From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24D2F3C26 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 14:01:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:281:8300:73::5f6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 98106735; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 14:01:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 98106735 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1663855280; bh=0X2VOXS7AEoKvoeXcivKYDt8IliGdOXuZc3Dgz7NRxE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=Tfnhrpq7aQEk0fJVAAYA0fcLSmyMAls1dfW2SZnTfvCiqHzEx71kZfbMsO+mJt8mU f39plQiLRWGBv6G+LwizVj5RPzhXGRqZSE9omqlfVtcjywwSS2DSoatPj/aG/kPkhW FKEPcdnVSY3DC1Fjr5HqLRWSgO0pQq0DfR0/dA/wNLwfqKkHkljAv/vxhUdfmUlDzk gLfSiXZLyo8KV5yHG+oHaT25ZbtmcbOptuVxFqSndSkifBEKYT3tWkIS7l3PzFi2bk XXX4Y1OS/bPK5tsN746jBzKpuqfvXJ2fsutbXbm1CQScNd9fJbCTKpH/FWzi1nUnMu naVDHKAyfus7g== From: Jonathan Corbet To: Vlastimil Babka , Chris Mason , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ksummit@lists.linux.dev Cc: tech-board@lists.linuxfoundation.org, tab-elections@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Tab-elections] Results from the 2022 LF TAB election In-Reply-To: <70136115-5e77-c00a-9c29-b06cb8fcef0d@suse.cz> References: <87h71984jy.fsf@meer.lwn.net> <9755284e-6b57-8340-dbf5-1bb50f036da3@fb.com> <70136115-5e77-c00a-9c29-b06cb8fcef0d@suse.cz> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 08:01:19 -0600 Message-ID: <87leqbse34.fsf@meer.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: ksummit@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Vlastimil Babka writes: > I was wondering, as the voting is fully online now, does it have to > still overlap LPC exactly? For example I happened to miss the most > important e-mail from CIVS in my inbox during the conference, and while > I tried to login there by the activation code, I could only see there I > was invited to 2021 poll but didn't see the 2022 one (nor I can see it > there now; I assume the link from the CIVS mail would have worked, but > too late now). > > Also, since it seems many of the nominations were last-minute [1] I only > saw two of them by Friday. So even if I didn't miss the CIVS e-mail, I > would have to read through the manifestos and rank the candidates > quickly during LPC, which wouldn't have been ideal. > > So maybe the vote could be scheduler for the week before LPC? And then > both the new and old TAB members that happen to travel there could meet > there knowing the results already. The current charter for the TAB ties the voting to the kernel summit; in the move online we interpreted that as running during LPC, where what remains of the kernel summit is held. I don't think it has to be that way; it might be better to pick a time of the year when things are relatively calm and just always do the election then. It would require a charter change, but that should be doable. Thanks, jon