From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A60EE7C for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 18:14:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi1-f193.google.com (mail-oi1-f193.google.com [209.85.167.193]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D491756 for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 18:14:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi1-f193.google.com with SMTP id w6so1004319oie.11 for ; Tue, 03 Sep 2019 11:14:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190830031720.GA7490@mit.edu> <20190830135857.GF7013@google.com> <20190902222240.GE3367@mit.edu> <574c0ccd-730a-eada-966c-58f5de7c9477@redhat.com> <20190903172708.qrvaad2paze6ifhz@chatter.i7.local> In-Reply-To: <20190903172708.qrvaad2paze6ifhz@chatter.i7.local> From: Dan Williams Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 11:14:46 -0700 Message-ID: To: Linus Torvalds , Laura Abbott , Bjorn Helgaas , "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Topics for the Maintainer's Summit List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 10:27 AM Konstantin Ryabitsev [..] > So: > > - would a tool with such functionality be useful, or would every > maintainer prefer to continue doing their own thing (in slightly > different ways)? Yes, I would consider switching to this. The kernel.org patchwork-bot + the getpatchwork tool [1] does some of this for me, but lossless patch reception, sharing rules and triggers for patches (not just git-hooks) is a powerful superset. [1]: https://github.com/getpatchwork/git-pw