From: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
To: Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Cc: Xieyingtai <xieyingtai@huawei.com>,
"alex.williamson@redhat.com" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
wangxingang <wangxingang5@huawei.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"maz@kernel.org" <maz@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"vivek.gautam@arm.com" <vivek.gautam@arm.com>,
"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
qubingbing <qubingbing@hisilicon.com>,
"Zengtao (B)" <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>,
"zhangfei.gao@linaro.org" <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>,
"eric.auger.pro@gmail.com" <eric.auger.pro@gmail.com>,
"will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
"kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
"robin.murphy@arm.com" <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v13 07/15] iommu/smmuv3: Allow stage 1 invalidation with unmanaged ASIDs
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 17:09:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0bfab7bc762d4356bed81255749f94c3@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d68b6269-ee99-9ed7-de30-867e4519d104@redhat.com>
Hi Eric,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Auger Eric [mailto:eric.auger@redhat.com]
> Sent: 14 January 2021 16:58
> To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>;
> Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
> Cc: Xieyingtai <xieyingtai@huawei.com>; alex.williamson@redhat.com;
> wangxingang <wangxingang5@huawei.com>; kvm@vger.kernel.org;
> maz@kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; vivek.gautam@arm.com;
> iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org; qubingbing <qubingbing@hisilicon.com>;
> Zengtao (B) <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>; zhangfei.gao@linaro.org;
> eric.auger.pro@gmail.com; will@kernel.org; kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu;
> robin.murphy@arm.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 07/15] iommu/smmuv3: Allow stage 1 invalidation with
> unmanaged ASIDs
>
> Hi Shameer, Jean-Philippe,
>
> On 12/4/20 11:23 AM, Auger Eric wrote:
> > Hi Shameer, Jean-Philippe,
> >
> > On 12/4/20 11:20 AM, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote:
> >> Hi Jean,
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Jean-Philippe Brucker [mailto:jean-philippe@linaro.org]
> >>> Sent: 04 December 2020 09:54
> >>> To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
> <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
> >>> Cc: Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com>; wangxingang
> >>> <wangxingang5@huawei.com>; Xieyingtai <xieyingtai@huawei.com>;
> >>> kvm@vger.kernel.org; maz@kernel.org; joro@8bytes.org;
> will@kernel.org;
> >>> iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> >>> vivek.gautam@arm.com; alex.williamson@redhat.com;
> >>> zhangfei.gao@linaro.org; robin.murphy@arm.com;
> >>> kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu; eric.auger.pro@gmail.com; Zengtao (B)
> >>> <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>; qubingbing <qubingbing@hisilicon.com>
> >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 07/15] iommu/smmuv3: Allow stage 1 invalidation
> with
> >>> unmanaged ASIDs
> >>>
> >>> Hi Shameer,
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 06:42:57PM +0000, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
> wrote:
> >>>> Hi Jean/zhangfei,
> >>>> Is it possible to have a branch with minimum required SVA/UACCE related
> >>> patches
> >>>> that are already public and can be a "stable" candidate for future respin
> of
> >>> Eric's series?
> >>>> Please share your thoughts.
> >>>
> >>> By "stable" you mean a fixed branch with the latest SVA/UACCE patches
> >>> based on mainline?
> >>
> >> Yes.
> >>
> >> The uacce-devel branches from
> >>> https://github.com/Linaro/linux-kernel-uadk do provide this at the moment
> >>> (they track the latest sva/zip-devel branch
> >>> https://jpbrucker.net/git/linux/ which is roughly based on mainline.)
> As I plan to respin shortly, please could you confirm the best branch to
> rebase on still is that one (uacce-devel from the linux-kernel-uadk git
> repo). Is it up to date? Commits seem to be quite old there.
I think it is the uacce-devel-5.11 branch, but will wait for Jean or Zhangfei
to confirm.
Thanks,
Shameer
> Thanks
>
> Eric
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> Hi Eric,
> >>
> >> Could you please take a look at the above branches and see whether it make
> sense
> >> to rebase on top of either of those?
> >>
> >> From vSVA point of view, it will be less rebase hassle if we can do that.
