From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] KVM: x86: Add macro to ensure reserved cr4 bits checks stay in sync
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 14:44:16 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191210224416.10757-5-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191210224416.10757-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Add a helper macro to generate the set of reserved cr4 bits for both
host and guest to ensure that adding a check on guest capabilities is
also added for host capabilities, and vice versa.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index ab3a4104febf..d2ab4da75783 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -880,31 +880,34 @@ int kvm_set_xcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 index, u64 xcr)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_set_xcr);
+#define __cr4_reserved_bits(__cpu_has, __c) \
+({ \
+ u64 __reserved_bits = CR4_RESERVED_BITS; \
+ \
+ if (!__cpu_has(__c, X86_FEATURE_XSAVE)) \
+ __reserved_bits |= X86_CR4_OSXSAVE; \
+ if (!__cpu_has(__c, X86_FEATURE_SMEP)) \
+ __reserved_bits |= X86_CR4_SMEP; \
+ if (!__cpu_has(__c, X86_FEATURE_SMAP)) \
+ __reserved_bits |= X86_CR4_SMAP; \
+ if (!__cpu_has(__c, X86_FEATURE_FSGSBASE)) \
+ __reserved_bits |= X86_CR4_FSGSBASE; \
+ if (!__cpu_has(__c, X86_FEATURE_PKU)) \
+ __reserved_bits |= X86_CR4_PKE; \
+ if (!__cpu_has(__c, X86_FEATURE_LA57)) \
+ __reserved_bits |= X86_CR4_LA57; \
+ __reserved_bits; \
+})
+
static u64 kvm_host_cr4_reserved_bits(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
{
- u64 reserved_bits = CR4_RESERVED_BITS;
+ u64 reserved_bits = __cr4_reserved_bits(cpu_has, c);
- if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_XSAVE))
- reserved_bits |= X86_CR4_OSXSAVE;
+ if (cpuid_ecx(0x7) & bit(X86_FEATURE_LA57))
+ reserved_bits &= ~X86_CR4_LA57;
- if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_SMEP))
- reserved_bits |= X86_CR4_SMEP;
-
- if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_SMAP))
- reserved_bits |= X86_CR4_SMAP;
-
- if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_FSGSBASE))
- reserved_bits |= X86_CR4_FSGSBASE;
-
- if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_PKU))
- reserved_bits |= X86_CR4_PKE;
-
- if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_LA57) &&
- !(cpuid_ecx(0x7) & bit(X86_FEATURE_LA57)))
- reserved_bits |= X86_CR4_LA57;
-
- if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_UMIP) && !kvm_x86_ops->umip_emulated())
- reserved_bits |= X86_CR4_UMIP;
+ if (kvm_x86_ops->umip_emulated())
+ reserved_bits &= ~X86_CR4_UMIP;
return reserved_bits;
}
@@ -914,25 +917,7 @@ static int kvm_valid_cr4(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr4)
if (cr4 & cr4_reserved_bits)
return -EINVAL;
- if (!guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_XSAVE) && (cr4 & X86_CR4_OSXSAVE))
- return -EINVAL;
-
- if (!guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_SMEP) && (cr4 & X86_CR4_SMEP))
- return -EINVAL;
-
- if (!guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_SMAP) && (cr4 & X86_CR4_SMAP))
- return -EINVAL;
-
- if (!guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_FSGSBASE) && (cr4 & X86_CR4_FSGSBASE))
- return -EINVAL;
-
- if (!guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_PKU) && (cr4 & X86_CR4_PKE))
- return -EINVAL;
-
- if (!guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_LA57) && (cr4 & X86_CR4_LA57))
- return -EINVAL;
-
- if (!guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_UMIP) && (cr4 & X86_CR4_UMIP))
+ if (cr4 & __cr4_reserved_bits(guest_cpuid_has, vcpu))
return -EINVAL;
return 0;
--
2.24.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-10 22:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-10 22:44 [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86: Add checks on host-reserved cr4 bits Sean Christopherson
2019-12-10 22:44 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: x86: Don't let userspace set " Sean Christopherson
2019-12-10 22:44 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: x86: Ensure all logical CPUs have consistent reserved " Sean Christopherson
2019-12-10 22:44 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: x86: Drop special XSAVE handling from guest_cpuid_has() Sean Christopherson
2019-12-10 22:44 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2020-01-15 18:05 ` [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86: Add checks on host-reserved cr4 bits Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191210224416.10757-5-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).