kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Dr David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
	Christophe de Dinechin <dinechin@redhat.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 15/17] KVM: selftests: Add dirty ring buffer test
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2019 10:22:45 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191224152245.GA17176@xz-x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <521fcdf6-db45-566d-7a83-e8c7a22cf7c5@redhat.com>

On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 02:18:37PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:

[...]

> > +	while (fetch != avail) {
> > +		cur = &dirty_gfns[fetch % TEST_DIRTY_RING_COUNT];
> > +		TEST_ASSERT(cur->pad == 0, "Padding is non-zero: 0x%x", cur->pad);
> > +		TEST_ASSERT(cur->slot == slot, "Slot number didn't match: "
> > +			    "%u != %u", cur->slot, slot);
> > +		TEST_ASSERT(cur->offset < num_pages, "Offset overflow: "
> > +			    "0x%llx >= 0x%llx", cur->offset, num_pages);
> > +		DEBUG("fetch 0x%x offset 0x%llx\n", fetch, cur->offset);
> > +		test_and_set_bit(cur->offset, bitmap);
> > +		fetch++;
> 
> 
> Any reason to use test_and_set_bit()? I guess set_bit() should be
> sufficient.

Yes.

> 
> 
> > +		count++;
> > +	}
> > +	WRITE_ONCE(indices->fetch_index, fetch);
> 
> 
> Is WRITE_ONCE a must here?

No.

[...]

> > +void *vcpu_map_dirty_ring(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid)
> > +{
> > +	struct vcpu *vcpu;
> > +	uint32_t size = vm->dirty_ring_size;
> > +
> > +	TEST_ASSERT(size > 0, "Should enable dirty ring first");
> > +
> > +	vcpu = vcpu_find(vm, vcpuid);
> > +
> > +	TEST_ASSERT(vcpu, "Cannot find vcpu %u", vcpuid);
> > +
> > +	if (!vcpu->dirty_gfns) {
> > +		vcpu->dirty_gfns_count = size / sizeof(struct kvm_dirty_gfn);
> > +		vcpu->dirty_gfns = mmap(NULL, size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
> > +					MAP_SHARED, vcpu->fd, vm->page_size *
> > +					KVM_DIRTY_LOG_PAGE_OFFSET);
> 
> 
> It looks to me that we don't write to dirty_gfn.
> 
> So PROT_READ should be sufficient.

Yes.  Thanks,

-- 
Peter Xu


  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-24 15:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-21  1:49 [PATCH RESEND v2 00/17] KVM: Dirty ring interface Peter Xu
2019-12-21  1:49 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 01/17] KVM: Remove kvm_read_guest_atomic() Peter Xu
2020-01-08 17:45   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-12-21  1:49 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 02/17] KVM: X86: Change parameter for fast_page_fault tracepoint Peter Xu
2020-01-08 17:46   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-12-21  1:49 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 03/17] KVM: X86: Don't track dirty for KVM_SET_[TSS_ADDR|IDENTITY_MAP_ADDR] Peter Xu
2019-12-21 13:51   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-12-23 17:27     ` Peter Xu
2019-12-23 17:59       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-12-23 20:10         ` Peter Xu
2020-01-08 17:46           ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-01-08 19:15             ` Peter Xu
2020-01-08 19:44               ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-01-08 21:02                 ` Peter Xu
2019-12-21  1:49 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 04/17] KVM: Cache as_id in kvm_memory_slot Peter Xu
2020-01-08 17:47   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-12-21  1:49 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 05/17] KVM: Add build-time error check on kvm_run size Peter Xu
2019-12-21  1:49 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 06/17] KVM: Pass in kvm pointer into mark_page_dirty_in_slot() Peter Xu
2020-01-08 17:47   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-12-21  1:49 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 07/17] KVM: Move running VCPU from ARM to common code Peter Xu
2020-01-08 17:47   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-12-21  1:49 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 08/17] KVM: X86: Implement ring-based dirty memory tracking Peter Xu
2019-12-24  6:16   ` Jason Wang
2019-12-24 15:08     ` Peter Xu
2019-12-25  3:23       ` Jason Wang
2020-01-08 15:52   ` Peter Xu
2020-01-08 17:41     ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-01-08 19:06       ` Peter Xu
2020-01-08 19:44         ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-01-08 19:59           ` Peter Xu
2020-01-08 20:06             ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-12-21  1:49 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 09/17] KVM: Make dirty ring exclusive to dirty bitmap log Peter Xu
2019-12-21  1:58 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 10/17] KVM: Don't allocate dirty bitmap if dirty ring is enabled Peter Xu
2019-12-21  2:04 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 11/17] KVM: selftests: Always clear dirty bitmap after iteration Peter Xu
2019-12-21  2:04 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 12/17] KVM: selftests: Sync uapi/linux/kvm.h to tools/ Peter Xu
2019-12-21  2:04 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 13/17] KVM: selftests: Use a single binary for dirty/clear log test Peter Xu
2019-12-21  2:04 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 14/17] KVM: selftests: Introduce after_vcpu_run hook for dirty " Peter Xu
2019-12-21  2:04 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 15/17] KVM: selftests: Add dirty ring buffer test Peter Xu
2019-12-24  6:18   ` Jason Wang
2019-12-24 15:22     ` Peter Xu [this message]
2019-12-24  6:50   ` Jason Wang
2019-12-24 15:24     ` Peter Xu
2019-12-21  2:04 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 16/17] KVM: selftests: Let dirty_log_test async for dirty ring test Peter Xu
2019-12-21  2:04 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 17/17] KVM: selftests: Add "-c" parameter to dirty log test Peter Xu
2019-12-24  6:34 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 00/17] KVM: Dirty ring interface Jason Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191224152245.GA17176@xz-x1 \
    --to=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=dinechin@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).