From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4B9471 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 17:12:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 91F78613CD; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 17:12:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1619197956; bh=8HiRXDxXgksb2yUy1Np0F30r2P7/xU3tUPuFzosQXYM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=lu8PVLHKqWBfEjIpf4VI9L4nPYzvp0GKW9dqal+HUkBat/L5zI2ZtZrI5xgzIn6VO NZzXSf8cRCIQJ+m6je8K1Wd1rFBo6j4phsW/47GeaxNLHyMEXuSFzTMD/UxeuwLASR qGUZxRTj8yjRKZ2NACVkPoNa5Uo6JFSUWHvOcrKrfwBLNmvI491g2TGVzu2EC/Ox1f Nx/8oXhJOforibtcpG0kvr5wifdk0W0T+E8rL3N2WSZdisEW9sUfhq6fTnD/dy3AW4 81MPbZsYw8xQJpePnjO1dX4/gPpBmMc/SYTm0ZoazQlL9qiJp9Sm128lrgVGgJQN3G rih+1ytiUS2Rg== Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 20:12:32 +0300 From: Leon Romanovsky To: Mark Brown Cc: Doug Anderson , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Joe Perches , Rob Herring , Steven Rostedt , James Bottomley , ksummit@lists.linux.dev, tools@linux.kernel.org, Simon Glass Subject: Re: Better tools for sending patches (was: Re: [MAINTAINER SUMMIT] Rethinking the acceptance policy for "trivial" patches) Message-ID: References: <20210422112001.22c64fe9@coco.lan> <20210422092916.556e5e50@gandalf.local.home> <20210423080454.78f4f662@coco.lan> <6c221d801c5a6834168207b5ccadc76ac432c766.camel@perches.com> <20210423091320.4f2381b2@coco.lan> <20210423160310.GD5507@sirena.org.uk> X-Mailing-List: ksummit@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <20210423160310.GD5507@sirena.org.uk> On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 05:03:10PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 07:52:30AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: >=20 > > I know it's nearly impossible to get people to change their workflows, > > but if you're open to it I definitely suggest giving it a try. Simon > > Glass (the original author) is also quite receptive to improvements. >=20 > I have something broadly similar (much more simplistic and overall less > capable) which I wrote myself - the things I have that this doesn't have > are: >=20 > - Attesting the outgoing patches with b4. > - Tagging the published series in git. I have something similar too, which actually wrapper over git format-patch that properly set target (net-next, rdma-next, iproute2, rdma-core, mlx5-ne= xt e.t.c) and changes "To;" based on target. Thanks