From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77458F6A for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 19:31:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qt1-f194.google.com (mail-qt1-f194.google.com [209.85.160.194]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FB2A89E for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 19:31:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qt1-f194.google.com with SMTP id j15so12232407qtl.13 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 12:31:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190823013619.GA8130@mit.edu> <20190823151843.GH8130@mit.edu> <20190823161947.GA112509@dtor-ws> In-Reply-To: From: Joel Fernandes Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 15:31:43 -0400 Message-ID: To: Thomas Gleixner Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: Barret Rhoden , ksummit , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jonathan Nieder , Tomasz Figa , Han-Wen Nienhuys , Theodore Tso , David Rientjes , Dmitry Torokhov , Dmitry Vyukov Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Allowing something Change-Id (or something like it) in kernel commits List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 3:23 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Fri, 23 Aug 2019, Joel Fernandes via Ksummit-discuss wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 3:08 PM Joel Fernandes wrote: > > > Another thing that could be done is, have the git hook insert the > > > > And, here I meant have git-send-email or the patch sending program > > insert the unique ID into the discardable part. > > > > In my flow, I have scripts that remove metadata from my commit message > > and insert them into the discardable part of the patch already which I > > use for "additional notes". I am not sure what it would take to have > > people use such scripts... > > Well, if some organization wants those IDs or whatever then they will come > up with proper tooling which enforces this. We won't ever be able to > enforce it on every submitter on the planet. Agreed. > For maintainers we can make the Message-ID link mandatory if the community > agrees on it. git has some form of support for that already as I learned in > some other thread. And adding it to homebrewn tooling is not rocket science > either. Yep. I am curious now what support exists in git for this. I'll try to look for that up, thanks! - Joel