From: Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@intel.com>
To: pbonzini@redhat.com, jmattson@google.com, seanjc@google.com,
like.xu.linux@gmail.com, vkuznets@redhat.com,
wei.w.wang@intel.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>,
Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v8 04/15] KVM: vmx/pmu: Emulate MSR_ARCH_LBR_DEPTH for guest Arch LBR
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 15:56:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1629791777-16430-5-git-send-email-weijiang.yang@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1629791777-16430-1-git-send-email-weijiang.yang@intel.com>
From: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>
The number of Arch LBR entries available is determined by the value
in host MSR_ARCH_LBR_DEPTH.DEPTH. The supported LBR depth values are
enumerated in CPUID.(EAX=01CH, ECX=0):EAX[7:0]. For each bit "n" set
in this field, the MSR_ARCH_LBR_DEPTH.DEPTH value of "8*(n+1)" is
supported.
On a guest write to MSR_ARCH_LBR_DEPTH, all LBR entries are reset to 0.
KVM writes guest requested value to the native ARCH_LBR_DEPTH MSR
(this is safe because the two values will be the same) when the Arch LBR
records MSRs are pass-through to the guest.
Signed-off-by: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@intel.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 ++
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 974cbfb1eefe..a93b77b10933 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -515,6 +515,9 @@ struct kvm_pmu {
* redundant check before cleanup if guest don't use vPMU at all.
*/
u8 event_count;
+
+ /* Guest arch lbr depth supported by KVM. */
+ u64 kvm_arch_lbr_depth;
};
struct kvm_pmu_ops;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
index 9efc1a6b8693..cddc23689846 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ static bool intel_pmu_is_valid_lbr_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 index)
static bool intel_is_valid_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr)
{
struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
- int ret;
+ int ret = 0;
switch (msr) {
case MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR_CTRL:
@@ -220,6 +220,10 @@ static bool intel_is_valid_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr)
case MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_OVF_CTRL:
ret = pmu->version > 1;
break;
+ case MSR_ARCH_LBR_DEPTH:
+ if (kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR))
+ ret = guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR);
+ break;
default:
ret = get_gp_pmc(pmu, msr, MSR_IA32_PERFCTR0) ||
get_gp_pmc(pmu, msr, MSR_P6_EVNTSEL0) ||
@@ -348,10 +352,26 @@ static bool intel_pmu_handle_lbr_msrs_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
return true;
}
+/*
+ * Check if the requested depth value the same as that of host.
+ * When guest/host depth are different, the handling would be tricky,
+ * so now only max depth is supported for both host and guest.
+ */
+static bool arch_lbr_depth_is_valid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 depth)
+{
+ struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
+
+ if (!kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR))
+ return false;
+
+ return (depth == pmu->kvm_arch_lbr_depth);
+}
+
static int intel_pmu_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
{
struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
struct kvm_pmc *pmc;
+ struct lbr_desc *lbr_desc = vcpu_to_lbr_desc(vcpu);
u32 msr = msr_info->index;
switch (msr) {
@@ -367,6 +387,9 @@ static int intel_pmu_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
case MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_OVF_CTRL:
msr_info->data = pmu->global_ovf_ctrl;
return 0;
+ case MSR_ARCH_LBR_DEPTH:
+ msr_info->data = lbr_desc->records.nr;
+ return 0;
default:
if ((pmc = get_gp_pmc(pmu, msr, MSR_IA32_PERFCTR0)) ||
(pmc = get_gp_pmc(pmu, msr, MSR_IA32_PMC0))) {
@@ -393,8 +416,10 @@ static int intel_pmu_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
{
struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
struct kvm_pmc *pmc;
+ struct lbr_desc *lbr_desc = vcpu_to_lbr_desc(vcpu);
u32 msr = msr_info->index;
u64 data = msr_info->data;
+ u64 lbr_ctl;
switch (msr) {
case MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR_CTRL:
@@ -427,6 +452,30 @@ static int intel_pmu_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
return 0;
}
break;
+ case MSR_ARCH_LBR_DEPTH:
+ if (!arch_lbr_depth_is_valid(vcpu, data))
+ return 1;
+ lbr_desc->records.nr = data;
+ if (msr_info->host_initiated)
+ return 0;
+
+ rdmsrl(MSR_ARCH_LBR_CTL, lbr_ctl);
+ /*
+ * If the host is using Arch LBR on this CPU at this point,
+ * then reject guest's request.
