From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Herbert Xu Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/17] virtual-bus Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 17:41:47 +0800 Message-ID: <20090402094147.GA30586@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <20090402085253.GA29932@gondor.apana.org.au> <49D47F11.6070400@redhat.com> <20090402091639.GA30126@gondor.apana.org.au> <49D484F5.2000400@redhat.com> <20090402092936.GA30333@gondor.apana.org.au> <49D487A6.407@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: ghaskins@novell.com, anthony@codemonkey.ws, andi@firstfloor.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, agraf@suse.de, pmullaney@novell.com, pmorreale@novell.com, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49D487A6.407@redhat.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 12:38:46PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > > Why does a kernel solution not need to know when a packet is transmitted? Because you can install your own destructor? I don't know what Greg did, but netback did that nasty page destructor hack which Jeremy is trying to undo :) Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt