From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
ksummit@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [MAINTAINER SUMMIT] User-space requirements for accelerator drivers
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2021 09:43:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <680a7c9767eb0ddf8035bc90ba1d144fe1f7b4cd.camel@HansenPartnership.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YT4i4cN4ScWY8Ikf@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
On Sun, 2021-09-12 at 18:55 +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> As mentioned in another part of the mail thread, requiring code being
> merged in upstream userspace projects and/or packaged by
> distributions will cause deadlocks, but requiring code to be
> submitted and (pre-)approved is workable. That's what DRM/KMS does.
> To upstream a new KMS property for instance, you need to show how
> it's going to be used in Weston/Xorg/Android/... by submitting
> patches, and have the overall architecture approved by the
> corresponding maintainers.
This is no different from interlocks required in pretty much every
other project crossing open source feature, so it seems like the right
approach to me. We already use this for confidential computing, which
often requires interlocking changes to QEMU, edk2 and other tools.
Usually, for confidential computing, the evaluation is on either the
QEMU or edk2 list which then accepts the patch and the rest of the
projects follow. We do, occasionally, get a late objection to the API
from one of the other projects after part of the enabling code has gone
upstream in the others, but we handle this like a bug fix.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-12 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-10 21:00 [MAINTAINER SUMMIT] User-space requirements for accelerator drivers Jonathan Corbet
2021-09-10 21:32 ` Josh Triplett
2021-09-13 13:50 ` Christian Brauner
2021-09-13 13:57 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-09-14 2:07 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-09-14 14:40 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-14 14:45 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-09-14 14:59 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-14 15:10 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-09-10 21:51 ` James Bottomley
2021-09-10 21:59 ` Alexandre Belloni
2021-09-10 22:35 ` James Bottomley
2021-09-11 14:51 ` Jonathan Corbet
2021-09-11 15:24 ` James Bottomley
2021-09-11 21:52 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-09-14 13:22 ` Johannes Berg
2021-09-11 0:08 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-09-10 22:52 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-09-10 23:45 ` Josh Triplett
2021-09-10 23:48 ` Dave Hansen
2021-09-11 0:13 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-09-10 23:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-09-11 0:20 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-09-11 14:20 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-09-11 22:08 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-09-11 22:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-09-11 23:10 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-09-13 11:10 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-11 22:51 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-09-11 23:22 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-09-11 10:31 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-09-11 11:41 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-09-11 12:04 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-09-11 22:04 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-09-12 4:27 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-09-12 7:26 ` Greg KH
2021-09-12 8:29 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-09-12 13:25 ` Greg KH
2021-09-12 14:15 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-09-12 14:34 ` Greg KH
2021-09-12 16:41 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-09-12 20:35 ` Dave Airlie
2021-09-12 20:41 ` Dave Airlie
2021-09-12 20:49 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-09-12 21:12 ` Dave Airlie
2021-09-12 22:51 ` Linus Walleij
2021-09-12 23:15 ` Dave Airlie
2021-09-13 13:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-09-13 13:54 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-09-13 22:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-09-13 23:33 ` Dave Airlie
2021-09-14 9:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-09-14 9:23 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-09-14 10:47 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-09-14 12:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-09-14 19:45 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-09-14 15:43 ` Luck, Tony
2021-09-13 14:52 ` James Bottomley
2021-09-14 13:07 ` Linus Walleij
2021-09-13 14:03 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-12 15:55 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-09-12 16:43 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2021-09-12 16:58 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-09-12 17:08 ` James Bottomley
2021-09-12 19:52 ` Dave Airlie
2021-09-12 7:46 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-09-12 8:00 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-09-12 14:53 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-09-12 15:41 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-09-10 23:46 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-09-11 0:38 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-09-11 9:27 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-09-11 22:33 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-09-13 12:04 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-12 19:13 ` Dave Airlie
2021-09-12 19:48 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-09-13 2:26 ` Dave Airlie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=680a7c9767eb0ddf8035bc90ba1d144fe1f7b4cd.camel@HansenPartnership.com \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=ksummit@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).