From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A0832F83 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 20:28:54 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E1F2B21F; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 20:28:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 22:28:53 +0200 (CEST) From: Jiri Kosina To: James Bottomley cc: ksummit@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [MAINTAINER SUMMIT] Rethinking the acceptance policy for "trivial" patches In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LSU 202 2017-01-01) X-Mailing-List: ksummit@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII On Wed, 21 Apr 2021, Jiri Kosina wrote: > I am all for discussing policy of trivial patches (*), but just to make it > clear -- I don't think that's really directly related to the University of > Minnesota issue. (*) saying that as a de-facto maintainer of trivial.git, although that tree has been severely neglected over the past years. Also, as far as I can say, none of the umn.edu patches went in through the trivial tree Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina Director, SUSE Labs Core