kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC patch 14/15] workpending: Provide infrastructure for work before entering a guest
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 17:40:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0cc964dc-4d00-05ec-1ed1-f6cee7370d7b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190919150809.860645841@linutronix.de>

Quick API review before I dive into the implementation.

On 19/09/19 17:03, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> +	/*
> +	 * Before returning to guest mode handle all pending work
> +	 */
> +	if (ti_work & _TIF_SIGPENDING) {
> +		vcpu->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_INTR;
> +		vcpu->stat.signal_exits++;
> +		return -EINTR;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (ti_work & _TIF_NEED_RESCHED) {
> +		srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, vcpu->srcu_idx);
> +		schedule();
> +		vcpu->srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (ti_work & _TIF_PATCH_PENDING) {
> +		srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, vcpu->srcu_idx);
> +		klp_update_patch_state(current);
> +		vcpu->srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (ti_work & _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME) {
> +		srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, vcpu->srcu_idx);
> +		clear_thread_flag(TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME);
> +		tracehook_notify_resume(NULL);
> +		vcpu->srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Any extra architecture specific work */
> +	return arch_exit_to_guestmode_work(kvm, vcpu, ti_work);
> +}

Perhaps, in virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:

int kvm_exit_to_guestmode_work(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
				unsigned long ti_work)
{
	int r;

	/*
	 * Before returning to guest mode handle all pending work
	 */
	if (ti_work & _TIF_SIGPENDING) {
		vcpu->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_INTR;
		vcpu->stat.signal_exits++;
		return -EINTR;
	}

	srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, vcpu->srcu_idx);
	core_exit_to_guestmode_work(ti_work);
	vcpu->srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);

	return r;
}

and in kernel/entry/common.c:

int core_exit_to_guestmode_work(unsigned long ti_work)
{
	/*
	 * Before returning to guest mode handle all pending work
	 */
	if (ti_work & _TIF_NEED_RESCHED)
		schedule();

	if (ti_work & _TIF_PATCH_PENDING)
		klp_update_patch_state(current);

	if (ti_work & _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME) {
		clear_thread_flag(TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME);
		tracehook_notify_resume(NULL);
	}
	return arch_exit_to_guestmode_work(ti_work);
}

so that kernel/entry/ is not polluted with KVM structs and APIs.

Perhaps even extract the body of core_exit_to_usermode_work's while loop
to a separate function, and call it as

	core_exit_to_usermode_work_once(NULL,
				ti_work & EXIT_TO_GUESTMODE_WORK);

from core_exit_to_guestmode_work.

In general I don't mind having these exit_to_guestmode functions in
kvm_host.h, and only having entry-common.h export EXIT_TO_GUESTMODE_WORK
and ARCH_EXIT_TO_GUESTMODE_WORK.  Unless you had good reasons to do the
opposite...

Paolo


  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-19 15:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-19 15:03 [RFC patch 00/15] entry: Provide generic implementation for host and guest entry/exit work Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-19 15:03 ` [RFC patch 01/15] entry: Provide generic syscall entry functionality Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-20 23:38   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-10-20 11:49     ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-23  9:05   ` Mike Rapoport
2019-09-19 15:03 ` [RFC patch 02/15] x86/entry: Remove _TIF_NOHZ from _TIF_WORK_SYSCALL_ENTRY Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-20 23:39   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-09-23 20:43     ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-19 15:03 ` [RFC patch 03/15] x86/entry: Use generic syscall entry function Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-20 23:41   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-09-23  8:31     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-23  8:40       ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-19 15:03 ` [RFC patch 04/15] arm64/entry: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-20 12:21   ` Catalin Marinas
2019-09-19 15:03 ` [RFC patch 05/15] entry: Provide generic syscall exit function Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-19 15:03 ` [RFC patch 06/15] x86/entry: Use generic syscall exit functionality Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-19 15:03 ` [RFC patch 07/15] arm64/syscall: Remove obscure flag check Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-20 14:29   ` Catalin Marinas
2019-09-19 15:03 ` [RFC patch 08/15] arm64/syscall: Use generic syscall exit functionality Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-19 15:03 ` [RFC patch 09/15] entry: Provide generic exit to usermode functionality Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-23  8:30   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-19 15:03 ` [RFC patch 10/15] x86/entry: Move irq tracing to C code Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-23  8:47   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-23 10:27     ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-23 11:49       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-23 11:55         ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-23 12:10           ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-23 17:24             ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-09-26  2:59   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-09-19 15:03 ` [RFC patch 11/15] x86/entry: Use generic exit to usermode Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-19 15:03 ` [RFC patch 12/15] arm64/entry: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-19 15:03 ` [RFC patch 13/15] arm64/entry: Move FPU restore out of exit_to_usermode() loop Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-19 15:03 ` [RFC patch 14/15] workpending: Provide infrastructure for work before entering a guest Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-19 15:40   ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2019-09-20 11:48     ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-23 18:17   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-09-26 11:35   ` Miroslav Benes
2019-09-19 15:03 ` [RFC patch 15/15] x86/kvm: Use GENERIC_EXIT_WORKPENDING Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-19 15:40   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-09-20 15:12 ` [RFC patch 00/15] entry: Provide generic implementation for host and guest entry/exit work Mark Rutland
2019-09-23 20:50   ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-23 18:18 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-09-24  6:50 ` Christian Borntraeger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0cc964dc-4d00-05ec-1ed1-f6cee7370d7b@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).