From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C585AC433E0 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 11:15:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fraxinus.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 955E92073E for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 11:15:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="Uyc7LAqj" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 955E92073E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ksummit-discuss-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fraxinus.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50379874C1; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 11:15:47 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from fraxinus.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z3RwZ5W4-OYn; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 11:15:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.linuxfoundation.org (lf-lists.osuosl.org [140.211.9.56]) by fraxinus.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1440987432; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 11:15:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lf-lists.osuosl.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8B95C0893; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 11:15:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from silver.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0389C016F; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 11:15:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by silver.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D700522225; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 11:15:44 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from silver.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id in4UCxrPA26y; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 11:15:44 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-ej1-f67.google.com (mail-ej1-f67.google.com [209.85.218.67]) by silver.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCCB721FA8; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 11:15:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ej1-f67.google.com with SMTP id a1so41902786ejg.12; Mon, 06 Jul 2020 04:15:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=cc:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OyfaboQiLD7e60Rt0fpF2g5A7vePJGkRXKorLr5zFEw=; b=Uyc7LAqj/fGeUowhfHf3Zh7ykH1nK9ZzLsVFlmMsOwTy/b7WhE2yLMKtIg+UsXdWmw Lk5Y/x9fp9gIUmQDoy083MUEGZv0+84b2V44Qe654U9g7apPddmh5xaB+NkiZ6CMD3lw RhRZl1KzDxC/vALP2lMU6+JEC/550g02B0HlfZ/yaDkYWn5itmd3KPlZ32oTQuOthgsg nDBoKlhR1ek526WlxY6Z+UgUnxD4PVTTJUEwmonngmXV0eeUWWU9HEVs6qKkts3Se8FG 2I4mUQP93DlWLwoMIHjaZjXObLaCR4cgMdN9zTh/QTM/zXS/e/7QDDQu35b0T4sDJNK6 yEGA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:cc:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=OyfaboQiLD7e60Rt0fpF2g5A7vePJGkRXKorLr5zFEw=; b=MsTTw3VuBtdqY3+tADBHpJ4V932bb9RTV/O1HrTMmKdYcMxjdQ+/XRvBbkFisZYLqI RbZXSfXsFklIXs1B/lPl/F7Dzkyy/+KrWzDMMJpEQ+KF14Q9PIjCvESMEE5jd82o6dYV opoOJ7JPhvGNrm0ZJ1fwOXTInqki1elrlq8LdPoUtCle8mc45coUl8VjNFGYkoPalZgm ZGuH35ssmg14GWrknw5ajmm2jCUi9mdBWNDCjdUfu9UsLkLoIb2hMt/5bFu8MOgfgfeI BQ4iciKrFU7TCqs1UtAydofvfpSjNvDT3lUnOPWPdusUytcppIp/riaDUDqFjnXOi3m/ 54+Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5304vsbQGCDxHOVuwgFrSkKGITr4z1w2FO0pt+CX5pMRk14NXJjt fztALe3gJVdgt6Q+p+xZCZM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw94tFJtTSl2W6ES4QpwV4udsVsb5UYSoR/ZLQz/kL9wfqqXK1RfjTuif6Y6mo+rSyLBe2w8A== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:958f:: with SMTP id r15mr31228363ejx.77.1594034142283; Mon, 06 Jul 2020 04:15:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:a61:3adb:8201:9649:88f:51f8:6a21? ([2001:a61:3adb:8201:9649:88f:51f8:6a21]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s1sm23168755edy.1.2020.07.06.04.15.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 06 Jul 2020 04:15:41 -0700 (PDT) To: Kees Cook , Matthew Wilcox References: <159389297140.2210796.13590142254668787525.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <920e6dc0-628b-9bad-926a-d1238a373cda@infradead.org> <202007041804.B5E229E2B6@keescook> From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" Message-ID: <8c0c1050-3beb-86f6-f184-4687acffd61d@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2020 13:15:38 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <202007041804.B5E229E2B6@keescook> Content-Language: en-US Cc: ksummit , Greg Kroah-Hartman , LKML , tech-board-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, expensivestephen@hotmail.com, Chris Mason Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [Tech-board-discuss] [PATCH] CodingStyle: Inclusive Terminology X-BeenThere: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ksummit-discuss-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org Sender: "Ksummit-discuss" On 7/5/20 3:10 AM, Kees Cook wrote: > On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 08:10:33PM -0400, Matthew Wilcox wrote: >> Left-right tree makes no sense. It doesn't distinguish the rbtree from its >> predecessor the avl tree. I don't think it's helpful to rename a standard >> piece of computing terminology unless it's actually hurting us to have it. >> Obviously if it were called a "master-slave" tree, I would be in favour of >> renaming it. > > (No one has suggested renaming red/black trees, so I think the > slippery-slope argument can be set aside here.) > > As for the actual proposal on white/black-list, I've always been annoyed > by the poor description it provides (and I get to see it A LOT being > the seccomp maintainer). I welcome allow/deny-list (though the change is > not new for seccomp -- the man pages were updated last year (thanks > mkerrisk). :) Actually, the manual pages are ahead of the game only thanks to a nice presentation last year @OSS from Stephen Kenigbolo :-). -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/ _______________________________________________ Ksummit-discuss mailing list Ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss