From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] KVM: nVMX: Introduce nested_evmcs_is_used()
Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 15:54:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <115fcae7-0c88-4865-6494-bdf6fb672382@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210517135054.1914802-2-vkuznets@redhat.com>
On 17/05/21 15:50, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Unlike regular set_current_vmptr(), nested_vmx_handle_enlightened_vmptrld()
> can not be called directly from vmx_set_nested_state() as KVM may not have
> all the information yet (e.g. HV_X64_MSR_VP_ASSIST_PAGE MSR may not be
> restored yet). Enlightened VMCS is mapped later while getting nested state
> pages. In the meantime, vmx->nested.hv_evmcs remains NULL and using it
> for various checks is incorrect. In particular, if KVM_GET_NESTED_STATE is
> called right after KVM_SET_NESTED_STATE, KVM_STATE_NESTED_EVMCS flag in the
> resulting state will be unset (and such state will later fail to load).
>
> Introduce nested_evmcs_is_used() and use 'is_guest_mode(vcpu) &&
> vmx->nested.current_vmptr == -1ull' check to detect not-yet-mapped eVMCS
> after restore.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Would it make sense to instead use hv_evmcs_ptr, making the unused
value -1 instead of 0?
I even had this untested patch already lying around as a cleanup I
never bothered to submit:
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
index a19cfcb625da..dd3e4ddaaf26 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ static int nested_vmx_fail(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 vm_instruction_error)
* failValid writes the error number to the current VMCS, which
* can't be done if there isn't a current VMCS.
*/
- if (vmx->nested.current_vmptr == -1ull && !vmx->nested.hv_evmcs)
+ if (vmx->nested.current_vmptr == -1ull && vmx->nested.hv_evmcs_vmptr == -1)
return nested_vmx_failInvalid(vcpu);
return nested_vmx_failValid(vcpu, vm_instruction_error);
@@ -221,11 +221,11 @@ static inline void nested_release_evmcs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
- if (!vmx->nested.hv_evmcs)
+ if (vmx->nested.hv_evmcs_vmptr == -1)
return;
kvm_vcpu_unmap(vcpu, &vmx->nested.hv_evmcs_map, NULL, true);
- vmx->nested.hv_evmcs_vmptr = 0;
+ vmx->nested.hv_evmcs_vmptr = -1;
vmx->nested.hv_evmcs = NULL;
}
@@ -1978,10 +1978,8 @@ static enum nested_evmptrld_status nested_vmx_handle_enlightened_vmptrld(
if (!nested_enlightened_vmentry(vcpu, &evmcs_gpa))
return EVMPTRLD_DISABLED;
- if (unlikely(!vmx->nested.hv_evmcs ||
- evmcs_gpa != vmx->nested.hv_evmcs_vmptr)) {
- if (!vmx->nested.hv_evmcs)
- vmx->nested.current_vmptr = -1ull;
+ if (unlikely(evmcs_gpa != vmx->nested.hv_evmcs_vmptr)) {
+ vmx->nested.current_vmptr = -1ull;
nested_release_evmcs(vcpu);
@@ -2052,7 +2050,7 @@ void nested_sync_vmcs12_to_shadow(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
- if (vmx->nested.hv_evmcs) {
+ if (vmx->nested.hv_evmcs_vmptr != -1) {
copy_vmcs12_to_enlightened(vmx);
/* All fields are clean */
vmx->nested.hv_evmcs->hv_clean_fields |=
@@ -2204,7 +2202,7 @@ static void prepare_vmcs02_early(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
u32 exec_control;
u64 guest_efer = nested_vmx_calc_efer(vmx, vmcs12);
- if (vmx->nested.dirty_vmcs12 || vmx->nested.hv_evmcs)
+ if (vmx->nested.dirty_vmcs12 || vmx->nested.hv_evmcs_vmptr != -1)
prepare_vmcs02_early_rare(vmx, vmcs12);
/*
@@ -2487,9 +2485,8 @@ static int prepare_vmcs02(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vmcs12 *vmcs12,
enum vm_entry_failure_code *entry_failure_code)
{
struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
- struct hv_enlightened_vmcs *hv_evmcs = vmx->nested.hv_evmcs;
- if (vmx->nested.dirty_vmcs12 || hv_evmcs) {
+ if (vmx->nested.dirty_vmcs12 || vmx->nested.hv_evmcs_vmptr != -1) {
prepare_vmcs02_rare(vmx, vmcs12);
vmx->nested.dirty_vmcs12 = false;
}
@@ -3075,7 +3072,7 @@ static bool nested_get_evmcs_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
* L2 was running), map it here to make sure vmcs12 changes are
* properly reflected.