> >
> > Sure. I will rebase on top of this ;-)
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Eric
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Shameer
> >>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Jean
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > iommu mailing list
> > iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
> > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-14 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-18 11:21 [PATCH v13 00/15] SMMUv3 Nested Stage Setup (IOMMU part) Eric Auger
2020-11-18 11:21 ` [PATCH v13 01/15] iommu: Introduce attach/detach_pasid_table API Eric Auger
2020-11-18 16:19 ` Jacob Pan
2020-11-19 17:02 ` Auger Eric
2021-02-01 11:27 ` Keqian Zhu
2021-02-01 17:18 ` Auger Eric
2020-11-18 11:21 ` [PATCH v13 02/15] iommu: Introduce bind/unbind_guest_msi Eric Auger
2021-02-01 11:52 ` Keqian Zhu
2021-02-12 8:55 ` Auger Eric
2021-02-18 8:43 ` Keqian Zhu
2021-02-18 10:35 ` Auger Eric
2020-11-18 11:21 ` [PATCH v13 03/15] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Maintain a SID->device structure Eric Auger
2021-02-01 12:26 ` Keqian Zhu
2021-02-01 15:15 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-02-02 6:39 ` Keqian Zhu
2021-02-01 17:19 ` Auger Eric
2021-02-02 7:20 ` Keqian Zhu
2020-11-18 11:21 ` [PATCH v13 04/15] iommu/smmuv3: Allow s1 and s2 configs to coexist Eric Auger
2021-02-01 12:35 ` Keqian Zhu
2020-11-18 11:21 ` [PATCH v13 05/15] iommu/smmuv3: Get prepared for nested stage support Eric Auger
2020-11-19 3:59 ` kernel test robot
[not found] ` <a40b90bd-6756-c8cc-b455-c093d16d35f5@huawei.com>
2020-12-03 13:01 ` Auger Eric
2020-12-03 13:23 ` Kunkun Jiang
2020-12-09 14:26 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-02-02 7:14 ` Keqian Zhu
2021-02-11 17:36 ` Auger Eric
2020-11-18 11:21 ` [PATCH v13 06/15] iommu/smmuv3: Implement attach/detach_pasid_table Eric Auger
2021-02-02 8:03 ` Keqian Zhu
2021-02-11 17:35 ` Auger Eric
2020-11-18 11:21 ` [PATCH v13 07/15] iommu/smmuv3: Allow stage 1 invalidation with unmanaged ASIDs Eric Auger
2020-12-01 13:33 ` Xingang Wang
2020-12-01 13:58 ` Auger Eric
2020-12-02 12:59 ` Wang Xingang
2020-12-03 18:42 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2020-12-04 9:53 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-12-04 10:20 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2020-12-04 10:23 ` Auger Eric
2021-01-14 16:58 ` Auger Eric
2021-01-14 17:09 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi [this message]
2021-01-14 17:33 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-14 18:00 ` Auger Eric
2021-02-15 13:17 ` Auger Eric
2020-11-18 11:21 ` [PATCH v13 08/15] iommu/smmuv3: Implement cache_invalidate Eric Auger
2020-11-18 11:21 ` [PATCH v13 09/15] dma-iommu: Implement NESTED_MSI cookie Eric Auger
2020-11-18 11:21 ` [PATCH v13 10/15] iommu/smmuv3: Nested mode single MSI doorbell per domain enforcement Eric Auger
2020-11-18 11:21 ` [PATCH v13 11/15] iommu/smmuv3: Enforce incompatibility between nested mode and HW MSI regions Eric Auger
2020-11-18 11:21 ` [PATCH v13 12/15] iommu/smmuv3: Implement bind/unbind_guest_msi Eric Auger
2020-11-18 11:21 ` [PATCH v13 13/15] iommu/smmuv3: Report non recoverable faults Eric Auger
2020-11-18 11:21 ` [PATCH v13 14/15] iommu/smmuv3: Accept configs with more than one context descriptor Eric Auger
2020-11-18 11:21 ` [PATCH v13 15/15] iommu/smmuv3: Add PASID cache invalidation per PASID Eric Auger
2021-01-08 17:05 ` [PATCH v13 00/15] SMMUv3 Nested Stage Setup (IOMMU part) Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-01-13 15:37 ` Auger Eric
2021-02-21 18:21 ` Auger Eric
2021-02-22 8:56 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-03-15 18:04 ` Krishna Reddy
2021-03-16 8:22 ` Auger Eric
2021-03-16 18:10 ` Krishna Reddy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0bfab7bc762d4356bed81255749f94c3@huawei.com \
--to=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.auger.pro@gmail.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=prime.zeng@hisilicon.com \
--cc=qubingbing@hisilicon.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=vivek.gautam@arm.com \
--cc=wangxingang5@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xieyingtai@huawei.com \
--cc=zhangfei.gao@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).