From: Krish Sadhukhan <krish.sadhukhan@oracle.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, jmattson@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7 v7] KVM: nSVM: No need to set bits 11:0 in MSRPM and IOPM bitmaps
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 10:50:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <058d78b9-eddd-95d9-e519-528ad7f2e40a@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YH8y86iPBdTwMT18@google.com>
On 4/20/21 1:00 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021, Krish Sadhukhan wrote:
>> According to APM vol 2, hardware ignores the low 12 bits in MSRPM and IOPM
>> bitmaps. Therefore setting/unssetting these bits has no effect as far as
>> VMRUN is concerned. Also, setting/unsetting these bits prevents tests from
>> verifying hardware behavior.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krish Sadhukhan <krish.sadhukhan@oracle.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c | 2 --
>> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
>> index ae53ae46ebca..fd42c8b7f99a 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
>> @@ -287,8 +287,6 @@ static void nested_load_control_from_vmcb12(struct vcpu_svm *svm,
>>
>> /* Copy it here because nested_svm_check_controls will check it. */
>> svm->nested.ctl.asid = control->asid;
>> - svm->nested.ctl.msrpm_base_pa &= ~0x0fffULL;
>> - svm->nested.ctl.iopm_base_pa &= ~0x0fffULL;
> This will break nested_svm_vmrun_msrpm() if L1 passes an unaligned address.
> The shortlog is also wrong, KVM isn't setting bits, it's clearing bits.
>
> I also don't think svm->nested.ctl.msrpm_base_pa makes its way to hardware; IIUC,
> it's a copy of vmcs12->control.msrpm_base_pa. The bitmap that gets loaded into
> the "real" VMCB is vmcb02->control.msrpm_base_pa.
Not sure if there's a problem with my patch as such, but upon inspecting
the code, I see something missing:
In nested_load_control_from_vmcb12(), we are not really loading
msrpm_base_pa from vmcb12 even though the name of the function
suggests so.
Then nested_vmcb_check_controls() checks msrpm_base_pa from
'nested.ctl' which doesn't have the copy from vmcb12.
Then nested_vmcb02_prepare_control() prepares the vmcb02 copy of
msrpm_base_pa from vmcb01.ptr->control.msrpm_base_pa.
Then nested_svm_vmrun_msrpm() uses msrpm_base_pa from 'nested.ctl'.
Aren't we actually using msrpm_base_pa from vmcb01 instead of vmcb02 ?
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> --
>> 2.27.0
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-22 17:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-12 21:56 [PATCH 0/7 v7] KVM: nSVM: Check addresses of MSR bitmap and IO bitmap tables on vmrun of nested guests Krish Sadhukhan
2021-04-12 21:56 ` [PATCH 1/7 v7] KVM: SVM: Define actual size of IOPM and MSRPM tables Krish Sadhukhan
2021-04-12 21:56 ` [PATCH 2/7 v7] KVM: nSVM: Define an exit code to reflect consistency check failure Krish Sadhukhan
2021-04-17 14:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-04-19 17:57 ` Krish Sadhukhan
2021-04-19 18:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-04-19 18:36 ` Jim Mattson
2021-04-12 21:56 ` [PATCH 3/7 v7] KVM: nSVM: No need to set bits 11:0 in MSRPM and IOPM bitmaps Krish Sadhukhan
2021-04-17 14:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-04-20 20:00 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-04-22 17:50 ` Krish Sadhukhan [this message]
2021-04-22 17:52 ` Krish Sadhukhan
2021-04-22 17:56 ` Krish Sadhukhan
2021-04-22 18:01 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-04-23 1:12 ` Krish Sadhukhan
2021-04-23 15:56 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-04-23 20:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-04-26 21:59 ` Krish Sadhukhan
2021-04-26 22:07 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-04-12 21:56 ` [PATCH 4/7 v7] nSVM: Check addresses of MSR and IO permission maps Krish Sadhukhan
2021-04-12 21:56 ` [PATCH 5/7 v7] SVM: Use ALIGN macro when aligning 'io_bitmap_area' Krish Sadhukhan
2021-04-12 21:56 ` [PATCH 6/7 v7] nSVM: Define an exit code to reflect consistency check failure Krish Sadhukhan
2021-04-12 21:56 ` [PATCH 7/7 v7] nSVM: Test addresses of MSR and IO permissions maps Krish Sadhukhan
2021-04-17 14:35 ` [PATCH 0/7 v7] KVM: nSVM: Check addresses of MSR bitmap and IO bitmap tables on vmrun of nested guests Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=058d78b9-eddd-95d9-e519-528ad7f2e40a@oracle.com \
--to=krish.sadhukhan@oracle.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).