*/
- if (vmx->nested.enlightened_vmcs_enabled && !vmx->nested.hv_evmcs) {
+ if (vmx->nested.enlightened_vmcs_enabled && vmx->nested.hv_evmcs_vmptr == -1) {
enum nested_evmptrld_status evmptrld_status =
nested_vmx_handle_enlightened_vmptrld(vcpu, false);
@@ -3419,7 +3416,7 @@ enum nvmx_vmentry_status nested_vmx_enter_non_root_mode(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
load_vmcs12_host_state(vcpu, vmcs12);
vmcs12->vm_exit_reason = exit_reason.full;
- if (enable_shadow_vmcs || vmx->nested.hv_evmcs)
+ if (enable_shadow_vmcs || vmx->nested.hv_evmcs_vmptr != -1)
vmx->nested.need_vmcs12_to_shadow_sync = true;
return NVMX_VMENTRY_VMEXIT;
}
@@ -3449,7 +3446,7 @@ static int nested_vmx_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool launch)
return nested_vmx_failInvalid(vcpu);
}
- if (CC(!vmx->nested.hv_evmcs && vmx->nested.current_vmptr == -1ull))
+ if (CC(vmx->nested.hv_evmcs_vmptr == -1 && vmx->nested.current_vmptr == -1ull))
return nested_vmx_failInvalid(vcpu);
vmcs12 = get_vmcs12(vcpu);
@@ -3463,7 +3460,7 @@ static int nested_vmx_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool launch)
if (CC(vmcs12->hdr.shadow_vmcs))
return nested_vmx_failInvalid(vcpu);
- if (vmx->nested.hv_evmcs) {
+ if (vmx->nested.hv_evmcs_vmptr != -1) {
copy_enlightened_to_vmcs12(vmx);
/* Enlightened VMCS doesn't have launch state */
vmcs12->launch_state = !launch;
@@ -4014,10 +4011,10 @@ static void sync_vmcs02_to_vmcs12(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
{
struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
- if (vmx->nested.hv_evmcs)
+ if (vmx->nested.hv_evmcs_vmptr != -1)
sync_vmcs02_to_vmcs12_rare(vcpu, vmcs12);
- vmx->nested.need_sync_vmcs02_to_vmcs12_rare = !vmx->nested.hv_evmcs;
+ vmx->nested.need_sync_vmcs02_to_vmcs12_rare = (vmx->nested.hv_evmcs_vmptr == -1);
vmcs12->guest_cr0 = vmcs12_guest_cr0(vcpu, vmcs12);
vmcs12->guest_cr4 = vmcs12_guest_cr4(vcpu, vmcs12);
@@ -4514,7 +4511,7 @@ void nested_vmx_vmexit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 vm_exit_reason,
}
if ((vm_exit_reason != -1) &&
- (enable_shadow_vmcs || vmx->nested.hv_evmcs))
+ (enable_shadow_vmcs || vmx->nested.hv_evmcs_vmptr != -1))
vmx->nested.need_vmcs12_to_shadow_sync = true;
/* in case we halted in L2 */
@@ -5210,7 +5207,7 @@ static int handle_vmptrld(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
return nested_vmx_fail(vcpu, VMXERR_VMPTRLD_VMXON_POINTER);
/* Forbid normal VMPTRLD if Enlightened version was used */
- if (vmx->nested.hv_evmcs)
+ if (vmx->nested.hv_evmcs_vmptr != -1)
return 1;
if (vmx->nested.current_vmptr != vmptr) {
@@ -5266,7 +5263,7 @@ static int handle_vmptrst(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
if (!nested_vmx_check_permission(vcpu))
return 1;
- if (unlikely(to_vmx(vcpu)->nested.hv_evmcs))
+ if (unlikely(to_vmx(vcpu)->nested.hv_evmcs_vmptr != -1))
return 1;
if (get_vmx_mem_address(vcpu, exit_qual, instr_info,
@@ -6038,7 +6035,7 @@ static int vmx_get_nested_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
if (vmx_has_valid_vmcs12(vcpu)) {
kvm_state.size += sizeof(user_vmx_nested_state->vmcs12);
- if (vmx->nested.hv_evmcs)
+ if (vmx->nested.hv_evmcs_vmptr != -1)
kvm_state.flags |= KVM_STATE_NESTED_EVMCS;
if (is_guest_mode(vcpu) &&
@@ -6094,7 +6091,7 @@ static int vmx_get_nested_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
} else {
copy_vmcs02_to_vmcs12_rare(vcpu, get_vmcs12(vcpu));
if (!vmx->nested.need_vmcs12_to_shadow_sync) {
- if (vmx->nested.hv_evmcs)
+ if (vmx->nested.hv_evmcs_vmptr != -1)
copy_enlightened_to_vmcs12(vmx);
else if (enable_shadow_vmcs)
copy_shadow_to_vmcs12(vmx);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.h
index 184418baeb3c..55925be48973 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.h
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static inline int vmx_has_valid_vmcs12(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
* have vmcs12 if it is true.
*/
return is_guest_mode(vcpu) || vmx->nested.current_vmptr != -1ull ||
- vmx->nested.hv_evmcs;
