the latest public review posting of the patch.
 
 A third kind of tags are used to document which developers were involved in
 the development of the patch. Each of these uses this format::
diff --git a/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst b/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
index 6b3aaed66fba..658581be5fa0 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
@@ -113,20 +113,22 @@ collisions with shorter IDs a real possibility.  Bear in mind that, even if
 there is no collision with your six-character ID now, that condition may
 change five years from now.
 
-If related discussions or any other background information behind the change
-can be found on the web, add 'Link:' tags pointing to it. In case your patch
-fixes a bug, for example, add a tag with a URL referencing the report in the
-mailing list archives or a bug tracker; if the patch is a result of some
-earlier mailing list discussion or something documented on the web, point to
-it.
+Add tags linking to any related discussions or background information behind
+the change on the web. For example, if your patch fixes a bug, add a
+`Reported:` tag pointing to the report in the mailing list archives or a bug
+tracker::
 
-When linking to mailing list archives, preferably use the lore.kernel.org
-message archiver service. To create the link URL, use the contents of the
-``Message-Id`` header of the message without the surrounding angle brackets.
-For example::
+    Reported: https://lore.kernel.org/r/30th.anniversary.repost@klaava.Helsinki.FI/
+
+If the patch is a related to some earlier mailing list discussion or something
+documented on the web, point to it using a `Link:` tag::
 
     Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/30th.anniversary.repost@klaava.Helsinki.FI/
 
+When linking to mailing list archives, preferably use the lore.kernel.org
+message archiver service. To create the link URL, use the contents of the
+``Message-Id`` header of the message without the surrounding angle brackets,
+e.g. "30th.anniversary.repost@klaava.Helsinki.FI" in the two examples above.
 Please check the link to make sure that it is actually working and points
 to the relevant message.
 
-- 
2.31.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] Create 'Posted:' and 'Reported:' tags for links in commit messages
  2021-12-09  9:52 [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] Create 'Posted:' and 'Reviewed:' tags for links in commit messages Thorsten Leemhuis
  2021-12-09  9:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] docs: 5.Posting.rst: describe Fixes: and Link: tags Thorsten Leemhuis
  2021-12-09  9:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] docs: introduce the commit message tags 'Reported:' and 'Posted:' Thorsten Leemhuis
@ 2021-12-09 11:26 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
  2021-12-10 12:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] Create 'Posted:' and 'Reviewed:' " Dan Carpenter
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Thorsten Leemhuis @ 2021-12-09 11:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: workflows, Greg KH, Linus Torvalds
  Cc: ksummit, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Konstantin Ryabitsev,
	Jonathan Corbet

/me grumbles

Stupid me mixed up the the subject when editing, which should read
'Posted:' and 'Reported:', as can be seen from the body of the cover
letter and the subject of v2. Sorry.

