From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0423EC73C44 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 12:25:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D849F216E3 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 12:25:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726898AbfGIMZo (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jul 2019 08:25:44 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:42776 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726729AbfGIMZm (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jul 2019 08:25:42 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39FAC1576; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 05:25:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from filthy-habits.cambridge.arm.com (unknown [10.1.197.61]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6E3E53F59C; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 05:25:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Marc Zyngier To: Paolo Bonzini , =?UTF-8?q?Radim=20Kr=C4=8Dm=C3=A1=C5=99?= Cc: Andre Przywara , Andrew Murray , Dave Martin , Eric Auger , James Morse , Julien Thierry , Steven Price , Sudeep Holla , Suzuki K Poulose , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH 11/18] KVM: arm/arm64: Re-create event when setting counter value Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 13:25:00 +0100 Message-Id: <20190709122507.214494-12-marc.zyngier@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20190709122507.214494-1-marc.zyngier@arm.com> References: <20190709122507.214494-1-marc.zyngier@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org From: Andrew Murray The perf event sample_period is currently set based upon the current counter value, when PMXEVTYPER is written to and the perf event is created. However the user may choose to write the type before the counter value in which case sample_period will be set incorrectly. Let's instead decouple event creation from PMXEVTYPER and (re)create the event in either suitation. Signed-off-by: Andrew Murray Reviewed-by: Julien Thierry Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier --- virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c index efdc7f6db6cd..f77643f4274c 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ #include #include +static void kvm_pmu_create_perf_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx); /** * kvm_pmu_get_counter_value - get PMU counter value * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer @@ -51,6 +52,9 @@ void kvm_pmu_set_counter_value(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx, u64 val) reg = (select_idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX) ? PMCCNTR_EL0 : PMEVCNTR0_EL0 + select_idx; __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg) += (s64)val - kvm_pmu_get_counter_value(vcpu, select_idx); + + /* Recreate the perf event to reflect the updated sample_period */ + kvm_pmu_create_perf_event(vcpu, select_idx); } /** @@ -367,23 +371,21 @@ static bool kvm_pmu_counter_is_enabled(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx) } /** - * kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type - set selected counter to monitor some event + * kvm_pmu_create_perf_event - create a perf event for a counter * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer - * @data: The data guest writes to PMXEVTYPER_EL0 * @select_idx: The number of selected counter - * - * When OS accesses PMXEVTYPER_EL0, that means it wants to set a PMC to count an - * event with given hardware event number. Here we call perf_event API to - * emulate this action and create a kernel perf event for it. */ -void kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 data, - u64 select_idx) +static void kvm_pmu_create_perf_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx) { struct kvm_pmu *pmu = &vcpu->arch.pmu; struct kvm_pmc *pmc = &pmu->pmc[select_idx]; struct perf_event *event; struct perf_event_attr attr; - u64 eventsel, counter; + u64 eventsel, counter, reg, data; + + reg = (select_idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX) + ? PMCCFILTR_EL0 : PMEVTYPER0_EL0 + select_idx; + data = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg); kvm_pmu_stop_counter(vcpu, pmc); eventsel = data & ARMV8_PMU_EVTYPE_EVENT; @@ -420,6 +422,28 @@ void kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 data, pmc->perf_event = event; } +/** + * kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type - set selected counter to monitor some event + * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer + * @data: The data guest writes to PMXEVTYPER_EL0 + * @select_idx: The number of selected counter + * + * When OS accesses PMXEVTYPER_EL0, that means it wants to set a PMC to count an + * event with given hardware event number. Here we call perf_event API to + * emulate this action and create a kernel perf event for it. + */ +void kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 data, + u64 select_idx) +{ + u64 reg, event_type = data & ARMV8_PMU_EVTYPE_MASK; + + reg = (select_idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX) + ? PMCCFILTR_EL0 : PMEVTYPER0_EL0 + select_idx; + + __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg) = event_type; + kvm_pmu_create_perf_event(vcpu, select_idx); +} + bool kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3(void) { /* -- 2.20.1