+ vmx->nested.hv_evmcs_vmptr != -1;
}
static inline u16 nested_get_vpid02(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index f2fd447eed45..33208aa4ac87 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -6974,6 +6974,7 @@ static int vmx_create_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
vmx->nested.posted_intr_nv = -1;
vmx->nested.current_vmptr = -1ull;
+ vmx->nested.hv_evmcs_vmptr = -1;
vcpu->arch.microcode_version = 0x100000000ULL;
vmx->msr_ia32_feature_control_valid_bits = FEAT_CTL_LOCKED;
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-24 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-17 13:50 [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: nVMX: Fixes for nested state migration when eVMCS is in use Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-05-17 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] KVM: nVMX: Introduce nested_evmcs_is_used() Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-05-24 12:11 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-24 12:35 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-05-26 14:34 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-27 7:54 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-05-27 14:10 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-24 13:54 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2021-05-24 14:09 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-05-24 14:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-24 14:37 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-05-17 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] KVM: nVMX: Release enlightened VMCS on VMCLEAR Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-05-24 12:13 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-17 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] KVM: nVMX: Ignore 'hv_clean_fields' data when eVMCS data is copied in vmx_get_nested_state() Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-05-24 12:26 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-24 13:01 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-05-24 13:58 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-26 14:44 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-24 13:56 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-24 14:12 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-05-17 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] KVM: nVMX: Force enlightened VMCS sync from nested_vmx_failValid() Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-05-24 12:27 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-17 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] KVM: nVMX: Reset eVMCS clean fields data from prepare_vmcs02() Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-05-24 12:34 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-24 13:07 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-05-17 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] KVM: nVMX: Request to sync eVMCS from VMCS12 after migration Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-05-24 12:35 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-17 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] KVM: selftests: evmcs_test: Test that KVM_STATE_NESTED_EVMCS is never lost Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-05-24 12:36 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-24 12:08 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: nVMX: Fixes for nested state migration when eVMCS is in use Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-24 12:44 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-05-26 14:41 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-27 8:01 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-05-27 14:11 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-27 14:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-24 14:01 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=115fcae7-0c88-4865-6494-bdf6fb672382@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).