kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>,
	Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] s390: vfio-ccw code rework
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 15:32:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190617153228.0c5dca9f.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190606202831.44135-1-farman@linux.ibm.com>

On Thu,  6 Jun 2019 22:28:22 +0200
Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> Now that we've gotten a lot of other series either merged or
> pending for the next merge window, I'd like to revisit some
> code simplification that I started many moons ago.
> 
> In that first series, a couple of fixes got merged into 4.20,
> a couple more got some "seems okay" acks/reviews, and the rest
> were nearly forgotten about.  I dusted them off and did quite a
> bit of rework to make things a little more sequential and
> providing a better narrative (I think) based on the lessons we
> learned in my earlier changes.  Because of this rework, the
> acks/reviews on the first version didn't really translate to the
> code that exists here (patch 1 being the closest exception), so
> I didn't apply any of them here.  The end result is mostly the
> same as before, but now looks like this:
> 
> Patch summary:
> 1:   Squash duplicate code
> 2-4: Remove duplicate code in CCW processor
> 5-7: Remove one layer of nested arrays
> 8-9: Combine direct/indirect addressing CCW processors
> 
> Using 5.2.0-rc3 as a base plus the vfio-ccw branch of recent fixes,
> we shrink the code quite a bit (8.7% according to the bloat-o-meter),
> and we remove one set of mallocs/frees on the I/O path by removing
> one layer of the nested arrays.  There are no functional/behavioral
> changes with this series; all the tests that I would run previously
> continue to pass/fail as they today.
> 
> Changelog:
>  v1/RFC->v2:
>   - [Eric] Dropped first two patches, as they have been merged
>   - [Eric] Shuffling of patches for readability/understandability
>   - [Halil] Actually added meaningful comments/commit messages
>     in the patches
>  v1/RFC: https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/10675251/
> 
> Eric Farman (9):
>   s390/cio: Squash cp_free() and cp_unpin_free()
>   s390/cio: Refactor the routine that handles TIC CCWs
>   s390/cio: Generalize the TIC handler
>   s390/cio: Use generalized CCW handler in cp_init()
>   vfio-ccw: Rearrange pfn_array and pfn_array_table arrays
>   vfio-ccw: Adjust the first IDAW outside of the nested loops
>   vfio-ccw: Remove pfn_array_table
>   vfio-ccw: Rearrange IDAL allocation in direct CCW
>   s390/cio: Combine direct and indirect CCW paths
> 
>  drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c | 313 +++++++++++----------------------
>  1 file changed, 102 insertions(+), 211 deletions(-)
> 

Thanks, applied.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-17 13:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-06 20:28 [PATCH v2 0/9] s390: vfio-ccw code rework Eric Farman
2019-06-06 20:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] s390/cio: Squash cp_free() and cp_unpin_free() Eric Farman
2019-06-12 11:07   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-06 20:28 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] s390/cio: Refactor the routine that handles TIC CCWs Eric Farman
2019-06-12 11:17   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-06 20:28 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] s390/cio: Generalize the TIC handler Eric Farman
2019-06-12 11:18   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-06 20:28 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] s390/cio: Use generalized CCW handler in cp_init() Eric Farman
2019-06-12 11:18   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-06 20:28 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] vfio-ccw: Rearrange pfn_array and pfn_array_table arrays Eric Farman
2019-06-13 16:02   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-06 20:28 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] vfio-ccw: Adjust the first IDAW outside of the nested loops Eric Farman
2019-06-13 16:02   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-06 20:28 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] vfio-ccw: Remove pfn_array_table Eric Farman
2019-06-13 16:03   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-06 20:28 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] vfio-ccw: Rearrange IDAL allocation in direct CCW Eric Farman
2019-06-14  9:42   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-06 20:28 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] s390/cio: Combine direct and indirect CCW paths Eric Farman
2019-06-14 10:01   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-14 10:30     ` Eric Farman
2019-06-14 10:03 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] s390: vfio-ccw code rework Cornelia Huck
2019-06-17 13:32 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190617153228.0c5dca9f.cohuck@redhat.com \
    --to=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=alifm@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).