From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_06_12, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07EFBC4321A for ; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 03:53:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C19DB2083B for ; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 03:53:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="KEHhA1GY" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726719AbfF2DxL (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jun 2019 23:53:11 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f193.google.com ([209.85.210.193]:34672 "EHLO mail-pf1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726702AbfF2DxL (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jun 2019 23:53:11 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f193.google.com with SMTP id c85so3930923pfc.1 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 20:53:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id; bh=AWP9ilU5/d/cRlyFilykjm7YgXW5glYDFQzoduKe5xQ=; b=KEHhA1GYWr7MF+kiMKJqm6NlyZ9dTYbYETlJVcgAHbYQ3fvT0BJoe6YkvpOW8vQIvU gSp5Oxk2mGUWrdcnCjc4I07ZN9MN4EtSA0vsih+HDkRdVChjoOIQXXoeBLY2xtrBKzVX r7C7f6pGAqrQKcwsmjckDZpueaqcHo+CrZu/5FEmMk+TSbJOMVcznx9E/3Dcq+FW8xqQ f0FMHvKSZU3xjJ4wx28FsL41y6V/0gRfZVAKzKfo1dZaXRPnY9+c5CL28Mu5EQpbsnxK K0qc5rQXOGxWIBwfBhc5jU9KMdmiEc6s9QKo2uLtH+hijH4stsfsEabovBzq0t0kN9mN Xzbw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id; bh=AWP9ilU5/d/cRlyFilykjm7YgXW5glYDFQzoduKe5xQ=; b=kvhR7WTCna2M3MRpCwYgfJuuc155upX26v+Ck+ImWID5RgwOXk0/5xPYGsALp4CmJC Z2qn9lDkb0WhfPeNg8A98gNS1CSe79mzgX2xmofbEz4FGFztHqCbh7hVawWGMsGxAPcW c/qaLIg/MokG1kcVpS6uTb7WJJ9047ZuNnYhawm4F4G2UeXRjbpWkjRwnb6MpjwPB8db 9nUckSjWwsFkYMzsYyEchJGilgfTA4T61KQt8lHDhL7gbV25j5C10R3aqKHZQTot+1OW Sd9qyJc0PBs4Sqjhf0X12HYwpur8DufPG5VG5p9xK3pL5KvjNCBNTfxEfcFFYD+DX20A Yt0g== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV8DRifpMGNovUEmTmB3XnKVA7xK7O4eSkjaiAn1xzE+bRHD3/a DhVfvKp8Jsidh50mWnG+XDqiImB4s/8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxuUZE4SIaVFBaSyUpjmAhHyh3AJ7cYFhnfuRiDIhUKHabXf5I3vlSR2amjpdnpZghDEv5Z8Q== X-Received: by 2002:a65:63d1:: with SMTP id n17mr1165983pgv.382.1561780390632; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 20:53:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sc2-haas01-esx0118.eng.vmware.com ([66.170.99.1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p27sm5597052pfq.136.2019.06.28.20.53.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 28 Jun 2019 20:53:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Nadav Amit To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Nadav Amit Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/3] x86: Running tests on bare-metal Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 13:30:16 -0700 Message-Id: <20190628203019.3220-1-nadav.amit@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org This is the final bit of enabling KVM-unit-tests to run on bare-metal environment. It requires some pending patches, which I sent before, to be applied first. I have run most of the tests (e.g., vmx, apic, pmu, eventinj) and they seem to be working fine. Not all the tests run the same way they run on KVM, of course, due to the lack of emulated devices. There are some issues with some other tests due to failure of 1GB page allocations. There are several known issues. On my machine I get an error due to errtum (BDX30, BDE31, etc.): FAIL: VMX_VMCS_ENUM.MAX_INDEX expected at least: 2e, actual: 2a And there are also many test errors such as: FAIL: valid link pointer: field 1418: VMREAD and VMWRITE permission: VMX_INST_ERROR (0) is as expected (12) These are test bugs, which Paolo and Liran know about. It is possible to build some automation environment that builds boot entries based on the .cfg file, but I was too busy (or lazy) to do so in a manner that is not distribution-specific. Nadav Amit (3): libcflat: use stdbool x86/vmx: Use plus for positive filters x86: Support environments without test-devices lib/libcflat.h | 5 +--- lib/x86/fwcfg.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ lib/x86/fwcfg.h | 4 +++ x86/apic.c | 4 ++- x86/cstart64.S | 13 +++++++--- x86/eventinj.c | 20 ++++++++++++--- x86/unittests.cfg | 32 ++++++++++++------------ x86/vmx.c | 4 +-- x86/vmx_tests.c | 7 ++++++ 9 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) -- 2.17.1