From: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> To: eric.auger.pro@gmail.com, eric.auger@redhat.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, joro@8bytes.org, alex.williamson@redhat.com, jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com, yi.l.liu@intel.com, jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, robin.murphy@arm.com Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com, ashok.raj@intel.com, marc.zyngier@arm.com, peter.maydell@linaro.org, vincent.stehle@arm.com, zhangfei.gao@gmail.com Subject: [PATCH v9 11/14] iommu/smmuv3: Nested mode single MSI doorbell per domain enforcement Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 13:49:56 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20190711114959.15675-12-eric.auger@redhat.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20190711114959.15675-1-eric.auger@redhat.com> In nested mode we enforce the rule that all devices belonging to the same iommu_domain share the same msi_domain. Indeed if there were several physical MSI doorbells being used within a single iommu_domain, it becomes really difficult to resolve the nested stage mapping translating into the correct physical doorbell. So let's forbid this situation. Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> --- drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c index 9b4654e2f25c..d0f66807674e 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c @@ -2059,6 +2059,37 @@ static void arm_smmu_detach_dev(struct arm_smmu_master *master) arm_smmu_disable_ats(master); } +static bool arm_smmu_share_msi_domain(struct iommu_domain *domain, + struct device *dev) +{ + struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain); + struct irq_domain *irqd = dev_get_msi_domain(dev); + struct arm_smmu_master *master; + unsigned long flags; + bool share = false; + + if (!irqd) + return true; + + spin_lock_irqsave(&smmu_domain->devices_lock, flags); + list_for_each_entry(master, &smmu_domain->devices, domain_head) { + struct irq_domain *d = dev_get_msi_domain(master->dev); + + if (!d) + continue; + if (irqd != d) { + dev_info(dev, "Nested mode forbids to attach devices " + "using different physical MSI doorbells " + "to the same iommu_domain"); + goto unlock; + } + } + share = true; +unlock: + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&smmu_domain->devices_lock, flags); + return share; +} + static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev) { int ret = 0; @@ -2093,6 +2124,16 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev) ret = -ENXIO; goto out_unlock; } + /* + * In nested mode we must check all devices belonging to the + * domain share the same physical MSI doorbell. Otherwise nested + * stage MSI binding is not supported. + */ + if (smmu_domain->stage == ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_NESTED && + !arm_smmu_share_msi_domain(domain, dev)) { + ret = -EINVAL; + goto out_unlock; + } master->domain = smmu_domain; -- 2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-11 11:51 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-07-11 11:49 [PATCH v9 00/14] SMMUv3 Nested Stage Setup (IOMMU part) Eric Auger 2019-07-11 11:49 ` [PATCH v9 01/14] iommu: Introduce attach/detach_pasid_table API Eric Auger 2019-07-11 11:49 ` [PATCH v9 02/14] iommu: Introduce cache_invalidate API Eric Auger 2019-07-11 11:49 ` [PATCH v9 03/14] iommu: Introduce bind/unbind_guest_msi Eric Auger 2019-07-11 11:49 ` [PATCH v9 04/14] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Maintain a SID->device structure Eric Auger 2019-07-11 11:49 ` [PATCH v9 05/14] iommu/smmuv3: Dynamically allocate s1_cfg and s2_cfg Eric Auger 2019-07-11 11:49 ` [PATCH v9 06/14] iommu/smmuv3: Get prepared for nested stage support Eric Auger 2019-07-11 11:49 ` [PATCH v9 07/14] iommu/smmuv3: Implement attach/detach_pasid_table Eric Auger 2019-07-11 11:49 ` [PATCH v9 08/14] iommu/smmuv3: Introduce __arm_smmu_tlb_inv_asid/s1_range_nosync Eric Auger 2019-07-11 11:49 ` [PATCH v9 09/14] iommu/smmuv3: Implement cache_invalidate Eric Auger 2019-07-11 11:49 ` [PATCH v9 10/14] dma-iommu: Implement NESTED_MSI cookie Eric Auger 2019-07-11 11:49 ` Eric Auger [this message] 2019-07-11 11:49 ` [PATCH v9 12/14] iommu/smmuv3: Enforce incompatibility between nested mode and HW MSI regions Eric Auger 2019-07-11 11:49 ` [PATCH v9 13/14] iommu/smmuv3: Implement bind/unbind_guest_msi Eric Auger 2019-07-11 11:49 ` [PATCH v9 14/14] iommu/smmuv3: Report non recoverable faults Eric Auger
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20190711114959.15675-12-eric.auger@redhat.com \ --to=eric.auger@redhat.com \ --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \ --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \ --cc=eric.auger.pro@gmail.com \ --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \ --cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \ --cc=jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com \ --cc=joro@8bytes.org \ --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \ --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \ --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \ --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \ --cc=vincent.stehle@arm.com \ --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \ --cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \ --cc=zhangfei.gao@gmail.com \ --subject='Re: [PATCH v9 11/14] iommu/smmuv3: Nested mode single MSI doorbell per domain enforcement' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).