From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Ulrich Weigand <Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFCv2 05/37] s390/mm: provide memory management functions for protected KVM guests
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 13:15:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200204131537.3ec82487.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e2d208d0-e34c-c3d6-0c1b-57ee9a0c8458@de.ibm.com>
On Tue, 4 Feb 2020 12:56:10 +0100
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 04.02.20 11:57, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>
> >>
> >> /* Generic bits for GMAP notification on DAT table entry changes. */
> >> @@ -61,6 +62,7 @@ struct gmap {
> >> spinlock_t shadow_lock;
> >> struct gmap *parent;
> >> unsigned long orig_asce;
> >> + unsigned long se_handle;
> >
> > This is a deviation from the "protected virtualization" naming scheme
> > used in the previous patches, but I understand that the naming of this
> > whole feature is still in flux :) (Would still be nice to have it
> > consistent, though.)
> >
> > However, I think I'd prefer something named based on protected
> > virtualization: the se_* stuff here just tends to make me think of
> > SELinux...
>
> I will just use guest_handle as this guests assigned to and from such:
>
> arch/s390/include/asm/gmap.h: unsigned long se_handle;
> arch/s390/include/asm/uv.h: .guest_handle = gmap->se_handle,
> arch/s390/kvm/pv.c: WRITE_ONCE(kvm->arch.gmap->se_handle, 0);
> arch/s390/kvm/pv.c: kvm->arch.gmap->se_handle = uvcb.guest_handle;
> arch/s390/mm/fault.c: .guest_handle = gmap->se_handle,
Even better.
>
>
> >
> >> int edat_level;
> >> bool removed;
> >> bool initialized;
> >> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/mmu.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/mmu.h
> >> index bcfb6371086f..984026cb3608 100644
> >> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/mmu.h
> >> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/mmu.h
> >> @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ typedef struct {
> >> unsigned long asce;
> >> unsigned long asce_limit;
> >> unsigned long vdso_base;
> >> + /* The mmu context belongs to a secure guest. */
> >> + atomic_t is_se;
> >
> > Here as well.
>
> I will use is "is_protected"
ok
> >
> >> /*
> >> * The following bitfields need a down_write on the mm
> >> * semaphore when they are written to. As they are only
> >
> > (...)
> >
> >> @@ -520,6 +521,15 @@ static inline int mm_has_pgste(struct mm_struct *mm)
> >> return 0;
> >> }
> >>
> >> +static inline int mm_is_se(struct mm_struct *mm)
> >> +{
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_S390_PROTECTED_VIRTUALIZATION_HOST
> >> + if (unlikely(atomic_read(&mm->context.is_se)))
> >> + return 1;
> >> +#endif
> >> + return 0;
> >> +}
> >
> > I'm wondering how big of an overhead we actually have because we need
> > to check the flag here if the feature is enabled. We have an extra
> > check in a few functions anyway, even if protected virt is not
> > configured in. Given that distributions would likely want to enable the
> > feature in their kernels, I'm currently tending towards dropping the
> > extra config option.
