From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marc Zyngier Subject: [PATCH v3 01/59] genirq: Let irq_set_vcpu_affinity() iterate over hierarchy Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 18:25:39 +0100 Message-ID: <20170731172637.29355-2-marc.zyngier@arm.com> References: <20170731172637.29355-1-marc.zyngier@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jason Cooper , Thomas Gleixner To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170731172637.29355-1-marc.zyngier@arm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org When assigning an interrupt to a vcpu, it is not unlikely that the level of the hierarchy implementing irq_set_vcpu_affinity is not the top level (think a generic MSI domain on top of a virtualization aware interrupt controller). In such a case, let's iterate over the hierarchy until we find an irqchip implementing it. Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier --- kernel/irq/manage.c | 14 ++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c index 1d1a5b945ab4..573dc52b0806 100644 --- a/kernel/irq/manage.c +++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c @@ -400,8 +400,18 @@ int irq_set_vcpu_affinity(unsigned int irq, void *vcpu_info) return -EINVAL; data = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc); - chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip(data); - if (chip && chip->irq_set_vcpu_affinity) + do { + chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip(data); + if (chip && chip->irq_set_vcpu_affinity) + break; +#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY + data = data->parent_data; +#else + data = NULL; +#endif + } while (data); + + if (data) ret = chip->irq_set_vcpu_affinity(data, vcpu_info); irq_put_desc_unlock(desc, flags); -- 2.11.0