kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	joerg.roedel@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: MMU: Segregate mmu pages created with different cr4.pge settings
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 12:11:51 -0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090106141151.GA3701@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49633564.7070403@redhat.com>

On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 12:41:40PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Alexander Graf wrote:
>> Avi Kivity wrote:
>>   
>>> From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
>>>
>>> Don't allow a vcpu with cr4.pge cleared to use a shadow page created with
>>> cr4.pge set; this might cause a cr3 switch not to sync ptes that have the
>>> global bit set (the global bit has no effect if !cr4.pge).
>>>
>>> This can only occur on smp with different cr4.pge settings for different
>>> vcpus (since a cr4 change will resync the shadow ptes), but there's no
>>> cost to being correct here.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>>> index f49bfd0..ab8ef1d 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>>> @@ -183,6 +183,7 @@ union kvm_mmu_page_role {
>>>  		unsigned metaphysical:1;
>>>  		unsigned access:3;
>>>  		unsigned invalid:1;
>>> +		unsigned cr4_pge:1;
>>>  	};
>>>  };
>>>  diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>>> index c4da7fb..aa4575c 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>>> @@ -363,6 +363,7 @@ void kvm_set_cr4(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr4)
>>>  	}
>>>  	kvm_x86_ops->set_cr4(vcpu, cr4);
>>>  	vcpu->arch.cr4 = cr4;
>>> +	vcpu->arch.mmu.base_role.cr4_pge = !!(cr4 & X86_CR4_PGE);
>>>       
>>
>> This line broke VMware ESX bootup using NPT on one VCPU for me. If I
>> comment it out and apply my patches to actually make ESX run, it boots
>> again.
>>   
>
> I think this might be the problem:
>
>> static int mmu_need_write_protect(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn,
>>                   bool can_unsync)
>> {
>>     struct kvm_mmu_page *shadow;
>>
>>     shadow = kvm_mmu_lookup_page(vcpu->kvm, gfn);
>>     if (shadow) {
>>         if (shadow->role.level != PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL)
>>             return 1;
>>         if (shadow->unsync)
>>             return 0;
>>         if (can_unsync && oos_shadow)
>>             return kvm_unsync_page(vcpu, shadow);
>>         return 1;
>>     }
>>     return 0;
>> }
>>
>
> lookup_page() is not deterministic if there are multiple shadows for a  
> page, and the patch increases multiple shadows.
>
> Marcelo, shouldn't there be a for_each in there?

static int kvm_unsync_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp) {

        unsigned index;
        struct hlist_head *bucket;
        struct kvm_mmu_page *s;
        struct hlist_node *node, *n;

        index = kvm_page_table_hashfn(sp->gfn);
        bucket = &vcpu->kvm->arch.mmu_page_hash[index];
        /* don't unsync if pagetable is shadowed with multiple roles */
        hlist_for_each_entry_safe(s, node, n, bucket, hash_link) {
                if (s->gfn != sp->gfn || s->role.metaphysical)
                        continue;
                if (s->role.word != sp->role.word)
                        return 1;
        }

This one?


  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-06 14:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20081221184146.8E00B250012@cleopatra.tlv.redhat.com>
2009-01-05 14:56 ` [PATCH] KVM: MMU: Segregate mmu pages created with different cr4.pge settings Alexander Graf
2009-01-06 10:41   ` Avi Kivity
2009-01-06 14:11     ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2009-01-06 14:29       ` Avi Kivity
2009-01-06 15:06         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-01-06 16:43         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-01-07  6:49           ` Alexander Graf
2009-01-07 10:19             ` Avi Kivity
2009-01-07 10:43               ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-01-07 11:32                 ` Avi Kivity
2009-01-07 13:46                   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-01-08 19:53                     ` Alexander Graf
2009-01-09  0:36                       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-01-09 10:43                         ` Alexander Graf
2009-01-11  9:12 Marcelo Tosatti
2009-01-11  9:20 ` Avi Kivity

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090106141151.GA3701@amt.cnet \
    --to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).