>
> Makes sense. I will wait a bit more but if you do not disagree I will remove
> the extra host config and bind things to CONFIG_KVM or CONFIG_PGSTE depending
> on context
From the code I read so far, that makes sense.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-04 12:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 200+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-03 13:19 [RFCv2 00/37] KVM: s390: Add support for protected VMs Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-03 13:19 ` [RFCv2 01/37] DOCUMENTATION: protvirt: Protected virtual machine introduction Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-03 15:42 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-03 21:41 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-04 9:19 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-04 9:32 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-03 13:19 ` [RFCv2 02/37] s390/protvirt: introduce host side setup Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-03 17:12 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-03 22:03 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-04 9:28 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-04 9:38 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-04 9:49 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-04 8:40 ` Thomas Huth
2020-02-04 9:12 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-03 13:19 ` [RFCv2 03/37] s390/protvirt: add ultravisor initialization Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-04 10:03 ` Thomas Huth
2020-02-04 10:23 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-04 11:22 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-03 13:19 ` [RFCv2 04/37] mm:gup/writeback: add callbacks for inaccessible pages Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-03 13:19 ` [RFCv2 05/37] s390/mm: provide memory management functions for protected KVM guests Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-04 10:57 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-04 11:48 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2020-02-04 11:56 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-04 12:15 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2020-02-05 9:52 ` Janosch Frank
2020-02-03 13:19 ` [RFCv2 06/37] s390: add (non)secure page access exceptions handlers Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-04 10:37 ` Thomas Huth
2020-02-04 11:41 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2020-02-04 12:48 ` Thomas Huth
2020-02-04 13:08 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2020-02-04 13:22 ` Thomas Huth
2020-02-04 12:03 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-04 11:18 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-04 12:04 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-03 13:19 ` [RFCv2 07/37] KVM: s390: add new variants of UV CALL Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-04 12:11 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-04 12:30 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2020-02-04 12:34 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-04 13:33 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-04 13:27 ` Thomas Huth
2020-02-04 13:55 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-03 13:19 ` [RFCv2 08/37] KVM: s390: protvirt: Add initial lifecycle handling Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-04 12:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-04 12:34 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-05 10:01 ` Janosch Frank
2020-02-04 16:27 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-04 21:13 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-03 13:19 ` [RFCv2 09/37] KVM: s390: protvirt: Add KVM api documentation Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-04 20:19 ` Thomas Huth
2020-02-04 21:40 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-03 13:19 ` [RFCv2 10/37] KVM: s390: protvirt: Secure memory is not mergeable Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-04 12:15 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-04 12:53 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-04 12:54 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-04 13:04 ` [PATCH v2 " Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-04 13:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-03 13:19 ` [RFCv2 11/37] KVM: s390/mm: Make pages accessible before destroying the guest Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-04 20:52 ` Thomas Huth
2020-02-05 9:03 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-05 10:35 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-05 18:29 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-03 13:19 ` [RFCv2 12/37] KVM: s390: protvirt: Handle SE notification interceptions Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-04 12:16 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-04 12:23 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-04 21:16 ` Thomas Huth
2020-02-04 21:46 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-03 13:19 ` [RFCv2 13/37] KVM: s390: protvirt: Instruction emulation Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-04 12:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-04 12:29 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-04 17:07 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-04 21:21 ` Thomas Huth
2020-02-03 13:19 ` [RFCv2 14/37] KVM: s390: protvirt: Add interruption injection controls Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-05 6:59 ` Thomas Huth
2020-02-05 8:46 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-05 8:56 ` Michael Mueller
2020-02-05 8:54 ` Michael Mueller
2020-02-05 10:45 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-03 13:19 ` [RFCv2 15/37] KVM: s390: protvirt: Implement interruption injection Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-05 9:51 ` Thomas Huth
2020-02-05 10:48 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-05 11:25 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-05 17:49 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-06 8:21 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-05 17:56 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-05 11:31 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-05 11:46 ` Michael Mueller
2020-02-05 12:11 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-05 12:26 ` Michael Mueller
2020-02-05 18:00 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-06 8:23 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-05 15:30 ` Michael Mueller
2020-02-03 13:19 ` [RFCv2 16/37] KVM: s390: protvirt: Add SCLP interrupt handling Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-05 12:22 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-05 18:14 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-03 13:19 ` [RFCv2 17/37] KVM: s390: protvirt: Add machine-check interruption injection controls Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-05 7:06 ` Thomas Huth
2020-02-03 13:19 ` [RFCv2 18/37] KVM: s390: protvirt: Implement machine-check interruption injection Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-05 7:10 ` Thomas Huth