+ */
+ if (lbr_ctl & ARCH_LBR_CTL_LBREN && !lbr_desc->event)
+ return 1;
+ /* If the event has been sched out, we don't write the msr.*/
+ if (lbr_desc->event &&
+ lbr_desc->event->state < PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE)
+ return 1;
+ /*
+ * Otherwise, guest is programming the depth MSR or reset lbr records
+ * via short-cut, then allow write to the MSR.
+ */
+ wrmsrl(MSR_ARCH_LBR_DEPTH, lbr_desc->records.nr);
+ return 0;
default:
if ((pmc = get_gp_pmc(pmu, msr, MSR_IA32_PERFCTR0)) ||
(pmc = get_gp_pmc(pmu, msr, MSR_IA32_PMC0))) {
@@ -540,6 +589,18 @@ static void intel_pmu_refresh(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
if (lbr_desc->records.nr)
bitmap_set(pmu->all_valid_pmc_idx, INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED_VLBR, 1);
+
+ if (!kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR))
+ return;
+
+ entry = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 28, 0);
+ if (entry) {
+ /*
+ * The depth mask in CPUID has been forced by KVM to that of host
+ * supported value when user-space sets guest CPUID.
+ */
+ pmu->kvm_arch_lbr_depth = fls(entry->eax & 0xff) * 8;
+ }
}
static void intel_pmu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-24 7:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-24 7:56 [PATCH v8 00/15] Introduce Architectural LBR for vPMU Yang Weijiang
2021-08-24 7:56 ` [PATCH v8 01/15] perf/x86/intel: Fix the comment about guest LBR support on KVM Yang Weijiang
2021-08-24 7:56 ` [PATCH v8 02/15] perf/x86/lbr: Simplify the exposure check for the LBR_INFO registers Yang Weijiang
2021-08-24 7:56 ` [PATCH v8 03/15] KVM: x86: Add Arch LBR MSRs to msrs_to_save_all list Yang Weijiang
2021-08-24 7:56 ` Yang Weijiang [this message]
2021-08-24 7:56 ` [PATCH v8 05/15] KVM: vmx/pmu: Emulate MSR_ARCH_LBR_CTL for guest Arch LBR Yang Weijiang
2021-08-25 7:59 ` kernel test robot
2021-08-27 1:06 ` kernel test robot
2021-08-24 7:56 ` [PATCH v8 06/15] KVM: x86/pmu: Refactor code to support " Yang Weijiang
2021-08-24 7:56 ` [PATCH v8 07/15] KVM: x86: Refresh CPUID on writes to MSR_IA32_XSS Yang Weijiang
2021-08-24 7:56 ` [PATCH v8 08/15] KVM: x86: Report XSS as an MSR to be saved if there are supported features Yang Weijiang
2021-08-24 7:56 ` [PATCH v8 09/15] KVM: x86: Refine the matching and clearing logic for supported_xss Yang Weijiang
2021-08-24 7:56 ` [PATCH v8 10/15] KVM: x86: Add XSAVE Support for Architectural LBR Yang Weijiang
2021-08-24 7:56 ` [PATCH v8 11/15] KVM: x86/vmx: Check Arch LBR config when return perf capabilities Yang Weijiang
2021-08-24 7:56 ` [PATCH v8 12/15] KVM: nVMX: Add necessary Arch LBR settings for nested VM Yang Weijiang
2021-08-24 7:56 ` [PATCH v8 13/15] KVM: x86/vmx: Clear Arch LBREn bit before inject #DB to guest Yang Weijiang
2021-08-24 7:56 ` [PATCH v8 14/15] KVM: x86/vmx: Flip Arch LBREn bit on guest state change Yang Weijiang
2021-08-24 7:56 ` [PATCH v8 15/15] KVM: x86/cpuid: Advise Arch LBR feature in CPUID Yang Weijiang
2021-10-15 0:01 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-10-15 1:28 ` Yang Weijiang
2021-10-15 2:05 ` Like Xu
2021-10-15 14:49 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-07 3:26 ` [PATCH v8 00/15] Introduce Architectural LBR for vPMU Yang Weijiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1629791777-16430-5-git-send-email-weijiang.yang@intel.com \
--to=weijiang.yang@intel.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=like.xu.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=like.xu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).