/me wanders off to find a place to hide in shame

On 09.12.21 10:52, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> [Preface: sorry, this likely will cause some bikeshedding; but I got the feeling
> I should bring this up, as my Regression tracking bot relies on the Link: tag
> and thus making its ambiguity worse]
> 
> The following patch proposes to create two new tags for stating URLs in commit
> messages. They are meant to make it obvious what provided links are about. This
> is useful for both users and scripts analyzing commits, as right now they have
> no simple way to see what a provided URL is about – they thus have to guess from
> the URLs or follow each one to check.
> 
> The proposed tag 'Posted:' should point to the last public review posting of the
> patch in question, while 'Reported:' is meant to be used for linking to bug
> reports. The 'Link:' tag, which until now covered these two aspects, stays
> around for other kind of links, for example for links to PDFs or webpages with
> background information relevant for the patch.
> 
> This submission partly is triggered by regzbot, my Linux kernel regression
> tracking bot (https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/regzbot/ ). It
> automatically marks a tracked regression as resolved when it notices a commit
> with a 'Link:' pointing to the report of the tracked regression; it also uses
> this to detect when a proposed fix is posted for review. In preparation for this
> I recently improved the kernel's documentation on 'Link:' to the best of my
> understanding in commit 1f57bd42b77c ("docs: submitting-patches: make
> section about the Link: tag more explicit"). I also started pointing out that
> usage to various people when I noticed it was missing. Quite a few developers
> didn't know that 'Link:' was supposed to be like this or completely unaware they
> were supposed to links bug reports. Developers from the DRM subsystem were using
> 'References:' instead; some developer also simply used footnotes.
> 
> Regzbot doesn't need a 'Reported:' and could continue to work as it does right
> now -- with me continuing to educate developers, no big deal. But I wondered if
> I was making the "Link: is ambiguous" problem worse. This lead to this
> submissions, as I always found it a bit confusing that 'Link:' is used for
> different purposes – and hence felt like I should bring this up now, as I then
> can sleep well even if this bolt proposal is rejected. :-D
> 
> Obviously two new tags will force developers and maintainers to adjust habits
> and scripts, so it's nothing that should be done lighthearted. But sticking with
> an ambiguous Link: tag for the foreseeable future might not be the best idea
> anyway, as we live in times where people analyze commits with scripts for
> studies and statistics on reviews and bug reporting.
> 
> For 'Posted:' the change hopefully shouldn't be much work for people anyway, as
> many just need to update their `git am` hook or switch to a hypothetical new
> version of `b4` that was adjusted to place 'Reviewed:' tags instead of 'Link:'.
> It's a bit more of a hassle when it comes to 'Reported:', as some people will
> need to update their muscle memory. But the similarity to the 'Reported-by:' tag
> (to be used in the same situation) should help here; and quite a bit of
> education in this area is needed anyway (see above). And 'Link:' stays around,
> so there is no harm done if it takes the world a while to adapt.
> 
> FWIW, this is already v2, as I sent v1/RFC to workflows list and LKML only to
> test the waters and get some feedback. Due to that I chose to switched from the
> "Reviewed:" tag I proposed in v1 to the "Posted:" in v2.
> 
> Among the feedback I got was also a suggestion from Konstantin, who proposed to
> continue with the Link: tag, but add hashtags after the URL to specify what it's
> about:
> 
>     Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215101   #report
>     Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/fobarbaz.5551212@localhost #review
> 
> This shouldn't break existing scripts, as that is already allowed -- but it was
> hardly used, hence some scripts nevertheless might break. Downsides of this
> approach IMHO are: is easy to forget these hashtags when they have to be placed
> manually (e.g., in the Reported: case), require people to type more, and make a
> line that often is quite long already even longer. But FWIW, it's totally fine
> for me if it's decided to go down that route, then I'll adjust the patch
> accordingly.
> 
> There were also a few suggestions to use tags closer to what users of Git forges
> are used to, but I didn't see anything that would be a good fit. If you know
> something (instead of "Posted:" maybe "MergeRequest:"?), let me know.
> 
> Furthermore, the question came up if we still need the "Reported:" tag if we
> link to the report, as the information is available from the link. I left it, as
> show gratitude to the reporter, which motivates people.
> 
> FWIW, If this bold proposal gets rejected, I'll simply submit the first patch of
> this series to improve the documentation of the status quo.
> 
> Ciao, Thorsten
> 
> ---
> v2/RFC: (this version)
> - split the non-controversial parts out into a preparatory patch
> - s/Reviewed:/Posted:/
> - a few minor changes due to review feedback from various people
> - mention some of the feedback from v1 in the cover letter
> 
> v1/RFC: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1637566224.git.linux@leemhuis.info/
> - first, *rough version* to see how this idea is received in the
>   community
> 
> Thorsten Leemhuis (2):
>   docs: 5.Posting.rst: describe Fixes: and Link: tags
>   docs: introduce the commit message tags 'Reported:' and 'Posted:'
> 
>  Documentation/maintainer/configure-git.rst   |  8 ++---
>  Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst          | 37 ++++++++++++++++----
>  Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst | 22 ++++++------
>  3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> base-commit: 065db2d90c6b8384c9072fe55f01c3eeda16c3c0
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] Create 'Posted:' and 'Reviewed:' tags for links in commit messages
  2021-12-09  9:52 [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] Create 'Posted:' and 'Reviewed:' tags for links in commit messages Thorsten Leemhuis
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-12-09 11:26 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] Create 'Posted:' and 'Reported:' tags for links in commit messages Thorsten Leemhuis
@ 2021-12-10 12:35 ` Dan Carpenter
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2021-12-10 12:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thorsten Leemhuis
  Cc: workflows, Greg KH, Linus Torvalds, ksummit,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, Konstantin Ryabitsev, Jonathan Corbet

Yeah.  Now that we're all using b4 then having a message-id is nice.

Perhaps this is something which could be added to patchwork so that it
can be added automatically.

regards,
dan carpenter


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-12-10 12:35 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-12-09  9:52 [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] Create 'Posted:' and 'Reviewed:' tags for links in commit messages Thorsten Leemhuis
2021-12-09  9:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] docs: 5.Posting.rst: describe Fixes: and Link: tags Thorsten Leemhuis
2021-12-09  9:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] docs: introduce the commit message tags 'Reported:' and 'Posted:' Thorsten Leemhuis
2021-12-09 11:26 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] Create 'Posted:' and 'Reported:' tags for links in commit messages Thorsten Leemhuis
2021-12-10 12:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] Create 'Posted:' and 'Reviewed:' " Dan Carpenter

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).