2020-02-05 13:47 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-05 18:18 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-06 8:25 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-06 9:01 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-06 9:11 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-03 13:19 ` [RFCv2 19/37] KVM: s390: protvirt: Handle spec exception loops Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-05 13:50 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-05 18:21 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-03 13:19 ` [RFCv2 20/37] KVM: s390: protvirt: Add new gprs location handling Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-05 11:18 ` Thomas Huth
2020-02-05 18:45 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-05 13:52 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-03 13:19 ` [RFCv2 21/37] KVM: S390: protvirt: Introduce instruction data area bounce buffer Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-05 11:43 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-06 8:43 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-05 12:02 ` Thomas Huth
2020-02-05 12:16 ` Janosch Frank
2020-02-05 17:00 ` Thomas Huth
2020-02-06 9:07 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-06 9:18 ` Thomas Huth
2020-02-06 9:21 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-06 9:20 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-06 9:32 ` Janosch Frank
2020-02-06 9:29 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-06 9:39 ` [RFCv2.1] " Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-06 9:54 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-06 10:02 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-06 10:08 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-06 10:10 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-06 12:46 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-06 10:32 ` Thomas Huth
2020-02-06 11:07 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-03 13:19 ` [RFCv2 22/37] KVM: s390: protvirt: handle secure guest prefix pages Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-05 11:51 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-05 19:38 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-05 11:52 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-05 19:39 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-03 13:19 ` [RFCv2 23/37] KVM: s390/mm: handle guest unpin events Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-03 13:19 ` [RFCv2 24/37] KVM: s390: protvirt: Write sthyi data to instruction data area Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-05 12:09 ` Thomas Huth
2020-02-05 18:52 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-05 14:27 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-03 13:19 ` [RFCv2 25/37] KVM: s390: protvirt: STSI handling Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-05 12:13 ` Thomas Huth
2020-02-05 19:22 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-03 13:19 ` [RFCv2 26/37] KVM: s390: protvirt: disallow one_reg Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-05 12:16 ` Thomas Huth
2020-02-05 19:25 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-05 14:42 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-03 13:19 ` [RFCv2 27/37] KVM: s390: protvirt: Only sync fmt4 registers Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-04 17:15 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-04 22:08 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-05 16:29 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-03 13:19 ` [RFCv2 28/37] KVM: s390: protvirt: Add program exception injection Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-05 16:38 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-05 19:31 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-05 17:59 ` Thomas Huth
2020-02-05 19:32 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-03 13:19 ` [RFCv2 29/37] DOCUMENTATION: protvirt: Diag 308 IPL Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-03 16:13 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-04 8:13 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-04 9:35 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-03 13:19 ` [RFCv2 30/37] KVM: s390: protvirt: Add diag 308 subcode 8 - 10 handling Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-04 18:51 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-04 22:19 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-05 18:21 ` Thomas Huth
2020-02-06 10:59 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-03 13:19 ` [RFCv2 31/37] KVM: s390: protvirt: UV calls diag308 0, 1 Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-03 13:19 ` [RFCv2 32/37] KVM: s390: protvirt: Report CPU state to Ultravisor Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-06 11:12 ` Thomas Huth
2020-02-06 11:17 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-06 14:29 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-03 13:19 ` [RFCv2 33/37] KVM: s390: protvirt: Support cmd 5 operation state Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-06 11:21 ` Thomas Huth
2020-02-06 15:17 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-03 13:19 ` [RFCv2 34/37] KVM: s390: protvirt: Add UV debug trace Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-06 9:41 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-07 8:05 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-07 8:27 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-14 8:32 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-14 8:53 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-03 13:19 ` [RFCv2 35/37] KVM: s390: protvirt: Mask PSW interrupt bits for interception 104 and 112 Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-06 10:10 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-06 11:11 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-06 12:03 ` Thomas Huth
2020-02-03 13:19 ` [RFCv2 36/37] KVM: s390: protvirt: do not inject interrupts after start Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-06 10:13 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-06 14:24 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-06 12:03 ` Thomas Huth
2020-02-03 13:19 ` [RFCv2 37/37] KVM: s390: protvirt: Add UV cpu reset calls Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-05 18:27 ` Thomas Huth
2020-02-05 20:24 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-06 10:45 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-06 14:27 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-06 14:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-06 15:07 ` Thomas Huth
2020-02-03 13:23 ` [RFCv2 00/37] KVM: s390: Add support for protected VMs Cornelia Huck
2020-02-03 13:32 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-03 14:42 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-05 11:34 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-05 11:38 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-05 11:40 ` Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200204131537.3ec82487.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).