From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09C81C49ED7 for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 11:27:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org (mail.linuxfoundation.org [140.211.169.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCF5D205F4 for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 11:27:05 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CCF5D205F4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=perches.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ksummit-discuss-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org Received: from mail.linux-foundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 390B7AE0; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 11:27:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp2.linuxfoundation.org (smtp2.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.36]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8C65AD1 for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 11:27:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: delayed 03:29:59 by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from smtprelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0013.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.13]) by smtp2.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 292B41DDD9 for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 11:27:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtprelay.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by smtpgrave07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FEFA18036D64 for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 05:30:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (clb03-v110.bra.tucows.net [216.40.38.60]) by smtprelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C534080422AC; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 05:30:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-HE-Tag: honey36_3b89e0c6eb21c X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 3226 Received: from [10.10.16.41] (unknown [113.161.206.70]) (Authenticated sender: joe@perches.com) by omf09.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 05:30:08 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: From: Joe Perches To: Dan Carpenter , Mauro Carvalho Chehab Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 22:29:33 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20190919070856.GG2959@kadam> References: <156821693963.2951081.11214256396118531359.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <434c05bddd2b364e607e565227487910a8dd9793.1568391461.git.mchehab+samsung@kernel.org> <20190918123620.GA6306@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> <20190918105728.24e7eb48@coco.lan> <20190918172705.GC4734@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> <20190918154831.3dd0d040@coco.lan> <20190919070856.GG2959@kadam> User-Agent: Evolution 3.32.1-2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Linux Media Mailing List Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH] media: add a subsystem profile documentation X-BeenThere: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: ksummit-discuss-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org Errors-To: ksummit-discuss-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Thu, 2019-09-19 at 10:08 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 03:48:31PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > Em Wed, 18 Sep 2019 20:27:05 +0300 > > Laurent Pinchart escreveu: > > > > > > Anyway, not sure if the other sub-maintainers see the same way. From my side, > > > > I prefer not to be c/c, as this is just more noise, as I just rely on > > > > patchwork for media patches. What about changing this to: > > > > > > > > Patches for the media subsystem should be sent to the media mailing list > > > > at linux-media@vger.kernel.org as plain text only e-mail. Emails with > > > > HTML will be automatically rejected by the mail server. It could be wise > > > > to also copy the sub-maintainer(s). > > > > > > That works for me. As this is really a personal preference, is there a > > > way it could be encoded in MAINTAINERS in a per-person fashion ? > > > Something that would allow you to opt-out from CC from linux-media (but > > > possibly opt-in for other parts of the kernel), and allow me to opt-in > > > for the drivers I maintain ? > > > > I don't think so. Perhaps we could add, instead, something like that at the > > sub-maintainers section of the profile. > > Of course there is a way to add yourself as a maintainer for a specific > .c file... Maybe people feel like MAINTAINERS is too crowded? > > We could update get_maintainer.pl to grep the .c files for a specific > tag instead of putting everything in a centralized MAINTAINERS file. Another option is to split the MAINTAINERS file into multiple distributed files. get_maintainer.pl already supports that. https://lwn.net/Articles/730509/ https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1501350403.5368.65.camel@perches.com/ > But it doesn't make sense to try store that information MY BRAIN! I > can't remember anything from one minute to the next so I have no idea > who maintains media submodules... Nor I. Nor should I have to. _______________________________________________ Ksummit-discuss mailing list Ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss