From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/fpu: Disable BH while while loading FPU registers in __fpu__restore_sig() Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 18:31:36 +0100 Message-ID: <20181119173135.sqxemqwfpuzszyfb@linutronix.de> References: <20181119160410.ne7oiq2gkwt6jiqg@linutronix.de> <20181119171128.2lxnhga3pym2zlok@linutronix.de> <20181119172743.GE14688@zn.tnic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Cc: Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski , Paolo Bonzini , Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= , kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Jason A. Donenfeld" , Rik van Riel , Dave Hansen To: Borislav Petkov Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181119172743.GE14688@zn.tnic> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 2018-11-19 18:27:43 [+0100], Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 06:11:29PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > On 2018-11-19 09:02:45 [-0800], Dave Hansen wrote: > > > On 11/19/18 8:04 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > > > v1…v2: A more verbose commit as message. > > > > > > I was really hoping for code comments. :) > > > > I though we agreed to make those in the larger series because those > > comments in __fpu__restore_sig() would be removed anyway (as part of the > > series). > > Also, over local_bh_disable() does not really fit as this is generic > code and Sebastian said ARM does the whole thing a bit differently, for > one. > > We probably should put that comment somewhere prominent in > arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c or similar - somewhere people poking at FPU > stuff will see it. I though about __fpregs_changes_begin() in the last patch of the commit: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bigeasy/staging.git/commit/?h=x86_fpu_rtu_v4 Sebastian