kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/14] KVM: retpolines: x86: eliminate retpoline from vmx.c exit handlers
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 12:49:52 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191015164952.GE331@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <933ca564-973d-645e-fe9c-9afb64edba5b@redhat.com>

On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 10:28:39AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> If you're including EXIT_REASON_EPT_MISCONFIG (MMIO access) then you
> should include EXIT_REASON_IO_INSTRUCTION too.  Depending on the devices
> that are in the guest, the doorbell register might be MMIO or PIO.

The fact outb/inb devices exists isn't the question here. The question
you should clarify is: which of the PIO devices is performance
critical as much as MMIO with virtio/vhost? I mean even on real
hardware those devices aren't performance critical. I didn't run into
PIO drivers with properly configured guests.

> So, the difference between my suggested list (which I admit is just
> based on conjecture, not benchmarking) is that you add
> EXIT_REASON_PAUSE_INSTRUCTION, EXIT_REASON_PENDING_INTERRUPT,
> EXIT_REASON_EXTERNAL_INTERRUPT, EXIT_REASON_HLT, EXIT_REASON_MSR_READ,
> EXIT_REASON_CPUID.
> 
> Which of these make a difference for the hrtimer testcase?  It's of
> course totally fine to use benchmarks to prove that my intuition was
> bad---but you must also use them to show why your intuition is right. :)

The hrtimer flood hits on this:

           MSR_WRITE     338793    56.54%     5.51%      0.33us     34.44us      0.44us ( +-   0.20% )
   PENDING_INTERRUPT     168431    28.11%     2.52%      0.36us     32.06us      0.40us ( +-   0.28% )
    PREEMPTION_TIMER      91723    15.31%     1.32%      0.34us     30.51us      0.39us ( +-   0.41% )
  EXTERNAL_INTERRUPT        234     0.04%     0.00%      0.25us      5.53us      0.43us ( +-   5.67% )
                 HLT         65     0.01%    90.64%      0.49us 319933.79us  37562.71us ( +-  21.68% )
            MSR_READ          6     0.00%     0.00%      0.67us      1.96us      1.06us ( +-  17.97% )
       EPT_MISCONFIG          6     0.00%     0.01%      3.09us    105.50us     26.76us ( +-  62.10% )

PENDING_INTERRUPT is the big missing thing in your list. It probably
accounts for the bulk of slowdown from your list.  However I could
imagine other loads with higher external interrupt/hlt/rdmsr than the
hrtimer one so I didn't drop those. Other loads are hitting on a flood
of HLT and from host standpoint it's no a slow path. Not all OS have
the cpuidle haltpoll governor to mitigate the HLT frequency.

I'm pretty sure HLT/EXTERNAL_INTERRUPT/PENDING_INTERRUPT should be
included.

The least useful are PAUSE, CPUID and MSR_READ, we could considering
dropping some of those (in the short term cpuid helps for benchmarking
to more accurately measure the performance improvement of not hitting
the retpoline there). I simply could imagine some load hitting
frequently on those too so I didn't drop them.

I also wonder if VMCALL should be added, certain loads hit on fairly
frequent VMCALL, but none of the one I benchmarked.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-15 16:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-28 17:23 [PATCH 00/14] KVM monolithic v2 Andrea Arcangeli
2019-09-28 17:23 ` [PATCH 01/14] KVM: monolithic: x86: remove kvm.ko Andrea Arcangeli
2019-10-15  1:31   ` Sean Christopherson
2019-10-15  3:18     ` Sean Christopherson
2019-10-15  8:32       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-09-28 17:23 ` [PATCH 02/14] KVM: monolithic: x86: disable linking vmx and svm at the same time into the kernel Andrea Arcangeli
2019-10-15  3:16   ` Sean Christopherson
2019-10-15  8:21     ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-15 15:23       ` Sean Christopherson
2019-09-28 17:23 ` [PATCH 04/14] KVM: monolithic: x86: handle the request_immediate_exit variation Andrea Arcangeli
2019-09-28 17:23 ` [PATCH 05/14] KVM: monolithic: add more section prefixes in the KVM common code Andrea Arcangeli
2019-09-28 17:23 ` [PATCH 06/14] KVM: monolithic: x86: remove __exit section prefix from machine_unsetup Andrea Arcangeli
2019-09-28 17:23 ` [PATCH 07/14] KVM: monolithic: x86: remove __init section prefix from kvm_x86_cpu_has_kvm_support Andrea Arcangeli
2019-09-28 17:23 ` [PATCH 08/14] KVM: monolithic: x86: remove exports Andrea Arcangeli
2019-09-28 17:23 ` [PATCH 09/14] KVM: monolithic: remove exports from KVM common code Andrea Arcangeli
2019-09-28 17:23 ` [PATCH 10/14] KVM: monolithic: x86: drop the kvm_pmu_ops structure Andrea Arcangeli
2019-09-28 17:23 ` [PATCH 11/14] KVM: x86: optimize more exit handlers in vmx.c Andrea Arcangeli
2019-09-28 17:23 ` [PATCH 12/14] KVM: retpolines: x86: eliminate retpoline from vmx.c exit handlers Andrea Arcangeli
2019-10-15  8:28   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-15 16:49     ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2019-10-15 19:46       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-15 20:35         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2019-10-15 22:22           ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-15 23:42             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2019-10-16  7:07               ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-16 16:50                 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2019-10-16 17:01                   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-09-28 17:23 ` [PATCH 13/14] KVM: retpolines: x86: eliminate retpoline from svm.c " Andrea Arcangeli
2019-09-28 17:23 ` [PATCH 14/14] x86: retpolines: eliminate retpoline from msr event handlers Andrea Arcangeli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191015164952.GE331@redhat.com \
    --to=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).